Morphology of the central retina and scotopic visual sensitivity were compared in juvenile albino and normally pigmented rainbow trout living under natural and reduced daylight. Outdoor albinos avoided exposing their eyes to direct sunlight, whereas normals were indifferent to it. After 4 months outdoors (-10,000 lux in albinos, -100,000 lux in normals), albinos had severely truncated or missing rod outer segments (ROS) and some missing rod ellipsoids, but normal numbers of photoreceptor nuclei and fully intact cones. Albino estimated ROS volume was only 7.1% of normal in July, but increased to 20% by the following February, mainly via an increase in numbers of ROS. However, in albinos moved indoors October 7 and exposed to 10-30 lux ambient daylight, both the number and length of ROS increased significantly, with estimated ROS volume reaching 95% of normal by 34 days. Albinos generally had more phagosomes (-3 X normal) and more macrophages (-2 X normal) in their outer retina. An optomotor reflex was used to define the effect of ROS volume on the ability to respond visually during dark adaptation. In July, albinos and normals from outdoor raceways (3 months) or indoor raceways (35 days) showed equal sensitivity after first being placed in darkness, but after 1 h in darkness, outdoor albinos with 6% of normal ROS volume were 2.0 log units less sensitive than indoor or outdoor normals, whereas indoor albinos with 53% of normal ROS volume were only 0.7 log units less sensitive. This verifies that most rod cell bodies of albino trout can persist without functional ROS in indirect sunlight, and can regrow functional outer segments in dim daylight. This finding is distinct from the extensive retinal light damage observed in albino rats exposed to more moderate cyclic light, in which entire rod cells degenerate early on.

No abstract

Albino vertebrates exposed to intense light typically lose photoreceptors via apoptosis, and thus serve as useful models of retinal degeneration. In contrast, albino rainbow trout exposed to intense light maintain populations of rod and cone nuclei despite substantial damage to rod outer segments (ROS). The aim of this study was to differentiate between two hypotheses that could account for this divergent result: (1) trout rod nuclei remain intact during light damage, or (2) rod nuclei die but are replaced by cell proliferation. A further aim was to examine whether photic history modulates retinal damage, as in rodents. Albino and normally pigmented trout were moved from defined photic regimes into full daylight, while some were not moved to serve as protected controls. ROS were always maintained in pigmented fish and in albinos protected from full daylight. In albinos exposed to full daylight, ROS were removed over most of the central retina, whereas rod nuclei were maintained in the outer nuclear layer over 10 days. Pyknotic and TUNEL-labeled rod nuclei were abundant in affected albinos at all time-points tested. Rod death occurred without a decrease in the number of rod nuclei, confirming that proliferation must be replacing cells. Indeed a transient increase in proliferation was observed in retinal progenitors of albinos receiving 5 days of damaging light. This proliferative response was decreased with further damage. Cones remained intact even in areas where rod nuclei had degenerated. Pretreatment with light of moderate versus low intensity light affected the cell death and proliferative responses, and the ectopic localization of rod opsin. We conclude that apoptotic demise of rods, but not cones, occurred during light damage in retinas of albino trout and proliferative responses have a limited a capacity to replace lost rods.

No abstract