No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This prospective study evaluated a calcineurin inhibitor-free graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen of ruxolitinib in combination with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). <b><i>Patents and Methods:</i></b> Twenty patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis were prospectively enrolled. Reduced intensity conditioning was performed, followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation from related (<i>n</i> = 7) or unrelated (<i>n</i> = 13) donors. GVHD prophylaxis included only PTCy and ruxolitinib (45 mg) from day–7 to day–2, and 15 mg from day+5 to day+100. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02806375. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Primary engraftment was documented in 17 patients. One patient experienced primary graft failure and 2 died before engraftment. Eleven patients demonstrated severe poor graft function (SPGF), which required ruxolitinib dose reduction. The regimen was well tolerated, with grade 3–4 non-haematological toxicity in 30%, viral reactivation in 45%, and severe sepsis in 15% of patients. The incidence of acute GVHD grade II–IV was 25%, grade III-IV GVHD was 15%, and moderate chronic GVHD was 20%, with no severe cases. Only 2 patients required systemic steroids. Haematological relapse was documented in 1 patient. Two-year non-relapse mortality was 15%, 2-year overall survival was 85%, and 2-year event-free survival was 72%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and ruxolitinib is associated with low toxicity, good acute and chronic GVHD control, and low relapse incidence. However, the relatively high rate of SPGF should be taken into account. SPGF could possibly be mitigated by ruxolitinib dose reduction.

No abstract

Background: Anticomplement C5 therapy with eculizumab is the standard of treatment of patients (pts) with active hemolytic PNH. However, there are few data on long-term complement inhibition efficacy and current PNH prognosis from real-world clinical practice. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term eculizumab efficacy and PNH outcomes in the large cohort in Russia. Methods: As of August 1, 2018, a total of 354 pts with hemolytic PNH were observed in the I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University in cooperation with the local hematological service in 75 regions of Russia (n=344), as well as in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Tajikistan (n=10) (Table 1). The analysis was conducted in the whole cohort and separately in the prospective phase after November 2011 with the eculizumab availability in Russia. We analyzed indications and access to anticomplement C5 therapy according to National guidelines (2014), frequency and causes of discontinuation of therapy, cumulative incidence of independence from transfusions with allo-HSCT as competing risk, frequency of breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) and intensive extravascular hemolysis, overall survival (OS) and causes of mortality. Results: According to the current National guidelines (2014), 323 pts had at least one indication for therapy with eculizumab: thrombosis (n=89, 25 %), transfusion-dependent hemolytic anemia (n=261, 74 %), acute kidney injury (AKI, n=69, 19 %), chronic kidney disease (CKD, n=244/304, 80 %) including CKD stage ≥ 2 (n=66/304, 22 %), pulmonary hypertension (n=66/265, 25 %) and pregnancy (n=22). Due to differences in regional support for rare diseases, only 204 (63%) pts had access to therapy with eculizumab. In addition, 19 pts received novel anti-C5 agent in clinical trial and were excluded from analysis. Allogeneic HSCT was performed in 24 pts, including 2 cases of MDS/AML evolved from AA/PNH and 17 cases of severe AA/PNH with eculizumab bridging in the prospective phase. With the median duration of eculizumab therapy of 3.4 years (0.2-6.1) the independence from RBC transfusions (TI) was achieved in 109 of 154 initially transfused pts (71 %) with a cumulative incidence of 61 % (95 % CI, 52-68) and 69 % (95 % CI, 60-76) after 12 and 24 months of therapy respectively. The median hemoglobin level at last follow-up were 6.6 (4.0-9.7), 10.5 (range, 7.1-15.4) and 12.1 g/dl (8.9-14.0) in patients who did not reach the TI, who reached the TI and were never transfused, respectively (p =0.0001). BTH was documented in 36 of 184 evaluated pts (20 %), including 16 and 20 cases with and without obvious triggers respectively. Intensive extravascular hemolysis with bilirubin level > 2xULN persisted in 31 % pts. Temporary or permanent discontinuation of eculizumab treatment occurred in 58 pts due to death (n=11), allogeneic BMT (n=17), spontaneous clone reduction (n = 4), absence of new indications 6 months after delivery (n=4), and terminating access to treatment (n=22). All pts of the latter group developed a relapse of intensive intravascular hemolysis, which in 3 cases was complicated by AKI (n=1), stroke (n=1) and myocardial infarction (n=1). OS was assessed in the prospective phase after 2011. A total of 24/203 (12 %) pts died which resulted in 5-year OS of 87% (CI 95 %, 81-92). Treatment with eculizumab significantly improved OS (Fig.1). The 5-year OS rate was 91% (CI 95 %, 85-98) in pts treated with eculizumab and 74 % (CI 95 %, 63-85) in never-treated pts (p=0.0003). There were significant differences in the causes of death between pts receiving and not receiving eculizumab: related to thrombosis 1/7 (14 %) vs 9/17 (53 %), AA and MDS 4/7 (57%) vs 5/17 (29 %). Conclusions: The results of the study show both the high efficacy and limitations of treatment with eculizumab for PNH in real-world practice. Prospectively confirmed significant improvement of the overall survival on eculizumab stress the need for faster and wider access to costly therapy. Nevertherless, a number of limitations, including BTH and extravascular hemolysis, lack of control of bone marrow failure and further clonal evolution, determine the relevance of next-generation complement inhibitors and risk-adjusted allogeneic HSCT as a curative option. Disclosures Kulagin: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria.

п е р с п е к т и в н ы е и с с л е д о в а н и я

No abstract

Allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) is potentially curative option for a wide variety of malignant and nonmalignant disorders of hematopoiesis. For patients who lack an HLA-matched sibling, HLA-haploidentical related donors (haplo-HSCT) can be considered as alternative sources of donor graft s. Th e benefi ts of haplo-HSCT include immediate donor availability for patients who are in urgent need of the transplant. Besides, an availability of a related donor makes post-transplant donor-derived cellular therapy more easily accessible. In addition, the greater HLA mismatch associated with haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) may potentiate graft-versus-tumor (GVT) eff ects. Th e aim of our study was to summarize our single-center experience of haplo-HSCT performed with non-manipulated graft s in adult patients with different malignant diseases. Th e study included a total of 119 patients with diff erent hematological disorders subjected to haplo-HSCT. At the time of analysis, median follow-up was 371 days (1-2219). Most frequent diagnosis in transplanted patients was acute leukemia. 67 (56%) patients received haplo-HSCT as salvage therapy. Overall survival with an observation term of 2 years was 40.3% for the general group. In particular, the two-year OS in patients transplanted in remissions of ALL and AML was 57% and 46% respectively as compared to 22% and 15% for the patients transplanted in adverse disease status). Two-year event-free survival (EFS) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) group proved to be 35.7% and 21% respectively. Th e cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and severe aGVHD grade III-IV was 19% and 10% respectively. Th e cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 16%. Th e cumulative incidence of relapse was 21%. Th e overall transplant-associated mortality was 43% in the studied group. In conclusion, our results show that unmanipulated haplo-HSCT is reasonable treatment option for adult patients with diff erent malignant disorders of hematopoiesis. However, such problems as higher rate graft failure, increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and post-transplant relapses remain extremely relevant.

Aim. To comparatively analyze myelofibrosis treatment outcomes with the use of ruxolitinib versus ruxolitinib with subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as well as to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib in pre- and post-transplantation periods. Materials & Methods. The study enrolled 78 myelofibrosis patients who were referred to the RM Gorbacheva Scientific Research Institute to determine the indications for allo-HSCT. Allo-HSCT was performed in 33 patients, among them 32 patients with ruxolitinib pre-conditioning (ruxolitinib + allo-HSCT group). They received reduced intensity conditioning (fludarabine 180 mg/m² and busulfan 10 mg/kg). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg on Day +3 and Day +4, ruxolitinib 10 mg per day from Day +5 to Day +100 (n = 31), rabbit antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 2). Ruxolitinib without allo-HSCT was administered to 45 patients (ruxolitinib group). Between the groups there were no significant differences with respect to gender, age, diagnosis, and molecular genetic variant. Results. Median therapy duration in ruxolitinib group was 16 months (range 2-78 months). In 2 (4 %) patients partial response was achieved, 8 (20 %) patients showed clinical improvement, in 16 (39 %) patients stable disease (SD) was reported, in 15 (37 %) patients disease progression (DP) was detected. The treatment succeeded in reducing the spleen size in 8 (20 %) patients and in relieving disease symptoms in 16 (39 %) patients. Cumulative incidence of progression within 3 years was 44 % (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 27-60 %). In ruxolitinib + allo-HSCT group median ruxolitinib therapy duration was 7 months (range 3-22 months). As a result, clinical improvement in 9 (28 %) cases, SD in 17 cases (53 %), and DP in 6 (19 %) cases were observed. In 5 (20 %) patients acute GVHD of grade 2-4, in 3 (12 %) patients acute GVHD of grade 3-4, and in 6 (24 %) patients chronic medium severity GVHD were identified. Within 1 year nonrelapse mortality was 28 % (95% CI 14-44 %). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 12 % (95% CI 3-28 %) in ruxolitinib + allo-HSCT group. According to the landmark analysis performed throughout 6 months from the first visit to the center, the 3-year overall survival in the group with allo-HSCT was 80 %, whereas in ruxolitinib group it was 41 % (p = 0.022), 12-month landmark analysis resulted in 77 % and 43 % (p = 0.028), and 18-month landmark analysis showed 86 % and 46 % (p = 0.015) in two groups, respectively. Conclusion. Despite the efficacy of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, the risk of myelofibrosis progression is not to be underestimated. Therefore, in DIPSS intermediate-2 and high-risk patients the issue about performing allo-HSCT should be promptly clarified.