Assembled actin filaments support cellular signaling, intracellular trafficking, and cytokinesis. ATP hydrolysis triggered by actin assembly provides the structural cues for filament turnover in vivo. Here, we present the cryo-electron microscopic (cryo-EM) structure of filamentous actin (F-actin) in the presence of phosphate, with the visualization of some α-helical backbones and large side chains. A complete atomic model based on the EM map identified intermolecular interactions mediated by bound magnesium and phosphate ions. Comparison of the F-actin model with G-actin monomer crystal structures reveals a critical role for bending of the conserved proline-rich loop in triggering phosphate release following ATP hydrolysis. Crystal structures of G-actin show that mutations in this loop trap the catalytic site in two intermediate states of the ATPase cycle. The combined structural information allows us to propose a detailed molecular mechanism for the biochemical events, including actin polymerization and ATPase activation, critical for actin filament dynamics.

We have developed a novel system for expressing recombinant actin in Dictyostelium. In this system, the C terminus of actin is fused to thymosin ␤ via a glycine-based linker. The fusion protein is purified using a His tag attached to the thymosin ␤ moiety and then cleaved by chymotrypsin immediately after the native final residue of actin to yield intact actin. Wildtype actin prepared in this way was functionally normal in terms of its polymerization kinetics and muscle myosin-mediated motility. We expected that this system would be particularly useful for expressing toxic actin mutants, because the actin moiety of the fusion protein is unlikely to interact with the actin cytoskeleton of the host cells. We therefore chose to express the E206A/R207A/E208A mutant, which appears to be dominant lethal in yeast, as a model case of a toxic actin mutant that is difficult to express. We found that the E206A/R207A/E208A mutant could be expressed and purified with a yield comparable to the wild-type molecule (3-4 mg/20 g cells), even though green fluorescent protein-fused actin carrying the E206A/ R207A/E208A mutation was expressed at a much lower level than wild-type actin. Purified E206A/R207A/E208A actin did not polymerize, even in the presence of muscle actin; however, it accelerated polymerization of muscle actin and inhibited the nucleating and severing activities of gelsolin. Given that the location of the substituted residues is near the pointed end face of the mutant, we suggest that E206A/R207A/E208A actin behaves like a weak pointed end-capping protein that perturbs the actin cytoskeleton of the host cells.Actin filaments in live cells undergo continuous, dynamic turnover and remodeling. These processes involve polymerization, depolymerization, severing, capping, and branching of actin filaments through interaction with a vast array of actinbinding proteins. At present, understanding how the activities of these proteins are regulated is a major issue in cell biology. In addition, it is known that subunits within actin filaments are able to take different conformations and that, in certain cases, large blocks of subunits spanning long distances within individual filaments undergo cooperative conformational changes (1-6). For instance, in the case of thin filaments in striated muscle, Ca 2ϩ -triggered conformational changes in the filaments are enhanced by cooperative conformational changes induced by myosin (reviewed in Ref. 7). In other cases, however, the physiological function of cooperative conformational changes in actin subunits remains unclear. Thus, a number of interesting questions as to the structure and function of actin filaments remain unanswered. Dominant negative actin mutations have been identified from genetic screens, and these mutants may be useful for the elucidation of actin functions, because the use of dominant negative mutant proteins often provides a unique means of dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying complex phenomena, particularly those that involve direct interaction among ...

Heavy meromyosin (HMM) of myosin II and cofilin each binds to actin filaments cooperatively and forms clusters along the filaments, but it is unknown whether the two cooperative bindings are correlated and what physiological roles they have. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that HMM-GFP and cofilin-mCherry each bound cooperatively to different parts of actin filaments when they were added simultaneously in 0.2 μM ATP, indicating that the two cooperative bindings are mutually exclusive. In 0.1 mM ATP, the motor domain of myosin (S1) strongly inhibited the formation of cofilin clusters along actin filaments. Under this condition, most actin protomers were unoccupied by S1 at any given moment, suggesting that transiently bound S1 alters the structure of actin filaments cooperatively and/or persistently to inhibit cofilin binding. Consistently, cosedimentation experiments using copolymers of actin and actin-S1 fusion protein demonstrated that the fusion protein affects the neighboring actin protomers, reducing their affinity for cofilin. In reciprocal experiments, cofilin-actin fusion protein reduced the affinity of neighboring actin protomers for S1. Thus, allosteric regulation by cooperative conformational changes of actin filaments contributes to mutually exclusive cooperative binding of myosin II and cofilin to actin filaments, and presumably to the differential localization of both proteins in cells.

Recently, we revealed that microtubule-associated protein (MAP) 4 isoforms, which differ in the number of repeat sequences, alter the microtubule surface properties, and we proposed a hypothesis stating that the change in the surface properties may regulate the movements of microtubule motors [Tokuraku et al. (2003) J Biol Chem 278: 29609-29618]. In this study, we examined whether MAP4 isoforms affect the kinesin motor activity. When the MAP4 isoforms were present in an in vitro gliding assay, the five-repeat isoform but not the three- and four-repeat isoforms inhibited the movement of the microtubules in a concentration-dependent manner. The observation of individual microtubules revealed that in the presence of the five-repeat isoform, the microtubules completely stopped their movements or recurrently paused and resumed their movements, with no deceleration in the moving phase. The result can be explained by assuming that kinesin stops its movement when it encounters a microtubular region whose properties are altered by the MAPs. A sedimentation assay demonstrated that the MAP4 isoforms did not compete with kinesin for binding to microtubules, indicating that kinesin can bind to the MAP-bound microtubules, although it cannot move on them.