The present study examines the potential impact of a mnemonic acronym on the learning, the execution, the resilience toward interruptions, and the mental representation of an eight-step procedural task with sequential constraints. 65 participants were required to learn a sequential task, including eight different steps which had to be carried out in a predefined sequence. 33 participants were provided with the acronym “WORTKLAU” as a mnemonic to support the learning and execution of the task and the other 32 participants had to learn and execute the task without such support. Each letter of the acronym coded one step of the task, involving a binary decision about a certain property of the complex stimulus. In 60 out of 72 trials of the task, participants were interrupted between different steps, and had to perform a 2-back interruption task for 6 or 30 s, after which they had to resume the procedural task as quickly as possible at the correct step. Learning times, performance in uninterrupted trials, and post-interruption performance measures were analyzed. Results of Experiment 1 suggest that the mnemonic acronym enhanced learning of the task sequence, and provide some evidence for a hierarchical mental representation of the task, resulting in faster resumption times at certain steps of the procedure after an interruption. In Experiment 2 the internal structure of the acronym was even emphasized by a hyphen at the borders of the two words included in the acronym (WORT-KLAU). This improved the resilience toward interruptions at the border step of the procedure significantly. Our results provide evidence for beneficial effects of mnemonic acronym particularly for the learning of a sequential procedural task. In addition, they suggest that the structure of mnemonic acronym directly impacts the mental representation of a task. Finally, they show that mnemonic acronyms could be used to improve the resilience toward detrimental effect of interruptions, at least at certain task steps of a procedural task.

Objective Mood and physical symptoms related to the menstrual cycle affect women's productivity at work, often leading to absenteeism. However, employer-led initiatives to tackle these issues are lacking. Digital health interventions focused on women's health (such as the Flo app) could help fill this gap. Methods 1867 users of the Flo app participated in a survey exploring the impact of their menstrual cycle on their workplace productivity and the role of Flo in mitigating some of the identified issues. Results The majority reported a moderate to severe impact of their cycle on workplace productivity, with 45.2% reporting absenteeism (5.8 days on average in the previous 12 months). 48.4% reported not receiving any support from their manager and 94.6% said they were not provided with any specific benefit for issues related to their menstrual cycle, with 75.6% declaring wanting them. Users stated that the Flo app helped them with the management of menstrual cycle symptoms (68.7%), preparedness and bodily awareness (88.7%), openness with others (52.5%), and feeling supported (77.6%). Users who reported the most positive impact of the Flo app were 18–25% less likely to report an impact of their menstrual cycle on their productivity and 12–18% less likely to take days off work for issues related to their cycle. Conclusions Apps such as Flo could equip individuals with tools to better cope with issues related to their menstrual cycle and facilitate discussions around menstrual health in the workplace.

We investigated the impact of frequency of interruptions in a simulated medical visual search task. Participants (N = 150) performed the visual search task during which they were interrupted by a number-classification task in 25, 50, or 75% of all trials, respectively, reflecting the frequency conditions (i.e., low, mid, high). Target presence (i.e., present vs. absent) and interruption (i.e., uninterrupted vs. interrupted) were varied within-subjects, and interruption frequency was varied between-subjects. Globally, on a frequency condition level, participants in the low frequency condition had longer mean response times (RT) for the primary visual search task than in the high condition, but there were no other performance differences between the three frequency conditions. Locally, on the level of specific interruption effects, accuracy decreased directly after interruptions for target present but not for target absent trials. Furthermore, interruptions caused significant interruption costs, reflected in slower overall RTs in interrupted than in uninterrupted trials. The combined findings show that especially for critical visual search tasks as in the medical field, interruptions—regardless of frequency—should be avoided.

Introduction: Low health literacy among girls, women, and people who menstruate is associated with worse reproductive health outcomes. Mobile apps promise tools for improving women’s health literacy, however, there is little information about subscribers’ perceptions of app functionality and its impact on their knowledge and health. Objective: This study aimed to explore knowledge and health improvements related to menstrual cycle and pregnancy, as well as improvements in general health in Flo app users. We also investigated what components of the Flo app were associated with the above mentioned improvements, and evaluated whether those improvements differed based on education level, free or a premium subscription to the app, short or long term use of the app, and frequency of use. Methods: Flo subscribers who had been using the app for no less than 30 days completed an online survey. A total of 2214 of complete survey responses were collected. The survey included demographic questions, questions about motivations guiding usage of the Flo app, to what extent and what components of the app may have helped improve their knowledge and health (i.e., reproductive, sexual, physical, mental health, health behaviours, and communication with healthcare providers).Results: Most study participants reported menstrual cycle (89.0%) and pregnancy (84.6%) knowledge improvements from Flo app use. 62.3% of Flo users reported ‘period predictions’ and 72.2% reported ‘reading and/or watching articles and video sources in the app’ helped them feel the most informed about their cycle and pregnancy health. Higher educated, Flo Premium, frequent, and short term app users reported using the app mainly for getting pregnant and pregnancy tracking. Lower educated and long time users reported using the app to learn more about their body, sexual health, irregular cycles and related conditions, and to avoid pregnancy. Importantly, intended uses of the app for both lower and higher educated users matched areas in which they have gained knowledge and achieved their health goals upon the Flo app use. Flo Premium, frequent, and long term users were more likely to report improvements in knowledge and health in all areas they chose to use the app for and even beyond.Conclusion: There is a need to increase reproductive health literacy in the global female population. This study has shown that the use of the period tracking app, Flo, as self-reported by its users, improved their menstrual cycle and pregnancy knowledge and health. Additionally, more frequent, long-term, and Flo Premium users were more likely to report knowledge and health improvements across multiple health areas. Thus, the use of digital health apps, such as the Flo app, should be considered for integration into healthcare systems to increase women’s health literacy in the wider population.