Purpose Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by excessive hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, elevating interstitial pressure and impairing perfusion. Preclinical studies demonstrated pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) degrades HA, thereby increasing drug delivery. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PAG) or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG). Tumor HA levels were measured retrospectively using a novel affinity histochemistry assay. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; overall) and thromboembolic (TE) event rate. Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by HA level, and objective response rate. An early imbalance in TE events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold; thereafter, patients with TE events were excluded and enoxaparin prophylaxis was initiated. Results A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned; 246 had HA data; 231 were evaluable for efficacy; 84 (34%) had HA-high tumors (ie, extracellular matrix HA staining ≥ 50% of tumor surface at any intensity). PFS was significantly improved with PAG treatment overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.00; P = .049) and for patients with HA-high tumors (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.00; P = .048). In patients with HA-high tumors (PAG v AG), the objective response rate was 45% versus 31%, and median overall survival was 11.5 versus 8.5 months (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.61). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events with significant differences between arms (PAG v AG) included muscle spasms (13% v 1%), neutropenia (29% v 18%), and myalgia (5% v 0%). TE events were comparable after enoxaparin initiation (14% PAG v 10% AG). Conclusion This study met its primary end points of PFS and TE event rate. The largest improvement in PFS was observed in patients with HA-high tumors who received PAG. A similar TE event rate was observed between the treatment groups in stage 2 of the trial.

PURPOSE Pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) degrades hyaluronan (HA) and, in combination with chemotherapy, prolongs survival in preclinical models. The activity of PEGPH20 with modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) was evaluated in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients had untreated mPC, a performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function. Tumor HA status was not required for eligibility. After a phase Ib dose-finding study of mFOLFIRINOX plus PEGPH20, the phase II open-label study randomly assigned patients (1:1) to the combination arm or to mFOLFIRINOX alone (n = 138). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS PEGPH20 dosages of 3 µg/kg every 2 weeks were more tolerable than twice-weekly dosages used in the phase I study, so 3 µg/kg every 2 weeks was the phase II dosage. An amendment instituted enoxaparin prophylaxis in the PEGPH20 combination arm as a result of increased thromboembolic (TE) events. The planned interim futility analysis when 35 deaths (of 103 analyzable patients) occurred resulted in an OS hazard ratio (HR) of 2.07 that favored the control arm, and the study was closed to accrual. The treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicity was significantly increased in the PEGPH20 combination arm relative to control (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.1). The median OS in the mFOLFIRINOX arm was 14.4 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 15.7 months) versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 9.3 months) in the PEGPH20 combination arm. CONCLUSION Addition of PEGPH20 to mFOLFIRINOX seems to be detrimental in patients unselected for tumor HA status. This combination caused increased toxicity (mostly GI and TE events) and resulted in decreased treatment duration compared with mFOLFIRINOX alone. The median OS in the mFOLFIRINOX control arm (14.4 months) is, to our knowledge, the longest yet reported and can be considered for patients with good PS.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that is regarded as a tolerable and effective drug. When combined with radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, survival is significantly prolonged. This finding has led to widespread use of TMZ for patients with this disease. We summarize developing concerns regarding the use of TMZ, imaging of malignant gliomas, and the pharmacology of TMZ-mechanism of action, scheduling and strategies for overcoming resistance.

SUMMARY Importance KRAS mutations are very common in pancreatic cancer, but directly targeting the KRAS protein has thus far been unsuccessful. The aim of this trial was to block the MEK and PI3K/AKT pathways downstream of the KRAS protein as an alternate treatment strategy to slow cancer growth and prolong survival. This was the first cooperative group trial to evaluate this strategy using molecularly targeted oral combination therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy refractory pancreatic cancer. Objective SWOG S1115 was a randomized phase 2 study of selumetinib and MK-2206 versus modified FOLFOX in patients who failed gemcitabine-based therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Between September 2012 and May 2014, 137 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomized to selumetinib plus MK-2206 or mFOLFOX. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion and stratified according to duration of prior systemic therapy and presence of liver metastases. Interventions Patients received selumetinib 100 mg orally per day plus MK-2206 135 mg orally once per week or mFOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenous and 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 46–48 hours) on days 1 and 15 with each cycle being 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. Secondary objectives included evaluating toxicities, objective tumor response and progression free survival (PFS). Results Median OS was shorter in the experimental arm (3.9 vs 6.7 months, HR=1.37, p=0.15). PFS was also inferior in the experimental arm (HR=1.61, p=0.02). One vs five patients had a partial response and 12 vs 14 patients had stable disease in the selumetinib plus MK-2206 arm versus (vs) mFOLFOX. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in 39 patients treated with selumetinib and MK-2206 vs 23 patients treated with mFOLFOX. More patients on the experimental arm discontinued therapy due to adverse events, as well. Conclusions and Relevance Although, dual targeting of MEK and PI3K/AKT pathways downstream of KRAS by selumetinib plus MK-2206 did not improve overall survival in patients who failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, this was the first randomized prospective evaluation of mFOLFOX in the U.S. population which showed comparable results to CONKO-003 and PANCREOX. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01658943

RET fusions are oncogenic drivers of various tumors, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The safety and antitumor activity of the multikinase RET inhibitor RXDX-105 were explored in a phase I/Ib trial. A recommended phase II dose of 275 mg fed daily was identifi ed. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (25%), diarrhea (24%), hypophosphatemia (18%), maculopapular rash (18%), and nonmaculopapular rash (17%). In the phase Ib cohort of RET inhibitor-naïve patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLCs, the objective response rate (ORR) was 19% (95% CI, 8%-38%, n = 6/31). Interestingly, the ORR varied signifi cantly by the gene fusion partner ( P < 0.001, Fisher exact test): 0% (95% CI, 0%-17%, n = 0/20) with KIF5B (the most common upstream partner for RET fusion-positive NSCLC), and 67% (95% CI, 30%-93%, n = 6/9) with non-KIF5B partners. The median duration of response in all RET fusion-positive NSCLCs was not reached (range, 5 to 18+ months). SIGNIFICANCE:Although KIF5B-RET is the most common RET fusion in NSCLCs, RET inhibition with RXDX-105 resulted in responses only in non-KIF5B-RET-containing cancers. Novel approaches to targeting KIF5B-RET-containing tumors are needed, along with a deeper understanding of the biology that underlies the differential responses observed. RESULTS PatientsA total of 152 patients were treated with RXDX-105; 55 were treated in the phase I dose-escalation portion of the study, and 97 were treated in the phase Ib dose-expansion portion of the study ( Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1). The median age was 63 (range, 27-90) years, and the majority (89%) of patients were pretreated and received one or more prior systemic therapies. The most common tumor type Research.on August 5, 2020.doses that ranged from 20 mg daily up to a dose of 275 mg daily without dietary restrictions. In the last two cohorts, RXDX-105 was administered at 275 mg daily and 350 mg daily in the fed state.

There is an unmet clinical need for molecularly directed therapies available for metastatic colorectal cancer. Comprehensive genomic profiling has the potential to identify actionable genomic alterations in colorectal cancer. Through comprehensive genomic profiling we prospectively identified 6 RET fusion kinases, including two novel fusions of CCDC6-RET and NCOA4-RET, in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. RET fusion kinases represent a novel class of oncogenic driver in CRC and occurred at a 0.2% frequency without concurrent driver mutations, including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA or other fusion tyrosine kinases. Multiple RET kinase inhibitors were cytotoxic to RET fusion kinase positive cancer cells and not RET fusion kinase negative CRC cells. The presence of a RET fusion kinase may identify a subset of metastatic CRC patients with a high response rate to RET kinase inhibition. This is the first characterization of RET fusions in CRC patients and highlights the therapeutic significance of prospective comprehensive genomic profiling in advanced CRC.

BACKGROUND The AKT inhibitor MK-2206 at a dose of 60 mg every other day was evaluated in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancers. METHODS Patients who had progressed after first-line treatment were eligible. Pertinent eligibility criteria included adequate organ function, a fasting serum glucose level ≤ 150 mg/dL, and less than grade 2 malabsorption or chronic diarrhea. MK-2206 was given orally (60 evaluable patients required). The primary endpoint was overall survival, and a median survival of 6.5 months (power, 89%; significance level, 0.07) was considered encouraging for further investigation. RESULTS Seventy patients were included in the final analyses. The median age was 59.8 years (range, 30.4–86.7 years); 70% were male, 89% were white, and 7% were Asian. There were 2 deaths possibly related to the study drug (cardiac arrest and respiratory failure). Grade 4 adverse events included hyperglycemia, anemia, and lung infection (1 each). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in < 5% of patients except for fatigue (6%). Other adverse events (all grades) included anemia (17%), anorexia (30%), diarrhea (26%), fatigue (50%), hyperglycemia (30%), nausea (40%), vomiting (22%), dry skin (19%), maculopapular rash (30%), and acneiform rash (13%). The response rate was 1%, the median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.7–1.8 months), and the median overall survival was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7–9.4 months) CONCLUSIONS MK-2206 as second-line therapy was well tolerated by an unselected group of patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancers, but it did not have sufficient activity (response rate, 1%; overall survival, 5.1 months) to warrant further testing in this population.

4008 Background: Hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment produces elevated tumor pressure, vascular compression, and reduced drug delivery. PEGPH20 degrades HA, increasing the access and therapeutic index of anticancer agents. Methods: In Stage 1 of this phase II study, pts with untreated mPDA were randomized 1:1 to PAG (P; 3 µg/kg IV 2x/wk x 3 wks in C1, then 1x/wk x 3 wks in C2+, plus AG) vs AG every 28 days. An imbalance in thromboembolic (TE) events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold (~40% of pts discontinued PEGPH20), exclusion of pts at high risk for TE events and enoxaparin prophylaxis in both study arms. In Stage 2, randomization was 2:1 to PAG vs AG. Tumor HA was tested using a novel assay (VENTANA HA RxDx). Primary endpoints were PFS (evaluable pts) and TE event rate (Stage 2). Secondary endpoints were PFS by HA level and ORR. Results: 279 pts were randomized; 231 are evaluable for efficacy. Of 246 pts with HA data, 84 (34%) were HA-High. As of December 16, 2016, the primary PFS endpoint was statistically significant for PAG vs AG (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.00; p = 0.048) (Table). PFS in HA-High pts was also statistically significant in the PAG vs AG arm (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.00; p = 0.048). ORR in HA-High pts was 46% (PAG) vs 34% (AG). Overall survival in HA-High pts (exploratory) was 11.5 months (mo) (PAG) and 8.5 mo (AG) (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.61). TE events were similar (PAG 14% vs AG 10%) following enoxaparin initiation. All grade treatment-related AE included peripheral edema (PAG 63% vs AG 26%), muscle spasms (56% vs 3%), neutropenia (34% vs 19%), and myalgia (26% vs 7%). Conclusions: Randomized Phase II study met both primary endpoints (PFS and TE event rate), with the largest improvement in the secondary endpoint of PFS in HA-High pts. These data support HA as a potential predictive biomarker for patient selection of PEGPH20, currently investigated in the ongoing global Phase III HALO 301 study with PFS and OS as co-primary endpoints. Clinical trial information: NCT01839487. [Table: see text]