Aims The myogenic reactivity of the middle cerebral arteries (MCA) protects the brain by altering the diameter in response to changes in lumen pressure. Large conductance potassium (BK) channels are known to regulate the myogenic reactivity, yet, it is not clear how aging alters the myogenic reactivity via the BK channel in males and females. Thus, we hypothesize that age-associated changes in BK channel subunits modulate the myogenic reactivity in a sex-specific manner. Methods and results We used vascular reactivity, patch-clamp, and biochemical methods to measure myogenic reactivity, BK channel function, and expression, respectively in cerebral vessels of adult and aged male and female Sprague Dawley rats. Our results suggest that aging and ovariectomy (OVX) exaggerated the myogenic reactivity of MCA in females but attenuated it in males. Aging induced outward eutrophic remodelling in females but inward hypertrophic remodelling in males. Aging decreased total, Kv, BK channel currents, and spontaneous transient outward currents (STOC) in vascular smooth muscle cells isolated from females, but not in males. Aging increased BKα subunit mRNA and protein both in males and females. However, aging decreased BKβ1 subunit protein and mRNA in females only. In males, BKβ1 mRNA is increased, but protein is decreased. Iberiotoxin-induced MCA constriction is lower in aged females but higher in aged males. Activation of BKα (10 µM NS1619) and BKβ1 (10 µM S-Equol) subunits failed to increase STOCs and were unable to decrease the myogenic reactivity of MCA in aged female but not in aged male rats. OVX decreased, but chronic supplementation of oestradiol restored BK channel expression and function. Conclusion Overall our results suggest that aging or OVX-associated downregulation of the BKβ1 expression and function in females results in exaggerated myogenic reactivity of MCA. However, age-associated increase in BK channel function in males attenuated myogenic reactivity of MCA.
Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists are highly efficacious for the treatment of pain but have significant abuse liability. Recently, we reported that nalfurafine, when combined with oxycodone at a certain ratio, reduced the reinforcing effects of oxycodone in rats while producing additive antinociceptive effects. Questions remain, however, including if the combination will function as a reinforcer in drug-naïve rats, and if the combination produces aversive effects that could explain nalfurafine’s ability to reduce oxycodone self-administration? In the present study, we investigated nalfurafine’s ability to reduce acquisition of oxycodone self-administration when the two were self-administered as a mixture in drug-naïve rats and nalfurafine’s ability to attenuate a conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by oxycodone. In the self-administration study, male Sprague–Dawley rats self-administered intravenous injections of oxycodone (0.056 mg/kg/injection), an oxycodone/nalfurafine combination (0.056/0.0032 mg/kg/injection), or saline under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement for 20 days to compare rates of acquisition of drug taking. In the CPP assay, male Sprague–Dawley rats received subcutaneous injections of either saline, oxycodone (3.2 mg/kg), nalfurafine (0.18 mg/kg), or an oxycodone/nalfurafine combination at the same ratio used in the self-administration study (3.2 mg/kg/0.18 mg/kg). All subjects self-administering oxycodone alone met acquisition criteria. However, only 13% of subjects self-administering oxycodone/nalfurafine met criteria, and no subjects acquired self-administration of saline. Oxycodone, but not nalfurafine alone or the oxycodone/nalfurafine combination, produced rewarding effects in rats in the CPP test. These findings suggest that the combination of oxycodone and nalfurafine will be less habit forming in opioid-naïve patients than oxycodone alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.