This work reports the relative importance of the interactions provided by three catalytic residues to individual steps in the mechanism of citrate synthase. When the side chains of any of the residues (H320, D375, and H274) are mutated, the data indicate that they are involved in the stabilization of one or more of the transition/intermediate states in the multistep citrate synthase reaction. H320 forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl of oxaloacetate and the alcohols of the citryl-coenzyme A and citrate products. Enzymes substituted at H320 (Q, G, N, and R) have reaction profiles for which the condensation reaction is cleanly rate determining. None of these mutants can activate the carbonyl of oxaloacetate by polarization. All these mutants catalyze the necessary proton transfer from the methyl group of acetyl-coenzyme A only poorly, a process which occurs in a structurally separate site. Furthermore, all H320 mutants hydrolyze the citryl-coenzyme A intermediate significantly more slowly than does the wild-type. D375 is the base removing the proton of acetyl-coenzyme A. D375E and D375G have greatly diminished ability to catalyze proton transfer from acetyl-CoA. The D375 mutants polarize the oxaloacetate carbonyl as well as wild-type. For D375E, the hydrolysis of citryl-CoA is rate determining. D375G, having no side chain capable of acid-base chemistry in either the condensation or hydrolysis reactions is nearly completely devoid of activity in any of the reactions catalyzed by the wild-type. H274 hydrogen bonds to the carbonyl of acetyl-coenzyme A but also forms the back wall of the oxaloacetate-binding site. H274G cannot properly activate either oxaloacetate or acetyl-coenzyme A, and the condensation reaction is overwhelmingly rate determining. Nonetheless, hydrolysis of the intermediate is impaired. All the enzymes except H320R and H274G show kinetic cooperativity with CitCoA as substrate, indicating changes in the subunit interactions with these latter two mutants. The energetics of citrate synthase are surprisingly tightly coupled. All changes affect more than one step in the catalytic cycle. Within the condensation reaction, the intermediate of proton transfer must occupy a shallow well between transition states close in free energy so that perturbations of one have substantial effects on that of the other.

The catalytic strategies of enzymes (such as citrate synthase) whose reactions require the abstraction of the alpha-proton of a carbon acid remain elusive. Citrate synthase readily catalyzes solvent proton exchange of the methyl protons of dethiaacetyl-coenzyme A, a sulfur-less, ketone analog of acetyl-coenzyme A, in its ternary complex with oxaloacetate. Because no further reaction occurs with this analog, it provides a uniquely simple probe of the roles of active site interactions on carbon acid proton transfer catalysis. In view of the high reactivity of the analog for proton transfer to the active site base, its failure to further condense with oxaloacetate to form a sulfur-less analog of citryl-coenzyme A was unexpected, although we offer several possible explanations. We have measured the rate constants for exchange, k(exch), at saturating concentrations of the analog for six citrate synthase mutants with single changes in active site residues. Comparisons between the values of k(exch) are straightforward in two limits. If the rate of exchange of the transferred proton with solvent protons is rapid, then k(exch) equals the forward rate constant for proton transfer, and k(exch) values for different mutants compare directly the rate constants for proton transfer. If the exchange of the transferred proton with protons in the bulk solution is the slow step and the equilibrium constant for proton transfer is unfavorable (as is likely), then k(exch) equals the product of the equilibrium constant for proton transfer and the rate constant for exchange of the transferred proton with bulk solvent. If that exchange rate with bulk solution remains constant for a series of mutant enzymes, then k(exch) values compare the equilibrium constants for proton transfer. The importance of the acetyl-CoA site residues, H274 and D375, is confirmed with D375 again implicated as the active site base. The results with the series of oxaloacetate site mutants, H320X, strongly suggest that activation of the first substrate, oxaloacetate, through carbonyl bond polarization, not just oxaloacetate binding in the active site, is required for the enzyme to efficiently catalyze proton transfer from the methyl group of the second substrate.

The active site of pig heart citrate synthase contains a histidine residue (H320) which interacts with the carbonyl oxygen of oxaloacetate and is implicated in substrate activation through carbonyl bond polarization, a major catalytic strategy of the enzyme. We report here the effects on the catalytic mechanism of changing this important residue to glycine. H320G shows modest impairment in substrate Michaelis constants [(7-16)-fold] and a large decrease in catalysis (600-fold). For the native enzyme, the chemical intermediate, citryl-CoA, is both hydrolyzed and converted back to reactants, oxaloacetate and acetyl-CoA. In the mutant, citryl-CoA is only hydrolyzed, indicating a major defect in the condensation reaction. As monitored by the carbonyl carbon's chemical shift, the extent of oxaloacetate carbonyl polarization is decreased in all binary and ternary complexes. As indicated by the lack of rapid H320G--oxaloacetate catalysis of the exchange of the methyl protons of acetyl-CoA or the pro-S-methylene proton of propionyl-CoA, the activation of acetyl-CoA is also faulty. Reflecting this defect in acetyl-CoA activation, the carboxyl chemical shift of H320G-bound carboxymethyl-CoA (a transition-state analog of the neutral enol intermediate) fails to decrease on formation of the H3020G-oxaloacetate-carboxymethyl-CoA ternary complex. Progress curves and steady-state data with H320G using citryl-CoA as substrate show unusual properties: substrate inhibition and accelerating progress curves. Either one of two models with subunit cooperativity [Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J.-P. (1965) J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88; Koshland, D. E., Jr., Nemethy, G., & Filmer, D. (1966) Biochemistry 5, 365] quantitatively accounts for both the initial velocity data and the individual progress curves. The concentrations of all enzyme forms and complexes are assumed to rapidly reach their equilibrium values compared to the rate of substrate turnover. The native enzyme also behaves according to models for subunit cooperativity with citryl-CoA as substrate. However, the rates of formation/dissociation and reaction of complexes are kinetically significant. Comparisons of the values of kinetic constants between the native and mutants enzymes lead us to conclude that the mutant less readily undergoes a conformation change required for efficient activation of substrates.