Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important comorbidity of chronic kidney disease, and reducing cardiovascular events in this population is an important goal for the clinicians who care for chronic kidney disease patients. The high risk for CVD in transplant recipients is in part explained by the high prevalence of conventional CVD risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) in this patient population. Current transplant success allows recipients with previous contraindications to transplant to have access to this procedure with more frequency and safety. Herein we provide a series of eight patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with poor ejection fraction posted for live donor renal transplantation which was successfully performed under regional anesthesia with sedation.

Background and Aims: Pre-anesthesia checkup (PAC) gives unique opportunity for providing necessary information, patient education and allaying anxiety. Our objective was to measure the effect of preoperative multimedia video information (self made short video of 12 minutes) on patient's anxiety and hemodynamic parameters during surgery under spinal anesthesia. Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted in 80 patients of either sex with ASA physical status I and II posted for lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patents were randomized to control or test group. At the end of preoperative visit, patients in test group watched the film and patient in control group did not watch any video. Verbal briefing by the attending anesthesiologist on the day of surgery was given to all patients of both the groups. Anxiety using Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and hemodynamic parameters (SBP, DBP and HR) at various time intervals (A1: Baseline, A2: post intervention, A3: just before surgery, A4: after surgery) were measured. Results: Baseline anxiety (A1) scores were severe in both the groups and showed no statistical significance ( P = 0.436). Patients in test group (video) showed better/lower anxiety levels than the control group (non video) at A2 ( P = 0.020) and A3 ( P = 0.005) respectively, similarly hemodynamic parameters were better controlled and showed lesser deviation from baseline values in test group as compared to control group and showed statistical significant difference ( P < 0.001) just before surgery. Conclusion: Combination of multimedia based video information at the time of PAC and short verbal briefing on the day of surgery by the attending anesthesiologist provides effective management of perioperative anxiety. It can be cost effective way of enhancing patient care and providing adequate information to people with reading and comprehension difficulties.

FTc-guided intraoperative fluid therapy achieved the same rate of immediate graft function as CVP-guided fluid therapy but used a significantly less amount of fluid. The incidence of postoperative complications related to fluid overload was also reduced. The use of TED may replace invasive central line insertions in the future.

Introduction: Prolonged mechanical ventilation in postoperative obstetric patients is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Choosing intravenous sedation for these patients is challenging, as many of these drugs have unique benefits and adverse effects.There are several options are available like benzodiazepines, propofol, alfa-2 agonist, opioids and ketamine. Usually, a combination of sedatives are used to avoid dose dependent adverse effects. Aim: To evaluate the combination of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine (KD) and ketamine-propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated obstetric patients to compare haemodynamic changes. Secondary objectives to assess adverse effects if any, additional opioid (fentanyl) requirement and total length of intensive care unit stay. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was conducted at King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, from May 2018 to August 2019. Total 67 obstetric patients, between 18-45 years of age, requiring postoperative ventilatory support, were included in the study. For sedation, 33 patient received ketamine-dexmedetomidine (group I) combination and 34 patients received ketamine-propofol (group II) combination upto 12 hours of ventilatory support. Target of sedation was to obtain Ramsay sedation scoring between 3-4. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was measured at 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and at every 2 hourly till 12 hours. Pain was assessed using adult non verbal pain score. Adverse effects (tachyarrhythmia, agitation and hypersalivation) were noted. Total length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay was also recorded. Results: Age of patients enrolled in the study ranged from 20 to 37 years, the mean age being 27.09±4.61 years. At baseline mean arterial pressure of patients of group I (103.82±19.26 mmHg) was higher than that of group II (96.74±13.49 mmHg) (p-value=0.085). For the rest of the periods of observation, from 0.5 hour to 14 hour,the MAP of group I remained higher as compared to group II. On intragroup comparison, group II had more fluctuation in MAP than group I. Additional requirement of fentanyl was significantly high in Group II, as compared to group I (32.4% vs. 12.1%). Mean duration of ICU stay was higher in group II, as compared to group I (30.44±7.26 hours vs 22.91±4.03 hours). Conclusion: Ketamine-dexmedetomidine is a better combination for sedation in postoperated obstetric patients on mechanical ventilation than ketamine-propofol as it provides stable haemodynamics, significantly lesser opioid requirement andtotal length of ICU stay.

Background: This study was designed to compare the prevention of emergence agitation (EA) of sevoflurane anesthesia by an intraoperative bolus or low-dose infusion of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients, aged 2–12 years, undergoing lower abdominal surgeries with sevoflurane anesthesia were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous bolus over 10 min. 0.4 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group I, n = 24) or low-dose infusion 0.4 μg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine (Group II, n = 24) after intubation. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded before induction, at induction and every 5 min after induction. Observational pain scores (OPS), pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scores, and Ramsay sedation scores (RSS) were recorded on arrival to the postanesthesia care unit and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 min thereafter. Extubation time, emergence time, and time to reach Aldrete score ≥9 were recorded. Results: OPS and PAED scores and percentage of patients with OPS ≥4 or PAED scale ≥10 were significantly higher in Group II as compared to Group I. RSS score, extubation time, emergence time, and time to reach Aldrete score ≥9 did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: Both bolus or low-dose infusion of dexmedetomidine was effective for the prevention of EA with sevoflurane anesthesia, but bolus dose of dexmedetomidine was more effective.