BackgroundIndications for intra-osseous (IO) infusion are increasing in adults requiring administration of fluids and medications during initial resuscitation. However, this route is rarely used nowadays due to a lack of knowlegde and training. We reviewed the current evidence for its use in adults requiring resuscitative procedures, the contraindications of the technique, and modalities for catheter implementation and skill acquisition.MethodsA PubMed search for all articles published up to December 2015 was performed by using the terms “Intra-osseous” AND “Adult”. Additional articles were included by using the “related citations” feature of PubMed or checking references of selected articles. Editorials, comments and case reports were excluded. Abstracts of all the articles that the search yielded were independently screened for eligibility by two authors and included in the analysis after mutual consensus. In total, 84 full-text articles were reviewed and 49 of these were useful for answering the following question “when, how, and for which population should an IO infusion be used in adults” were selected to prepare independent drafts. Once this step had been completed, all authors met, reviewed the drafts together, resolved disagreements by consensus with all the authors, and decided on the final version.ResultsIO infusion should be implemented in all critical situations when peripheral venous access is not easily obtainable. Contraindications are few and complications are uncommon, most of the time bound to prolonged use. The IO infusion allows for blood sampling and administration of virtually all types of fluids and medications including vasopressors, with a bioavailability close to the intravenous route. Unfortunately, IO infusion remains underused in adults even though learning the technique is rapid and easy.ConclusionsIndications for IO infusion use in adults requiring urgent parenteral access and having difficult intravenous access are increasing. Physicians working in emergency departments or intensive care units should learn the procedures for catheter insertion and maintenance, the contraindications of the technique, and the possibilities this access offers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1277-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aims We aimed to describe the epidemiological, biological, and bacteriological characteristics of osteoarticular infections (OAIs) caused by Kingella kingae. Methods The medical charts of all children presenting with OAIs to our institution over a 13-year period (January 2007 to December 2019) were reviewed. Among these patients, we extracted those which presented an OAI caused by K. kingae and their epidemiological data, biological results, and bacteriological aetiologies were assessed. Results K. kingae was the main reported microorganism in our paediatric population, being responsible for 48.7% of OAIs confirmed bacteriologically. K. kingae affects primarily children aged between six months and 48 months. The highest prevalence of OAI caused by K. kingae was between seven months and 24 months old. After the patients were 27 months old, its incidence decreased significantly. The incidence though of infection throughout the year showed no significant differences. Three-quarters of patients with an OAI caused by K. kingae were afebrile at hospital admission, 11% had elevated WBCs, and 61.2% had abnormal CRPs, whereas the ESR was increased in 75%, constituting the most significant predictor of an OAI. On MRI, we noted 53% of arthritis affecting mostly the knee and 31% of osteomyelitis located primarily in the foot. Conclusion K. kingae should be recognized currently as the primary pathogen causing OAI in children younger than 48 months old. Diagnosis of an OAI caused by K. kingae is not always obvious, since this infection may occur with a mild-to-moderate clinical and biological inflammatory response. Extensive use of nucleic acid amplification assays improved the detection of fastidious pathogens and has increased the observed incidence of OAI, especially in children aged between six months and 48 months. We propose the incorporation of polymerase chain reaction assays into modern diagnostic algorithms for OAIs to better identify the bacteriological aetiology of OAIs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):578–583.

Background and context: Surgical procedures are evolving toward less invasive and more tailored approaches to consider the specific pathology, morphology, and life habits of a patient. However, these new surgical methods require thorough preoperative planning and an advanced understanding of biomechanical behaviors. In this sense, patient-specific modeling is developing in the form of digital twins to help personalized clinical decision-making.Purpose: This study presents a patient-specific finite element model approach, focusing on tibial plateau fractures, to enhance biomechanical knowledge to optimize surgical trauma procedures and improve decision-making in postoperative management.Study design: This is a level 5 study.Methods: We used a postoperative 3D X-ray image of a patient who suffered from depression and separation of the lateral tibial plateau. The surgeon stabilized the fracture with polymethyl methacrylate cement injection and bi-cortical screw osteosynthesis. A digital twin of the patient’s fracture was created by segmentation. From the digital twin, four stabilization methods were modeled including two screw lengths, whether or not, to inject PMMA cement. The four stabilization methods were associated with three bone healing conditions resulting in twelve scenarios. Mechanical strength, stress distribution, interfragmentary strains, and fragment kinematics were assessed by applying the maximum load during gait. Repeated fracture risks were evaluated regarding to the volume of bone with stress above the local yield strength and regarding to the interfragmentary strains.Results: Stress distribution analysis highlighted the mechanical contribution of cement injection and the favorable mechanical response of uni-cortical screw compared to bi-cortical screw. Evaluation of repeated fracture risks for this clinical case showed fracture instability for two of the twelve simulated scenarios.Conclusion: This study presents a patient-specific finite element modeling workflow to assess the biomechanical behaviors associated with different stabilization methods of tibial plateau fractures. Strength and interfragmentary strains were evaluated to quantify the mechanical effects of surgical procedures. We evaluate repeated fracture risks and provide data for postoperative management.