Neuromuscular blocking agents have been implicated in 60-70% of anaphylactic events associated with anaesthesia. We report two cases of probable hypersensitivity reaction to sugammadex and an additional suspected but less supported case of possible immune-mediated reaction or other adverse reaction. The patients were given a bolus of sugammadex 100 mg immediately before extubation. In all three patients, a possible allergic reaction was suspected within 4 min of sugammadex administration, but with different degrees of severity. Skin testing was positive in two of these patients. Hypersensitivity to sugammadex unaccompanied by cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms might be missed during the course of anaesthesia. Careful monitoring for possible allergic responses is required in patients who have received sugammadex.

This study showed a significant increase in the PVI and a negative correlation between the changes in PVI and PI before and after the skin incision. The PVI can be calculated from the variations in the PI caused not by mechanical ventilation, but rather by fluctuations in vasomotor tone. When using the PVI as an indicator for fluid responsiveness, it is crucial to pay attention to fluctuations in vasomotor tone induced by nociceptive stimuli.

Perfusion index was significantly lower in patients with postanesthetic shivering before emergence from anesthesia, indicating that measurement of perfusion index during and before the end of anesthesia might be a useful means of predicting postanesthetic shivering.

† Sugammadex is increasingly used for the reversal of rocuronium neuromuscular block. † Report of three cases showing evidence of an allergic response immediately after sugammadex. † Two patients had a subsequent positive skin test to sugammadex, the third declined testing. Summary. Neuromuscular blocking agents have been implicated in 60-70% of anaphylactic events associated with anaesthesia. We report two cases of probable hypersensitivity reaction to sugammadex and an additional suspected but less supported case of possible immune-mediated reaction or other adverse reaction. The patients were given a bolus of sugammadex 100 mg immediately before extubation. In all three patients, a possible allergic reaction was suspected within 4 min of sugammadex administration, but with different degrees of severity. Skin testing was positive in two of these patients. Hypersensitivity to sugammadex unaccompanied by cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms might be missed during the course of anaesthesia. Careful monitoring for possible allergic responses is required in patients who have received sugammadex.

Our data suggest that the BH4 values were significantly increased in several organs, especially in the liver during endotoxic shock. Impaired cardiac output and decreased blood pressure appeared in the early phase of porcine endotoxemia. Longer-term observation of these parameters after LPS treatment should be performed as the next step in future studies.