The reasons why a physical therapist assistant student does not advance in a technical program are multifactorial. The curriculum design of a program is one of many factors that can potentially mitigate against students' progression in a program. The previous literature has only assessed the characteristics of physical therapist assistant students, faculty, and programs in relation to graduates' success in passing the National Physical Therapist Examination. A retrospective program evaluation was performed to investigate how the length of courses (i.e., 7week vs. 15-week) in the first technical semester of a physical therapist assistant program affected student progression in the program. The population for this study consisted of two cohorts of physical therapist assistant students at one community college. Both cohorts had 34 students. The results for this study suggest that students who participated in the 7-week course had a statistically better retention rate in the first technical term of a physical therapist assistant program, but there was no difference in course or term grade point average than students who participated in a 15-week course. The program studied can utilize the results of this research to validate the benefits and the negative impacts of a compressed course design for a program to improve program retention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.