Objective To describe the amount and content of group therapies provided during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI), and assess the relationships of group therapy with patient, injury, and treatment factors as well as outcomes. Design Prospective observational cohort. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation. Participants 2,130 consecutive admissions for initial TBI rehabilitation at 10 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (9 in US and 1 Canada) from October 2008 to September 2011. Interventions n/a Main Outcome Measure(s) proportion of sessions that were group therapy (two or more patients were treated simultaneously by one or more clinicians); proportion of patients receiving group therapy; type of activity performed and amount of time spent in group therapy, by discipline; rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS); discharge location; FIM Cognitive and Motor scores at discharge. Results 79% of patients received at least 1 session of group therapy, with group therapy accounting for 13.7% of all therapy sessions and 15.8% of therapy hours. On average, patients spent 2.9 hours per week in group therapy. The greatest proportion of treatment time in group format was in Therapeutic Recreation (25.6%), followed by Speech Therapy (16.2%), Occupational Therapy (10.4%), Psychology (8.1%), and Physical Therapy (7.9%). Group therapy time and type of treatment activities varied among admission FIM cognitive subgroups and treatment sites. Several factors appear to be predictive of receiving group therapy, with treatment site being a major influence. However, group therapy as a whole offered little explanation of differences in the outcomes studied. Conclusion(s) Group therapy is commonly used in TBI rehabilitation, to varying degrees among disciplines, sites, and cognitive impairment subgroups. Various therapeutic activities take place in group therapy, indicating its perceived value in addressing many domains of functioning. Variation in outcomes is not explained well by overall percent of therapy time delivered in groups.
Purpose To examine the prevalence of post-stroke depression (PSD) among African American stroke survivors and the association of depression with functional status at inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) discharge. Methods Secondary data analysis was conducted of a patient cohort who received care at three IRFs in the United States from 2009–2011. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations of PSD and FIM motor and cognitive scores. Results Of 458 African American stroke survivors, 48.5% were female, 84% had an ischemic stroke, and the mean age was 60.8 ± 13.6 years. Only 15.4% (n=71) had documentation of PSD. Bivariate analyses to identify factors associated with depression identified a higher percentage of patients with depression than without who were retired due to disability (17.1% vs. 11.6%) or employed (31.4% vs. 19.6%) pre-stroke (p=0.041). Dysphagia, cognitive deficits, and a lower admission motor FIM score were also significantly more common among those with depression. There was no significant relationship between depression and functional status after adjusting for patient characteristics. Conclusions In this study 15% of the African Americans who received rehabilitation after a stroke had documentation of PSD but this was not associated with functional status at discharge.
Objective: To determine the relationship between comorbid health conditions and the trajectory of functional recovery 5 years following traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. Setting: Two acute rehabilitation facilities. Participants: A total of 407 patients with primary diagnosis of TBI. Design: Prospective, observational. Main Measures: Functional Independence Measure Cognitive and Motor scores. Results: Female gender was negatively associated with the trajectory of motor recovery (P < .001). TBI severity was negatively associated with both motor and cognitive recovery and interacted with time after injury (both Ps < .0001). Hypertension was negatively associated with both motor (P < .0001) and cognitive (P = .0121) recovery, although this relationship diminished over time for motor function (P = .0447). Cardiac conditions were negatively associated with motor recovery (P = .0204), and rate of cognitive recovery was more rapid for patients with cardiac conditions (P = .0088). Depressed patients recovered cognitive function more quickly than those who were not depressed (P = .0196). Diabetes was negatively associated with motor function (P = .0088). Drug/alcohol use was positively associated with motor function (P = .0036). Conclusions: Injury severity remains an important predictor of long-term recovery; however, certain comorbid medical conditions are negatively associated with functional abilities over the first 5 years after injury. Patients being discharged from TBI rehabilitation with comorbid cardiac, hypertensive, diabetic, and/or depressive conditions may benefit from early and ongoing clinical surveillance.
Attention to health care quality and safety has increased dramatically. The internal focus of an organization is not without influence from external policy and research findings. Compared with other specialties, efforts to align and advance rehabilitation research, practice, and policy using electronic health record data are in the early stages. This special communication defines quality, applies the dimensions of quality to rehabilitation, and illustrates the feasibility and utility of electronic health record data for research on rehabilitation care quality and outcomes. Using data generated at the point of care provides the greatest opportunity for improving the quality of health care, producing generalizable evidence to inform policy and practice, and ultimately benefiting the health of the populations served.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.