BackgroundPatients undergoing craniotomy operations are prone to various noxious stimuli, many strategies are commenced to provide state of analgesia, for better control of the stress response and to overcome its undesired effects on the haemodynamics and post-operative pain. Scalp nerves block are considered one of these strategies. This study was conceived to evaluate the effect of addition of hyaluronidase to the local anaesthetic mixture used in the scalp nerves block in patients undergoing elective craniotomy operations.Methods64 patients undergoing elective craniotomy operations were enrolled in this prospective randomized, double-blind comparative study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LA, patients subjected to scalp nerves block with 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 15 ml lidocaine 2%, in 1:400000 epinephrine. Group H as Group LA with15 IU /ml Hyaluronidase.ResultsPatients in the H group showed lower VAS values for 8 h postoperative, compared to the LA group. The haemodynamic response showed lower values in the H group, compared to the LA group. Those effects were shown in the intraoperative period and for 6 h post-operative. No difference was detected regarding the incidence of complications nor the safety profile.ConclusionOur data supports the idea that addition of hyaluronidase to the local anesthetic mixture improves the success rates of the scalp nerves block and its efficacy especially during stressful intraoperative periods and in the early postoperative period. No evident undesirable effects in relation to the addition of hyaluronidase.Trial registrationClinical Trial registry on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 03411330, 25-1-2018.
AIM:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of mini abdominoplasty with liposuction under local tumescent anaesthesia (LA) as the sole anaesthetic modality.METHODS:The study included 60 female patients with a mean age of 33.3 ± 5.6 years. Local infiltration using a mixture of 1:1000 epinephrine (1 ml), 2% lidocaine (100 ml) and 0.5% Levobupivacaine (50 ml) in 2500 ml saline was started with Local infiltration started with the abdomen, outer thigh, hips, back, inner thighs and knees. After Mini Abdominoplasty with supplemental liposuction was conducted and application of suction drains wound closure was performed, and the tight bandage was applied. Pain during injection, incision and surgical manipulations was determined. Duration of postoperative analgesia, till oral intake and return home, patients and surgeon satisfaction scores were determined.RESULTS:All surgeries were conducted completely without conversion to general anaesthesia. Injection pain was mild in 46 patients, moderate in 10 and hardly tolerated in 4 patients. Incision pain was mild in 16 patients, while 44 patients reported no sensation. During the surgical procedure, 6 patients required an additional dose of LA. Meantime till resumption of oral intake was 1.6 ± 0.9 hours. Meantime till home return was 5.6 ± 2.4 hours. Twelve patients were highly satisfied, 18 patients were satisfied, and these 42 patients were willing to repeat the trial if required. Eight patients found the trial is good and only one patient refused to repeat the trial and was dissatisfied, for a mean total satisfaction score of 3.1 ± 0.9.CONCLUSION:Mini Abdominoplasty with liposuction could be conducted safely under tumescent LA with mostly pain-free intraoperative and PO courses and allowed such surgical procedure to be managed as an office procedure. The applied anaesthetic procedure provided patients’ satisfaction with varying degrees in about 97% of studied patients.
Objectives:To evaluate the prophylactic effect of norepinephrine (NE) and vasopressin (VP) infusion on frequency and severity of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH). Patients and methods: A total of 240 young male patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups: Group C received plain saline infusion, Group NE received NE infusion (0.1 mg/ml; 3 ml/h) and Group VP received VP infusion (0.5 U/ml; 1 U/h); all infusions started synchronously with spinal injection (SI). Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) measures were determined at 1, 4, 7 and 10-min; then every 5-min for 30 min. SAP reduction of >10% was treated by supplementary fluid therapy and resistant cases or patients who had SAP reduction of ≥20% received ephedrine (10 mg). Results: In comparison with baseline SAP, SAP was decreased by > 20% in eight control patients, by < 10% in 22 patients and in 50 control patients SAP decrease ranged between 10% and 20%. In the NE and VP groups, no patient had decreased SAP of > 10%, while 15 patients had increased SAP of > 10% and 145 patients showed no SAP change with significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0003). Throughout the 30 min after spinal block, all SAP and HR measures of control patients were significantly (p = 0.001) lower compared with their baseline measures and with corresponding measures of patients of the NE and VP groups with non-significant difference between the two groups. Seven patients (8.8%) in the control group had nausea and three (3.8%) had nausea and vomiting, while no patient in the NE and VP groups had nausea or required anti-emetic therapy. Conclusion: Vasopressor infusion given synchronously with spinal injection is an appropriate prophylactic policy against SAIH. NE infusion did better than VP infusion and provided better haemodynamic stability after spinal injection. However, VP infusion allowed control of blood pressure despite the significant decrease till 7 min after SI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.