Background/Purpose Many factors appear to be related to physical activity after stroke, yet it is unclear how these factors interact and which ones might be the best predictors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to examine the relationship between walking capacity and walking activity, and 2) to investigate how biopsychosocial factors and self-efficacy relate to walking activity, above and beyond walking capacity impairment post-stroke. Methods Individuals greater than 3 months post-stroke (n=55) completed the Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Modified Cumulative Illness Rating (MCIR) Scale, Walk 12, Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and oxygen consumption testing. Walking activity data was collected via a StepWatch Activity Monitor (SAM). Predictors were grouped into 3 constructs: (1) Walking Capacity: oxygen consumption and FGA; (2) Biopsychosocial: GDS, FSS, and MCIR; (3) Self-Efficacy: Walk 12 and ABC. Moderated sequential regression models were used to examine what factors best predicted walking activity. Results Walking capacity explained 35.9% (p<0.001) of the variance in walking activity. Self-efficacy (ΔR2 = 0.15, p<0.001) and the interaction between the FGA*ABC (ΔR2 = 0.047, p<0.001) significantly increased the variability explained. FGA (β=0.37, p=0.01), MCIR (β=−0.26, p=0.01), and Walk 12 (β=−0.45, p=0.00) were each individually significantly associated with walking activity. Discussion/Conclusion While measures of walking capacity and self-efficacy significantly contributed to "real-world" walking activity, balance self-efficacy moderated the relationship between walking capacity and walking activity. Improving low balance self-efficacy may augment walking capacity and translate to improved walking activity post-stroke.
BackgroundStroke survivors are more physically inactive than even the most sedentary older adults, and low activity is associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke, medical complications, and mortality. We hypothesize that the combination of a fast walking intervention that improves walking capacity, with a step activity monitoring program that facilitates translation of gains from the clinic to the “real-world”, would generate greater improvements in real world walking activity than with either intervention alone.MethodsUsing a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design, 225 chronic (> 6 months) stroke survivors complete 12 weeks of fast walking training, a step activity monitoring program or a fast walking training + step activity monitoring program. Main eligibility criteria include: chronic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (> 6 months post), no evidence of cerebellar stroke, baseline walking speed between 0.3 m/s and 1.0 m/s, and baseline average steps / day < 8000. The primary (steps per day), secondary (self-selected and fastest walking speed, walking endurance, oxygen consumption) and exploratory (vascular events, blood lipids, glucose, blood pressure) outcomes are assessed prior to initiating treatment, after the last treatment and at a 6 and 12-month follow-up. Moderation of the changes in outcomes by baseline characteristics are evaluated to determine for whom the interventions are effective.DiscussionFollowing completion of this study, we will not only understand the efficacy of the interventions and the individuals for which they are effective, we will have the necessary information to design a study investigating the secondary prevention benefits of improved physical activity post-stroke. This study is, therefore, an important step in the development of both rehabilitative and secondary prevention guidelines for persons with stroke.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02835313.First Posted: July 18, 2016.
These findings demonstrate, for the first time (to our knowledge), the ability of a single session of gait training with FES to induce positive corticomotor plasticity in people in the chronic stage of stroke recovery. They also provide insight into the neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying improvements in biomechanical walking function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.