This paper demonstrates how print media sources frame the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street in ways that, consciously or not, support the prevailing status quo – social, economic, and political elites. The study employs critical discourse analysis (CDA) as the analytic framework, investigating how print media (sometimes referred to as ‘print capitalism’) utilized framing techniques that disparaged the two political organizations but in very different ways. The analysis incorporates articles appearing in the New York Post and the New York Times from the inception of each organization, through six weeks after the 2012 Presidential Inauguration; articles were coded to uncover themes that defined both organizations as ‘outsiders.’ Tea Partiers are characterized as irrational demagogues, while Occupy Wall Street (OWS) activities are criminalized; both are dismissed as irrelevant, leaving the predominant ‘mainstream’ political rule intact. Findings identify tools of discourse used by media to limit the influence of competing movements while essentially protecting the status quo. Revealing these tools provides clues to unreliable discourse in media coverage of presidential candidates, which tends to quash open debate and threaten principles of participatory government.
Headlines report allegations of racial disparity by law enforcement. Scholars support these claims, although with little empirical evidence. This research analyzes over 700,000 public contacts by the Los Angeles Police Department to evaluate levels of racial disparity using two benchmarks: 1) racial proportions of the general population of the city and 2) racial proportions of persons described in violent crime. The analysis includes review of a Los Angeles Times study that used the general population as the only benchmark. Assessing validity of benchmarks and implications for inexact comparisons is discussed. The findings demonstrate that disparity based on a population benchmark does not correlate as well as involvement in violent crime. This research offers examples of how disparity caused by discrimination can be mediated through public complaints and body-worn cameras.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.