BackgroundAnaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that may cause death. The signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis have not been examined in the Saudi population before.ObjectiveThe present study examined the signs, symptoms, triggers, and demographic patterns of patients treated for anaphylaxis at a large tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.MethodsAll the patients who were prescribed new prescriptions of adrenaline auto-injectors (AAs) between February 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011 were included in this study. Information was collected using a standardized form.ResultsThere were 238 patients who were analyzed. The median age at the time of first AA prescription was 15.5 years. Female to male ratio was 52:48 and 54% of the subjects were more than 18 years of age. There were some differences in the presenting signs and symptoms observed in our study compared with similar studies from around the world. Urticaria and angioedema were the most common at about 70% across all ages, followed by shortness of breath at 28%. Some triggers were found to be more common in our region. Food was the commonest trigger for anaphylaxis including tree nuts, egg, and sesame. Drug allergy was also a common trigger, with penicillins and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the commonest. Regarding insect allergy, samsam ant was the commonest trigger in our study.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study on anaphylaxis in Saudi Arabia. Some of the manifestations of anaphylaxis are significantly different in our population study compared to previously published data from other parts of the world. While managing anaphylaxis, we should be mindful of these differences. This improved understanding should help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with anaphylaxis in our region.

The natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the Saudi population appears to be benign with catenoid morphology being the most common septal hypertrophy pattern. Risk of SCD appears to be quite low in this population.

Objective Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is one of the leading causes of late graft failure and subsequent death in orthotopic heart transplant. Although invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard modality for detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, dobutamine stress echocardiography has been recently frequently used as an alternative. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in transplant patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using a total of 150 dobutamine stress echocardiographic exams that were performed on 99 patients in our institution, with paired coronary angiogram and no acute rejection, within a median of 538 [interquartile range 371–816] days. Sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine echocardiography to detect allograft vasculopathy was evaluated. Allograft vasculopathy was defined as Grade 1 or higher based on ISHLT criteria. A positive dobutamine stress echo result was defined by new or worsening wall motion abnormality. Results Median age of the population at transplant was 34 [interquartile range 22–46] years; 76 (77%) patients were male. Allograft vasculopathy was present in 31 (20.6%) out of 150 coronary angiograms. Only 7 (4.6%) of that number were positive on dobutamine stress echocardiography. Sensitivity and specificity for allograft vasculopathy detection was 3% and 94%, respectively. Out of 7 false positive dobutamine stress echocardiograms, two were in patients with myocardial bridging. Two patients with mild acute rejection had both negative dobutamine stress echo. Conclusions Overall, positivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients after heart transplant is low. It has high specificity, but very low sensitivity for detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Dobutamine stress echocardiography should only be cautiously used as an alternative to coronary angiography.

No abstract