No abstract

Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

Background and Purpose— The treatment and prognosis of acute large vessel occlusion with mild symptoms have not been sufficiently studied. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical or radiological predictors of clinical outcome in patients with stroke with mild symptoms due to acute large vessel occlusion. Methods— Of 2420 patients with acute large vessel occlusion in the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2 (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism-Japan Registry 2), a multicenter prospective registry in Japan, patients with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 2 before onset and initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 0 to 5 were examined in post hoc analysis. We examined the clinical and radiological characteristics associated with a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2 at 90 days) using multivariate analysis, as well as the factors associated with a favorable outcome in patients treated with endovascular therapy. Results— We analyzed 272 patients (median age, 73 years; median NIHSS score on admission, 3). Eighty-six (31.6%) patients were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, 54 (19.9%) underwent endovascular therapy, and 208 (76.5%) showed a favorable outcome. In multivariate analysis, age <75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.42 [95% CI, 1.30–4.50]), initial NIHSS score 0 to 3 (OR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.59–5.98]), intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (OR, 2. 86 [95% CI, 1.32–6.21]), and blood glucose level ≤140 mg/dL (OR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.22–4.60]) were independently associated with a favorable outcome. However, endovascular therapy was not associated with a favorable outcome (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 0.71–3.88]). Among 54 patients treated with endovascular therapy, good reperfusion status was more common in the favorable outcome group (88.6% versus 60.0%; P <0.05). Conclusions— Younger age, lower initial NIHSS score, intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, and absence of hyperglycemia were independently associated with a favorable outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with low NIHSS scores. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

ImportanceEndovascular therapy (EVT) has been found to reduce functional disability in patients with acute stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. However, the extent of the ischemic region, measured using Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scores, may limit the efficacy of EVT.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of EVT according to ASPECTS 3 or less vs 4 to 5.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism—Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial (RESCUE-Japan LIMIT) was an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2018 to December 2021 at 45 stroke centers across Japan. The trial enrolled adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large ischemic region, defined as ASPECTS 3 to 5 primarily determined by magnetic resonance imaging, with occlusion site at the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery segment 1. Among 203 enrolled patients, 1 withdrew consent and 202 were included in the original trial and secondary analysis. This secondary analysis was conducted in April 2022.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to EVT with medical therapy or medical therapy alone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresModified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and symptomatic and any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours.ResultsAmong 202 patients, 106 (52%) had ASPECTS 3 or less (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [9.6] years; 54 female individuals [50.9%]) and 96 had ASPECTS 4 to 5 (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [10.6] years; 36 female individuals [37.5%]). Of patients with ASPECTS 3 or less, 12 (21.4%) in the EVT group and 9 (18.0%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.47-3.26). Of patients with ASPECTS 4 to 5, 19 patients (43.2%) in the EVT group and 4 (7.7%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 90 days (OR, 9.12; 95% CI, 2.80-29.70; interaction P = .01). The ordinal shift across the range of mRS scores toward a better outcome was not significant in those with ASPECTS or 3 or less (common OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.79-3.10) but was significant in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (common OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.07-9.71; interaction P = .046). The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly increased in patients with ASPECTS 3 or less when EVT was conducted (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.84-9.32) and nonsignificantly increased in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.89-4.73; interaction P = .24).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, EVT was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusive stroke and ASPECTS was 4 to 5 but not in those with ASPECTS 3 or less.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03702413