Many lung cancer patients have coexisting ILD, and these patients have a high risk of developing chemotherapy-induced ILD. In addition, patients with DILD who underwent EGFR-TKI therapy and 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens had a higher risk of fatal outcome.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit antitumour effects by activating the host immunity and cause immune-related adverse events (irAes). ici-related interstitial lung disease (ici-iLD) is a fatal irAE that is difficult to treat; moreover, its incidence is relatively higher in patients with lung cancer. therefore, early ici-iLD detection and intervention are important for patient safety. However, a risk assessment method for ici-iLD has not been established and the prediction of ici-iLD occurrence is difficult. The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors associated with ICI-ILD. To this end, we retrospectively analysed 102 patients with lung cancer who first received ICI and completed the treatment between April 2016 and December 2019 at Tokushima University Hospital. Nineteen patients had all grades of ICI-ILD and 10 had grade ≥ 3 ICI-ILD. The 30-day mortality rate of patients with grade ≥ 3 ICI-ILD was the highest among all patients (P < 0.01). The multivariate logistic analysis indicated that the performance status ≥ 2 alone and both performance status ≥ 2 and ≥ 50 pack-year were independent risk factors of ICI-ILD of grade ≥ 3 and all grades, respectively. Overall, our study provides insights to predict ici-iLD occurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that inhibit programmed death-1 (PD-1), PD ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), which are called immune checkpoint molecules. These molecules negatively regulate the host immunity; thus, the inhibition of these molecules activates the host immunity and exerts cross-organ antitumour effects 1. In the treatment of lung cancer, some clinical trials have revealed that the administration of ICI alone and in combination with cytotoxic anticancer agents resulted in better clinical outcomes than previous standard treatments; thus, the use of ICI significantly improved lung cancer treatment 2-4. However, the activation of the host immunity by ICI leads to characteristic adverse events, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which exhibit profiles different from those caused by cytotoxic anticancer agents 5,6. Therefore, the management of irAEs is essential for an effective ICI treatment. These irAEs affect various organs, such as the skin, endocrine glands, gastrointestinal tract, and liver, but only a few events are fatal because the majority of them can be controlled by adequate treatment 5,7. Specifically, ICI-related interstitial lung disease (ICI-ILD) has a low incidence (1-5%) and a high severity or mortality rate, according to clinical trials (50-60%) 8,9. Patients with lung cancer are known to have relatively higher ICI-ILD rates than those with other cancers 10. A prospective study of patients with lung cancer reported that the incidence of ICI-ILD was 14.5%, which is higher than that in clinical trials 11. ICI-ILD has also been reported to affect the prognosis of patients with lung cancer 11,12 .

Nifedipine is unstable under light and decomposes to a stable nitroso analog, nitrosonifedipine (NO-NIF). The ability of NO-NIF to block calcium channels is quite weak compared with that of nifedipine. Recently, we have demonstrated that NO-NIF reacts with unsaturated fatty acid leading to generate NO-NIF radical, which acquires radical scavenging activity. However, the effects of NO-NIF on the pathogenesis related with oxidative stress, such as atherosclerosis and hypertension, are unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of NO-NIF on angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced vascular remodeling. Ang II-induced thickening and fibrosis of aorta were inhibited by NO-NIF in mice. NO-NIF decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the aorta and urinary 8-hydroxy-20-deoxyguanosine. Ang II-stimulated mRNA expressions of p22(phox), CD68, F4/80, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and collagen I in the aorta were inhibited by NO-NIF. Moreover, NO-NIF inhibited Ang II-induced cell migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). NO-NIF reduced Ang II-induced ROS to the control level detected by dihydroethidium staining and lucigenin chemiluminescence assay in VSMCs. NO-NIF suppressed phosphorylations of Akt and epidermal growth factor receptor induced by Ang II. However, NO-NIF had no effects on intracellular Ca(2+) increase and protein kinase C-δ phosphorylation induced by Ang II in VSMCs. The electron paramagnetic resonance spectra indicated the continuous generation of NO-NIF radical of reaction with cultured VSMCs. These findings suggest that NO-NIF improves Ang II-induced vascular remodeling via the attenuation of oxidative stress.

BackgroundPeripheral neuropathy is a well-known side effect of vincristine (VCR), a microtubule inhibitor used for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like (namely R-CVP and R-THP-COP) regimens. Previous studies have shown that both the total dose of VCR and the number of treatment cycles are related to the incidence of VCR-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). However, VIPN will also occur during the first treatment cycle regardless of the total dose of VCR or number of treatment cycles (early-onset VIPN). There is little information about early-onset VIPN, and it is difficult to predict. The present study’s goal was to identify risk factors for early-onset VIPN.MethodsWe analyzed the case records of patients who had their first administration of an R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen between April 2008 and August 2013 at Tokushima University Hospital in Tokushima, Japan. To identify the risk factors for early-onset VIPN, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.ResultsForty-one patients underwent an R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen for the first time at Tokushima University Hospital between April 2008 and August 2013, and 14 patients had grade 1 or higher early-onset VIPN. A univariate analysis revealed that age, the dose of VCR and the concomitant use of aprepitant appeared to be the risk factors of early-onset VIPN. In our calculation using receiver-operator characteristics curves, the cut-off value for patient age was 65 years and that of the dose of VCR was 1.9 mg. A multivariate analysis revealed that VCR dose ≥ 1.9 mg and the concomitant use of the antiemetic aprepitant were independent risk factors for early-onset VIPN.ConclusionsOur present study showed that the patients who had VCR dose ≥ 1.9 mg and the concomitant use of aprepitant had the risk for early-onset VIPN. This suggests that it is important to use aprepitant in light of the risk of early-onset VIPN and the benefit of aprepitant’s antiemetic effect in R-CHOP and R-CHOP-like regimens.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the major cause of end-stage renal failure. Oxidative stress is implicated in the pathogenesis of DN. Nitrosonifedipine (NO-NIF) is a weak calcium channel blocker that is converted from nifedipine under light exposure. Recently, we reported that NO-NIF has potential as a novel antioxidant with radical scavenging abilities and has the capacity to treat vascular dysfunction by exerting an endothelial protective effect. In the present study, we extended these findings by evaluating the efficacy of NO-NIF against DN and by clarifying the mechanisms of its antioxidative effect. In a model of type 2 DN (established in KKAy mice), NO-NIF administration reduced albuminuria and proteinuria as well as glomerular expansion without affecting glucose metabolism or systolic blood pressure. NO-NIF also suppressed renal and systemic oxidative stress and decreased the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, a marker of endothelial cell injury, in the glomeruli of the KKAy mice. Similarly, NO-NIF reduced albuminuria, oxidative stress, and ICAM-1 expression in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) knockout mice. Moreover, NO-NIF suppressed urinary angiotensinogen (AGT) excretion and intrarenal AGT protein expression in proximal tubular cells in the KKAy mice. On the other hand, hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide production was not attenuated by NO-NIF in cultured endothelial cells. These findings suggest that NO-NIF prevents the progression of type 2 DN associated with endothelial dysfunction through selective antioxidative effects.

Background/Aims: Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is known to involve the progression of renal dysfunction through its cytotoxicity and proinflammatory effects such as the induction of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression in vascular endothelial cells (ECs). Olmesartan, one of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs), has been reported to show protective effects on injured ECs by some causal factors of renal disorder other than angiotensin II. However, the effects of olmesartan on TNF-α-induced glomerular EC damage have not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated the effects of RNH-6270, an active metabolite of olmesartan, on TNF-α-induced human glomerular EC (HGEC) damage to clarify the renoprotective mechanisms of ARBs. Methods: Cultured HGECs were stimulated by TNF-α, and then cell viability and cytotoxicity were measured by MTT assay and lactate dehydrogenase release assay, respectively. TNF-α-induced oxidative stress was estimated by dihydroethidium assay and lucigenin chemiluminescence assay. ICAM-1 expression and the phosphorylations of mitogen-activated protein kinases were measured using Western blotting assay. Results: RNH-6270 suppressed cell death and the increase in ICAM-1 expression induced by TNF-α via the inhibition of reactive oxygen species in HGECs. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that olmesartan might have protective effects against TNF-α-induced glomerular EC dysfunction.

Pemetrexed, a chemotherapeutic drug, is highly active in non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Unfortunately, rashes are more commonly associated with pemetrexed than other chemotherapies, and it is recommended that patients receive corticosteroids (8 mg/d of dexamethasone) for 3 d, including the day of pemetrexed administration (day 1). However, the efficacy of corticosteroids in this context has not been fully verified. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the medical records of 78 patients who received pemetrexed between April 2009 and March 2014, to confirm whether supplementary corticosteroids prevented rash development. The incidence of rash was lower in the 47 patients who received supplementary corticosteroids (after day 1) compared with the incidence among the 31 patients who did not receive supplementary corticosteroids (19.1% vs. 38.7%). The average cutoff dosage of supplementary corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 was 1.5 mg/d of dexamethasone, as calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the odds ratio was 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.94). Administration of ≥1.5 mg of corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 significantly reduced the severity of the rash compared to no supplementary treatment (grades 2/3, 13.3% vs. 33.3%, p<0.05). However, increasing the dose of corticosteroids had no additional effect on rash development. These results suggest that ≥1.5 mg of supplementary dexamethasone on day 2 and day 3 (in addition to day 1) may be necessary for preventing pemetrexed-induced rash, but high doses of dexamethasone (e.g., 8 mg/d) are unnecessary.Key words pemetrexed; rash; dexamethasone; corticosteroid; risk factor Pemetrexed (Alimta, Eli Lilly and Co.) is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. 1,2) These multiple targets may explain the broad and preferable antitumor activity of pemetrexed, which has been evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), head, neck, cervical, breast, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, and bladder cancers. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Pemetrexed is currently approved in combination with platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) as a first-line treatment, and as a single-agent second-line treatment, for MPM and NSCLC. 15,16) Moreover, cisplatin plus pemetrexed provides improved survival and reduced toxicity in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, compared to cisplatin plus gemcitabine. 17) Interestingly, multivariate analysis has revealed that increasing levels of homocysteine and methylmalonic acid are correlated with a toxic increase in pemetrexed. 18) The risks associated with severe pemetrexed toxicity, such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, and diarrhea, can be reduced by decreasing homocysteine and methylmalonic acid levels by supplementing patients with folic acid and vitamin B 12 . 18) Unfortunately, rash is one of the most common adverse events that ...

Background In patients treated with bevacizumab, hypertension may be a biomarker of therapeutic efficacy. However, it is not clear whether drugs that control blood pressure influence bevacizumab's efficacy. In this study, we investigated drugs that may affect hypertension in bevacizumab‐treated patients and examined the impact on the therapeutic effect. Patients and methods We analyzed 3,724,555 reports from the third quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2015. All data were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) analysis. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated a total of 58 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and treated for the first time with bevacizumab containing XELOX or mFOLFOX6 at The University of Tokushima Hospital between January 2010 and December 2015. The effect of the treatment was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Thereafter, the effect was confirmed using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and cultured cells. Results There are few reports in FAERS of hypertension in patients treated with omeprazole on bevacizumab. Based on the chart review, patients who used proton pump inhibitors (PPI) had a lower response to treatment than those who did not (response rate: 25% vs 50%). Furthermore, experiments on GEO and cell lines suggested that induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene expression by PPIs is the cause of the reduced therapeutic effect. Conclusion PPIs prevent hypertension in bevacizumab‐treated patients but may reduce bevacizumab's anti‐tumoral effects by inducing VEGF expression.