To date, there is no evidence that internal anti-rotation configurations are better than external ones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of eccentric cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening in internal and external hexagon implants with either of these two screw materials, titanium (Ti) alloy versus gold alloy. The reverse torque value of the abutment screw was measured before (initial preload) and after loading (post-loading). The prepared assemblies were divided into four groups (A to D). Groups A and B used internal hex implants with gold alloy and Ti alloy abutment screws respectively. Groups C and D used external hex implants with gold alloy and Ti alloy abutment screws respectively. In all the groups, post-loading preload was significantly (p<0.05) higher than initial preload. Further, two-way ANOVA indicated that the implant-abutment connection did not have an effect, but the abutment screw material did. In particular, Ti abutment screws were less likely to come loose.

is no evidence that internal anti-rotation configurations are better than external ones. As part of a study to clarify the features and advantages of internal anti-rotation configurations, the objective of the present investigation was to compare and evaluate the marginal fit and size of microgap at the implant-abutment interface for several external and internal anti-rotation configurations. To this end, three internal connection and two external hex connection implantabutment assemblies were examined in this study. The implant-abutment interface (I-A interface) was evaluated using three geometrical factors: vertical and horizontal discrepancies and size of microgap. Marginal fit and microgap size were measured by a scanning laser microscope. The I-A interface was also observed using a scanning electron microscope. Mean vertical discrepancy ranged from 22.6 to 62.2 μm, while horizontal discrepancy ranged from -27.1 to 16.0 μm. The microgap values of all I-A interfaces assessed in this study ranged from 2.3 to 5.6 μm. In conclusion, SEM images of I-A interface suggested no relationship between the geometrical factors and the type of anti-rotation configuration.

Abstract:The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the radiopacity of currently available dental luting materials. Five conventional cements, six resinmodified glass ionomers (RMGIs), two methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based acrylic resins (eight shades), and nine composite luting materials were evaluated. Radiographs of the specimens were taken together with tooth slices and aluminum step wedges. The density of the specimens was determined with a densitometer and was expressed in terms of the equivalent thickness of aluminum per 2.0-mm unit thickness of specimen. The radiopacity values for human enamel and dentin were 4.3 and 2.3 mm Al/2.0 mm specimen, respectively. The values for materials ranged from 5.1 to 12.9 for conventional luting materials, from 3.4 to 6.3 for RMGIs, from less than 0.5 to 7.3 for MMA resins, and from 2.3 to 9.9 for the composite luting materials. A zinc phosphate cement showed the highest value (12.9), whereas five shades of MMA resin resulted in the lowest value (less than 0.5). Two RMGIs and three composite luting materials exhibited radiopacity values between those of enamel (4.3) and dentin (2.3). It can be concluded that the radiopacity value of luting materials varies considerably, and that care must be taken when selecting luting materials, considering the material composition of restorations. (J Oral Sci 51, 223-230, 2009)

No abstract

No abstract