This study investigates how visitors evaluated a historical district that includes both authentic and manipulated elements. Using 13 bipolar scales, 323 visitors to the Kurashiki Bikan Historical Quarter were canvassed regarding their evaluations of the Quarter. The survey results suggest that perceptions of authenticity are a crucial factor affecting the overall evaluations of historical districts. Differences were observed, however, in the evaluative dimensions by which authenticity was assessed between visitors whose overall evaluations were favourable and those whose overall evaluations were unfavourable. It was also found that a sense of the maintenance of historical districts negatively affected the overall evaluations of visitors whose overall evaluations are unfavourable and that the duration of visitors' trips might be a significant determinant of overall favourability.
This study explores approaches and methods to investigate visitors' evaluation of historical districts. Personal interviews with use of repertory grid analysis and laddering analysis and slide experiments with photographs were conducted with a sample of students to reveal relationships between various evaluative components. The results of the two sets of methods are examined in a comparative manner to obtain abundant insights into evaluations of historical districts and the efficacy of these methods. The results provide insights into issues raised by past studies. Particularly, they shed light on the complex nature of visitors' evaluation of historical districts, as represented by the mixed effects of the presence of other people, commercialization, and modernity. Personal interviews and slide experiments are found to be mutually complementary in that, while the former illuminate the complex relationships between components of subjects' evaluations, the latter depict these relationships in a more holistic and simple form by uncovering the commonality between the elicited components. The findings of the slide experiments also suggest room for further attempts to elicit evaluative components. Further studies of this kind with different groups of subjects and in different field settings would provide further insights into this complex area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.