Background: To assess the impact of body composition imaging biomarkers in computed tomography (CT) on the perioperative morbidity and survival after surgery of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods: Eighty-five patients who underwent esophagectomy for locally advanced EC after neoadjuvant therapy between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were used to assess the body composition imaging biomarkers (visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) areas, psoas muscle area (PMA) and volume (PMV), total abdominal muscle area (TAMA)). Sarcopenia was defined as lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI) ≤38.5 cm2/m2 in women and ≤52.4 cm2/m2 in men. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 were considered obese. These imaging biomarkers were correlated with major complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative pneumonia, duration of postoperative hospitalization, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Preoperatively, sarcopenia was identified in 58 patients (68.2%), and sarcopenic obesity was present in 7 patients (8.2%). Sarcopenic patients were found to have an elevated risk for the occurrence of major complications (OR: 2.587, p = 0.048) and prolonged hospitalization (32 d vs. 19 d, p = 0.040). Patients with sarcopenic obesity had a significantly higher risk for postoperative pneumonia (OR: 6.364 p = 0.018) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (71 d vs. 24 d, p = 0.021). Neither sarcopenia nor sarcopenic obesity was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (p > 0.05). Low preoperative muscle biomarkers (PMA and PMV) and their decrease (ΔPMV and ΔTAMA) during the follow-up period significantly correlated with shorter DFS and OS (p = 0.005 to 0.048). Conclusion: CT body composition imaging biomarkers can identify high-risk patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing surgery. Sarcopenic patients have a higher risk of major complications, and patients with sarcopenic obesity are more prone to postoperative pneumonia. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are both subsequently associated with a prolonged hospitalization. Low preoperative muscle mass and its decrease during the postoperative follow-up are associated with lower DFS and OS.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundGadoxetic acid‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in detecting liver metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the long examination time limits its utility in the initial workup of patients with PDAC.PurposeTo evaluate the incremental value of an abbreviated gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI for the detection of liver metastases in patients with PDAC.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationPatients (N = 130) with potentially resectable PDAC (women, 58 [44.6%]).Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T and 3 T; gradient dual‐echo T1‐weighted (in‐phase and opposed‐phase), fat‐suppressed fast spin‐echo T2‐weighted, single‐shot echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted, and three‐dimensional fat‐suppressed T1‐weighted gradient‐echo dynamic contrast‐enhanced and hepatobiliary phase sequences, as well as contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CECT).AssessmentThree radiologists independently reviewed three different image sets to detect liver metastases: set 1, CECT alone; set 2, CECT and abbreviated MRI comprising fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted, diffusion‐weighted, and hepatobiliary phase images; and set 3, CECT and standard gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI.Statistical TestsFigure of merit (FOM) was compared using the jackknife alternative free‐response receiver operating characteristics, and other per‐lesion and per‐patient diagnostic parameters for each image set were compared using McNemar's and Fisher's test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 43 liver metastases were identified in 13 patients. Reader‐averaged FOM to detect liver metastases were significantly higher for sets 2 (0.884) and 3 (0.886) than for set 1 (0.609), while they were comparable between sets 2 and 3 (P = 0.96). The mean per‐patient sensitivities, negative predictive values, and accuracies were significantly higher for sets 2 and 3 than for set 1, while those between sets 2 and 3 were not significantly different (not applicable, P > 0.99, and P > 0.99, respectively).Data ConclusionGadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI combined with CECT had higher diagnostic performance than CECT alone for the detection of liver metastases in patients with PDAC. The incremental values were comparable for the abbreviated MRI and standard MRI.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 2

The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comparing the different approaches used in Germany and Japan. Methods: This binational IRB-approved retrospective dual-center study included a total of 94 HCC patients subdivided in a German and a Japanese cohort. For each patient, liver and tumor volumetry was performed using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, a comprehensive risk profile, including body constitution and liver and kidney function was established. Primary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS). Results: PFS in the German cohort was 168 vs 224d in the Japanese cohort (p=0.640). When subdivided by BCLC stage, no significant differences were reported (p=0.160-0.429). OS was significantly longer in the Japanese cohort with 856 vs. 303d (p<0.001). OS for BCLC A was significantly longer in the Japanese cohort (1960 vs. 428d; p<0.001), while survival rates did not differ significantly in BCLC B (785 vs 330d; p=0.067) and C-stages (208 vs 302d; p=0.186). Older age (p=0.034), poorer liver/kidney function (p=0.025-0-035), and a higher liver/tumor ratio (p<0.001) were found to correlate with shorter survival. ECOG scores were significantly higher in the German cohort (p=0.002). Conclusion:While OS is longer in TACE-treated patients in the Japanese cohort compared to the German cohort, the two approaches seem to be equally effective as PFS does not differ significantly. The different survival rates may be caused by the different clinical performance status of the selected collectives. In very early and early stage HCC, TACE in Japan seems to be an effective treatment option while in Germany for patients in those stages TACE remains a second-line option for patients not available for surgery or ablation.