Background
Seprafilm did not decrease small bowel obstruction (SBO), but significantly decreased reoperation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the preventive effect in colon cancer remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients with colon cancer. The study group comprised 345 patients with colon cancer. In the seprafilm group (n = 166), two sheets of seprafilm were inserted under a midline incision. Patients who were admitted and required decompression were considered to have SBO.
Results
The median follow‐up was 61.9 months. Patient characteristics were well balanced. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SBO between the seprafilm group (7.8%) and the control group (10.6%) (P = .46). In patients who underwent reoperation, SBO occurred in a midline incision in one patient and at other sites in four patients in the seprafilm group as compared with two patients and five patients, respectively, in the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that only a history of laparotomy was an independent risk factor for SBO.
Conclusions
Seprafilm did not decrease SBO or reoperation in colon cancer. The incidence of SBO caused by adhesion to the midline incision was relatively low as compared with that caused by adhesion to other sites.
Background: To prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in colorectal surgery, the combination of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP), and the intravenous antibiotics have been proposed as standard treatment. We conducted an RCT comparing the incidence of SSI between MBP + OABP and OABP alone after receiving a single dose of intravenous antibiotics. Methods: The study group comprised 254 patients who underwent elective surgery for colon cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive MBP + OABP and intravenous antibiotics (MBP + OABP group) or to receive OABP and intravenous antibiotics (OABP alone group). Results: Overall, 125 patients in MBP + OABP group and 126 patients in OABP alone group were eligible. Incisional SSI occurred in 3 patients (2.4%) in MBP + OABP group, and 8 patients (6.3%) in the OABP-alone group. Organ/space SSI developed in 0 patients (0%) and in 4 patients (3.2%) in each group respectively. The OABP-alone group was thus not shown to be noninferior to the MBP + OABP group in the incidences of incisional SSI or organ/ space SSI. Other infectious complications developed in 7 pa-tients (5.6%) and in 6 patients (4.8%) in each group, indicating the non-inferiority of OABP alone to MBP + OABP. Conclusions: MBP combined with oral antibiotics and intravenous antibiotics remains standard in elective colon cancer surgery.
BackgroundMucinous rectal carcinoma has been reported to have a lower survival rate and a poorer histologic response to chemoradiotherapy(CRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately evaluate the amount of mucin pools (MP) in primary cancer tissue. We compared the degree of MP on MRI before and after CRT with the histologic findings of resected specimens to investigate the predictors of response to CRT.MethodsThe study group comprised 205 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who received preoperative CRT. MPs were measured on MRI before and after CRT and in resected specimens. The degree of MP was classified into five classes according to the MP area ratio: 0%, class I; 1 to 19%, class II; 20 to 49%, class III; and 50% or higher, class IV.ResultsThe degree of MP on MRI was largely unchanged after CRT; however, the MP on MRI after CRT was underestimated in 26.3% of patients as compared with that in resected specimens. A pathological complete response was obtained in patients who initially had no MP or had an MP ratio of less than 20%. The tumor volume was significantly greater, and the rates of tumor shrinkage and T downstaging were significantly lower in patients who had an MP area ratio of 20% or higher before CRT than in those who had an MP area ratio of less than 20%.ConclusionsThe MP area ratio measured on MRI before treatment was closely associated with the response to CRT and is a potentially useful predictor of treatment response.
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare disease, and mixed cases with colorectal adenocarcinoma also exist. The histogenesis of this disease remains unclear. We studied the numbers of neuroendocrine marker-positive cells in adenocarcinoma tissue and in normal mucosal tissue to investigate the relation between adenocarcinoma and NEC and to discuss the histogenesis of NEC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We studied a total of 354 curatively resected cases of stage II or III colon cancer and 36 cases of rectal cancer treated at the Tokai University Hospital between 2007 and 2012. Adenocarcinoma tissue and normal mucosal tissue were immunohistochemically stained with chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56. Cases in which neuroendocrine marker-positive cells were found in cancer tissue were defined as positive. In normal mucosa, the numbers of positive cells per 15 high-power fields (HPF) were counted. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 390 cases, 181 cases had right sided colon cancer, 173 cases had left sided colon cancer, and 36 cases had rectal cancer. The rates of positive staining for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56 were significantly higher in the right sided colon than in the left sided colon, consistent with the preferred sites of NEC as reported previously. Cells positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin in normal mucosa were significantly more common in the rectum and the left sided colon than in the right sided colon. No site-specific differences were found for CD56. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Neuroendocrine marker-positive cells in colorectal cancer tissue are more common in the right sided colon, whereas neuroendocrine marker-positive cells in normal mucosa are more common in the rectum. These results suggest that NEC may arise from preceding adenocarcinomas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.