Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients associated with pregnancy and lactation were clarified by means of a case‐control study of matched non‐pregnant and non‐lactating patients with breast cancer. From 18 institutions in Japan, a total of 192 subjects with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (72 cases) and lactation (120 cases) were collected between 1970 and 1988, accounting for 0.76% of all breast cancer patients. The duration of symptoms was longer and tumor size was larger in the study subjects. Although the disease‐free interval was longer than that in the control patients, the survival time was shorter. There was no characteristic difference in histologic type. Vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis were found more frequently in the subjects. The positive rates of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor were lower in the subjects. The 5‐ and 10‐year survival rates of the study patients were 65% and 55%, respectively, and these survivals were significantly lower than those of the control (P < 0.001). The survival rates were poorer in the subjects, in accordance with stage and lymph node metastasis. The results suggest that most of the patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and lactation are in a more advanced stage because of a delay in detection and diagnosis, and hence have unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, it is important to diagnose and treat early for improvement of prognosis in patients with breast cancer during pregnancy and lactation.
High-grade invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) of the breast with large, central acellular zones on their cut surfaces are usually associated with the myoepithelial immunophenotype of carcinoma cells, which includes the expression of S-100 protein, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and keratin 14. To clarify the clinical significance of these features of IDCs, the authors compared the incidence of the myoepithelial immunophenotype immunohistochemically, patient prognosis, and metastatic sites of the tumor between 20 high-grade IDCs with large, central acellular zones and 40 control high-grade IDCs without these zones. The myoepithelial immunophenotype was detected in 16 IDCs (80%) with large, central acellular zones but in only seven IDCs (18%) without. The risk ratio of metastasis, especially in the brain and lung, and death from cancer were significantly higher (p = 0.0096 and p = 0.030) for the 20 IDCs with large, central acellular zones than for those without by Cox's univariate analysis. Using Cox's multivariate analysis, large, central acellular zones in IDCs were an indicator of high risk of brain and lung metastases and of death by cancer independent of nodal status and tumor size. Examination of large, central acellular zones and myoepithelial immunophenotype in high-grade IDCs appears helpful in predicting patient prognosis and preferential metastatic sites of the tumors.
Aberrant CpG methylations play important roles in cancer development and progression. In this study, aberrant methylations in human breast cancer were searched for using methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis (MS-RDA). A CpG island (CGI) in the 5 0 region of the heparan sulfate d-glucosaminyl 3-Osulfotransferase-2 (3-OST-2) gene was found to be hypermethylated, while its exon 2 was hypomethylated. In seven breast cancer cell lines, hypermethylation of the 5 0 region and loss of 3-OST-2 expression were observed. Treatment with a demethylating agent, 5-aza-2 0 -deoxycytidine, removed the methylation of the CGI in the 5 0 region and restored its expression, demonstrating silencing of the 3-OST-2 gene. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis in 85 primary breast cancers showed that the hypermethylation of the CGI in the 5 0 region was present in 75 (88%) of them. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis in 37 primary breast cancers showed that the average expression level was decreased in them. Further, MSP analysis in primary colon, lung and pancreatic cancers showed that hypermethylation of the CGI in the 5 0 region was present in the colon (8/10, 80%), lung (7/10, 70%) and pancreatic (10/10, 100%) cancers. These results showed that silencing of 3-OST-2 was present in a wide range of human cancers. The 3-OST-2 gene encodes an enzyme involved in the final modification step of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and its silencing is expected to result in abnormal modification of HSPGs and abnormal signal transduction. From the high incidence, silencing of the 3-OST-2 gene is expected to have high diagnostic, and potentially therapeutic, values.
Aberrant methylation of CpG islands (CGI) not only plays a role in gene silencing, but is also a potential cancer biomarker. To identify more CGI aberrantly methylated in human breast cancers, we carried out a genome-wide search for aberrant methylation, using methylation-sensitive-representational difference analysis. CGI in 5 0 upstream regions of 20 genes, TSPAN-2, AK5, LOC284999, HOXD11, FLJ25161, XT3, PCDH10, PCDHGB6, SIM1, LOC346978, COE2, TDH (FLJ25033), LOC346419, FLJ33790, GJB2, AMN, LOC201164, DLX4, DCC and FOXA2, were found to be methylated in at least one of 8 breast cancer cell lines. Fifteen of the 20 genes were methylated in more than one of 21 primary breast cancers in Stages I or II, and especially, those of LOC346978, HOXD11, SIM1, PCDHGB6 and FLJ25161 were methylated in more than 10 cancers. All the breast cancers had some aberrant methylation. Key words: MS-RDA; breast cancer; CpG island; methylation Aberrant methylation of CpG islands (CGI) in promoter regions is known to be involved in silencing of tumor-suppressor genes. 1,2Because the aberrant methylation of tumor-suppressor genes is specific to cancer cells, its detection in biopsy specimens and free DNA in the blood is drawing attention as a tumor marker.3 Aberrantly methylated DNA molecules embedded in the vast majority of normal, unmethylated DNA molecules can be sensitively detected by various techniques, such as methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and quantitative MSP.4,5 Detection of aberrant methylation is more advantageous than detection of mutation in terms of sensitivity. One of the current limitations to the use of aberrant methylation as a tumor marker is the lack of target CGI specifically methylated in cancer cells.Uncovering novel aberrantly methylated CGI is important not only for discovery of novel tumor-suppressor genes, but also for identification of tumor markers. To make a genome-wide screening for novel aberrant methylation, restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS), methylation-sensitive-representational difference analysis (MS-RDA) and cDNA microarrays combined with treatment with a demethylating agent have been used.6-8 Most studies, including our previous analysis of human breast cancers, 9,10 have attempted to identify genes silenced in cancers. These studies have paid little attention to the other CGI that are potentially useful as tumor biomarkers even if not related with gene silencing.In our study, to search for aberrantly methylated 5 0 CGI as candidate tumor markers, we analyzed a human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-468, by MS-RDA with recent modifications for efficient isolation of CGI. 11,12Material and methods Cell lines, tumor samples, and DNA/RNA extraction MCF-7, ZR-75-1, BT474, T-47D, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and SK-BR-3 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD), and YMB-1-E was obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (Tokyo, Japan). Human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) were purchased from Cambrex (East Rutherford, NJ). Breast cancers (1 carcinom...
No abstract
The prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer was examined by a multi-institutional study, aiming at the clinical application of total sequencing analysis and validation of assay sensitivity in Japanese people using a cross-sectional approach based on genetic factors estimated from personal and family histories. One hundred and thirty-five subjects were referred to the genetic counseling clinics and enrolled in the study. Full sequencing analysis of the BRCA1/2 gene showed 28 types of deleterious mutations in 36 subjects (26.7%), including 13 types of BRCA1 mutations in 17 subjects (12.6%) and 15 types of BRCA2 mutations in 19 subjects (14.1%). Subjects were classified into five groups and 22 subgroups according to their personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and the prevalence of deleterious mutations was compared with previously reported data in non-Ashkenazi individuals. Statistical analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel test for groups I through IV revealed that the prevalence of Japanese subjects was significantly higher than that of non-Ashkenazi individuals (P = 0.005, odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.88). Family history of the probands suffering from breast cancer indicated risk factors for the presence of deleterious mutations of BRCA1/2 as follows: (1) I n Japan, breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women and estimates of new cases and deaths in 2002 were 32 245 and 9178, respectively.(1) The standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer in Japan was approximately one-third that of the US (32.7 vs 101.7 per 100 000 women).(1) The incidence of breast cancer in Japanese women shows a steady increase; however, it is still much lower than in Western countries. In breast cancer, family history is the strongest risk factor for cancer predisposition. Epidemiological studies showed that 12% of women with breast cancer have one affected family member and 1% have two or more affected relatives.(2) Women with one, two, and three or more first-degree affected relatives have an increased breast cancer risk when compared with women who do not have an affected relative (risk ratios 1.8, 2.9, and 3.9, respectively).(2) Recent advances in molecular genetics elucidated BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) as two major susceptibility genes for breast cancer predisposition.(3,4) Gene testing of BRCA1/2 is available as a routine clinical test for diagnosing hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) in the US and other Western countries, (5,6) while only a few reports have been published concerning the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations among Japanese people. (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) The methods of genetic analysis employed in these studies varied, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/ single strand conformational polymorphisms (SSCP), protein truncation test, and PCR/direct sequencing, but they were performed as preliminary in-house tests in the research setting. In the US, commercial BRCA1/2 gene testing was initiated by M...
p53 protein has been frequently detected at high levels in the nuclei of human breast cancer cells. We analyzed inununohistochemically the association between nuclear localization of p53 protein and clinical and histological parameters of breast cancer patients. Surgically resected tissues of 73 primary breast cancers were processed by acetone fixation and paraffin embedding and examined using an anti‐p53 monoclonal antibody, Pabl801. p53 immunoreactivity was detected in the nuclei of cancer cells in 17 cases (23%). The nuclear p53 immunoreaction was closely associated with overexpression of c‐erbB‐2 protein (P<0.05), high histologic grade (P<0.01), advanced clinical stage (P<0.05), and negative estrogen receptor status (P< 0.01). When 31 cases which had been followed up for more than 50 months were examined, a positive nuclear p53 immunoreaction was found to he significantly associated with shorter overall survival of patients (P<0.01). These results suggest that inununohistochemical examination of nuclear p53 protein is clinically useful as an indicator of breast cancer aggressiveness.
There was a positive correlation between CEA levels and CA 15-3 levels and patient prognosis. Thus, the levels of these tumor markers may help to determine prognosis in breast cancer patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.