Background Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become widely used for mediastinal procedures since 2018 when it was included in insurance coverage in Japan. Few studies have compared the surgical outcomes of RATS with the more established video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach to mediastinal surgery. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of VATS and RATS to examine the advantages of the RATS approach in a single institutional cohort. Methods A total of 144 patients who underwent VATS and 46 who underwent RATS mediastinal surgery between 2014 and 2022 were enrolled. We compared clinicopathological features such as age, sex, smoking history, respiratory function, surgical field, laterality, surgical procedure, board certification of the surgeon, and histology between the two groups. Perioperative outcomes including operation time, volume of blood lost, number of conversion cases to open surgery, duration of chest drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were also reviewed. Results The comparison of patient characteristics between the groups showed significant differences in median age (VATS, 52.5 years; RATS, 67.0 years; P=0.001), combined resection of surrounding tissues of the tumor (VATS, 2.1%; RATS, 10.9%; P=0.02), board certification of the surgeon (VATS, 53.5%; RATS, 100.0%; P<0.001), and histology (RATS group had a higher percentage of thymic epithelial tumors, P=0.01). Regarding perioperative outcomes, the median operation time was 120 min in the VATS group and 88 min in the RATS group, showing a significant difference (P=0.03). There were no significant differences in the volume of blood lost, incidence of conversion to open chest surgery, duration of chest drainage, postoperative length of stay in hospital, and incidence of perioperative complications. In the perioperative outcomes of cases operated on by board-certified surgeons, the median operation time (VATS, 117 min; RATS, 88 min; P=0.02) and median postoperative length of stay in hospital (VATS, 7 days; RATS, 6 days; P=0.001) showed significant differences, while other postoperative outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions RATS for mediastinal surgery is as safe as the VATS approach and may result in a shorter operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Further analysis of RATS for mediastinal surgery in a larger cohort is warranted.
Background Thoracic endometriosis-related pneumothorax is a secondary spontaneous pneumothorax caused by thoracic endometriosis. Diaphragmatic endometriosis is well-studied, but visceral and/or parietal pleural lesions are not. Although surgery is an effective treatment, postoperative recurrence rates are unsatisfactory probably due to inadequate understanding of underlying pathophysiology. We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features of thoracic endometriosis. Methods In total, 160 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery from a single institution with histopathologically proven thoracic endometriosis from January 2015 to December 2019 were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were assessed retrospectively. Results The cohort median age was 41 (range 22–53) years. Pneumothorax was right-sided in 159 (99.4%) and left-sided in only 1 (0.6%) case. Visceral and parietal pleural lesions were diagnosed in 79 (49.4%) and 71 (44.4%) patients, respectively. In total, 104 visceral pleural lesions and 101 parietal pleural lesions were detected. The S4 region and the dorsal 6th intercostal space contained the largest number of visceral pleural (66 lesions) and parietal pleural lesions (25 lesions), respectively. Histopathological evaluation revealed endometriotic tissues, existing in the outer external elastic layer in all lesions, were localized or invaded deeply. The median follow-up period was 370 (range, 6–1824) days. The Kaplan-Meier method revealed that the 1- and 2-year postoperative recurrence rates were 13.8% and 19.3%, respectively. Conclusions Visceral pleural endometriotic lesions may be disseminated from the visceral pleural surface and infiltrate into the pleura. Intraoperatively, careful observation of the specific sites, such as the visceral pleura of S4 and the parietal pleura of 6th intercostal space, is important to reduce postoperative recurrence.
Background: A pulmonary arteriovenous malformation is an abnormal dilated blood vessel that makes direct communication between a pulmonary artery and pulmonary vein and can be associated with hypoxemia or neurological complications, including brain abscess and cerebral infarction. Treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation includes surgical resection and transcatheter embolotherapy, however the adaptation of therapies should be considered when a patient is in bad condition.Case presentation: A 51-year-old man was admitted after developing fever, consciousness disorder, and hypoxemia. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a brain abscess. Bilateral pulmonary arteriovenous malformations were found by contrast computed tomography. Because of a family history of PAVM, a history of epistaxis, and the existence of oral mucosa telangiectasia, he was diagnosed with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and brain abscess caused by right-to-left shunt. The brain abscess improved with antibiotic treatment; however, the administration of oxygen did not ameliorate his hypoxemia. His hypoxemia was exacerbated by positive pressure ventilation. Considering his systemic and respiratory condition, we considered surgery to involve a high degree of risk. After controlling his brain abscess and pneumonia, transcatheter embolotherapy was performed. This improved his systemic condition, enabling surgical treatment.Conclusions: This middle-aged patient suffering from brain abscess and severe hypoxemia with multiple pulmonary arteriovenous malformations was successfully treated by a combination of transcatheter embolotherapy and surgery. The adaptation and combination of therapies, as well as the sequence of treatments, should be considered depending on the patient status and lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.