Background and aim The serological risk prediction system combines the pepsinogen test and anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibody determination. In this system, chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is diagnosed using the pepsinogen test. Patients who are H. pylori negative and pepsinogen negative are classified into group A, are assumed to be H. pylori uninfected, and are at an extremely low risk for gastric cancer. However, gastric cancers are detected in this group. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinicopathological status of group A patients with gastric cancer. Methods A total of 109 gastric cancer patients classified as group A were enrolled in a multicenter study. Group A patients were divided into two subgroups: group AN (H. pylori uninfected) and group AP (H. pylori infected). They were compared to 183 H. pylori-infected gastric cancer patients who were not in group A. 123Gastric Cancer (2017( ) 20:764-771 DOI 10.1007 Results Of the 109 patients, only 7 were classified as group AN; the other 102 were classified as group AP. The clinicopathological features of group AP included older age, predominantly differentiated type cancer, endoscopically visualized CAG, and pepsinogen (PG) I/II ratio lower than that of group AN. In group AN, the depressed type was dominant, and the PG I/II ratio was higher than in those gastric cancer patients who were infected with H. pylori. Conclusion Patients in group AP had CAG, and their gastric cancers were similar to those of H. pylori-eradicated patients. Concerning the recent ABC classification system, advanced decision criteria should be proposed to decrease the false-negative evaluation of gastric cancer risk.

Aim. Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric epithelial neoplasms is a major complication. We investigated factors related to post-ESD bleeding to identify preventive measures. Methods. The study included 161 gastric epithelial neoplasms in 142 patients from June 2007 to September 2010. Post-ESD bleeding was defined as an ulcer with active bleeding or apparent exposed vessels diagnosed by an emergency endoscopy or a planned follow-up endoscopy. We analyzed associations between bleeding and the following factors: age, sex, morphology, pathology, tumor depth, ulcer presence/absence, location, size of the resected lesion, duration of the procedure, the number of times bleeding occurred during ESD, and the use of anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet drugs. Subsequently, we examined characteristics of bleeding cases. Results. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 21 lesions. Univariate analysis of these cases showed that ulcer presence/absence (P < 0.001), middle or lower third lesions (P = 0.036), circumference (P = 0.014), and a post-ESD ulcer with an extended lesser curve (P = 0.009) were significant predictors of bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that ulcer presence/absence (OR 9.73, 95% CI 2.28–41.53) was the only significant predictor. Conclusion. Ulcer presence/absence was considered the most significant predictor of post-ESD bleeding.

MWEL and CLM are characteristic endoscopic features in PPI users. A gender-associated difference was noted in terms of the frequency of these lesions.

Background/Aims: Dual red imaging (DRI) is a new, image-enhanced endoscopy technique. There are few reports about the usefulness of DRI during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to examine the usefulness of DRI in endoscopic hemostasis during gastric ESD. Methods:We enrolled a total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD. Five endoscopists compared DRI with white light imaging (WLI) for the visibility of blood vessels and bleeding points while performing endoscopic hemostasis. Results: The visibility of blood vessels was increased in 56% (19/34) of the cases, and the visibility of bleeding points was improved in 55% (11/20) of the cases with the use of DRI compared with the use of WLI. Conclusions: DRI improved the visibility of blood vessels and bleeding points in cases with oozing bleeding, blood pooling around the bleeding points, and multiple bleeding points. Clin Endosc 2020;53:54-59

The presence of H. pylori-induced gastritis can be evaluated using serum PG levels.