An ablation zone with an ablative margin of 5 mm or greater was the most important factor for local control of hepatocellular carcinoma.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Low skeletal muscle mass is significantly associated with severe adverse events (AEs) from chemotherapy, and low tolerability leads to decreased survival. We aimed to investigate whether body skeletal muscle mass is correlated with tolerability and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at five locations in Japan. We included 100 patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib. Skeletal muscle mass was measured by computed tomography and normalized for height in m² as skeletal muscle index (SMI). The assessment criteria for low SMI were taken from the sarcopenia criteria of the Japan Society of Hepatology. We investigated the influence of low SMI on drug withdrawal due to severe AEs in the first 2 months and on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The numbers of high- and low-SMI patients were 41 and 59, respectively. Those with severe AEs leading to withdraw in the high- and low-SMI groups were 7 and 23, respectively. The low-SMI group had a higher withdrawal rate than the high-SMI group (<i>p</i> = 0.042). The median TTF in the low- and high-SMI groups was 139 and 230 days, respectively. The median OS in the low- and high-SMI groups was 264 and 353 days, respectively. Patients in the low-SMI group experienced significantly worse OS and TTF than those in the high-SMI group (log-rank test for trend: TTF, <i>p</i> = 0.010; OS, <i>p</i> = 0.021). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Decreased skeletal muscle mass is associated with the occurrence of severe AEs and worse TTF and OS. Skeletal muscle mass can be used as a predictive marker for tolerability and prognosis to lenvatinib in patients with HCC.

BackgroundThis study investigated the survival benefits of sorafenib vs. radiotherapy (RT) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in the main trunk or the first branch.MethodsNinety-seven patients were retrospectively reviewed. Forty patients were enrolled by the Kanagawa Liver Study Group and received sorafenib, and 57 consecutive patients received RT in our hospital. Overall survival was compared between the two groups with PVTT by propensity score (PS) analysis. Factors associated with survival were evaluated by multivariate analysis.ResultsThe median treatment period with sorafenib was 45 days, while the median total radiation dose was 50 Gy. The Child-Pugh class and the level of invasion into hepatic large vessels were significantly more advanced in the RT group than in the sorafenib group. Median survival did not differ significantly between the sorafenib group (4.3 months) and the RT group (5.9 months; P = 0.115). After PS matching (n = 28 per group), better survival was noted in the RT group than in the sorafenib group (median survival, 10.9 vs. 4.8 months; P = 0.025). A Cox model showed that des-γ-carboxy prothrombin <1000 mAU/mL at enrollment and RT were significant independent predictors of survival in the PS model (P = 0.024, HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.282 to 0.915; and P = 0.007, HR, 0.434; 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.779; respectively).ConclusionsRT is a better first-line therapy than sorafenib in patients who have advanced unresectable HCC with PVTT.

Background The efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-center randomized phase II study comparing a sequential HAIC-sorafenib regimen versus sorafenib alone as an initial therapy for HCC. Methods Patients were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive sequential HAIC with cisplatin followed by sorafenib (HAIC group, n = 35) or sorafenib alone (sorafenib group, n = 33) as an initial therapy. The primary endpoint was the one-year survival rate. Secondary endpoint included overall survival (OS), the 2-year survival rate, the time-to-progression (TTP), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results For the primary endpoint, the one-year survival rates were 46% in the HAIC group and 58% in the sorafenib group. The median OS period was 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.0–18.8) in the HAIC group and 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.2–19.7) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.86, P = 0.78). The median TTP, ORR and DCR in the HAIC group were 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.7–5.5), 14.3, and 45.7%, respectively, while those in the sorafenib group were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.3–6.8), 9.1, and 45.5%, respectively. No unexpected adverse events related to HAIC or sorafenib were observed in either group. Conclusions Sequential HAIC with cisplatin and sorafenib does not improve the survival benefit, compared with sorafenib alone, when used as an initial therapy for advanced HCC. However, this study was underpowered in regard to its primary and secondary endpoints, so the results should be interpreted with caution. Trial registration UMIN ID 000006147, registration data: August 11, 2011.