Purpose: En bloc resection for bladder tumors has been developed to overcome shortcomings of conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors with regard to safety, pathological evaluation and oncologic outcomes. However, the potential benefits and utility compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors have not been conclusively demonstrated. We aimed to update the current evidence with focus on the pathological benefits of en bloc resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: The PubMedÒ, Web of ScienceÔ and ScopusÒ databases were searched in August 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared safety, and pathological and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent en bloc resection with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors.

Purpose: T1 bladder cancer is characterized by high recurrence and aggressive progression. Muscularis mucosae invasion may be a prognostic factor for progression, but the limitations of conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors make diagnosis difficult. We correlated degree of invasion with oncologic outcome and evaluated the utility of pathological diagnosis following en bloc resection of bladder tumors. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 123 consecutive patients diagnosed with pT1 bladder cancer between November 2013 and December 2018. Transurethral resection was conducted in 91 patients, and en bloc resection in 32 patients. All specimens were analyzed for invasion depth and pT1 substaging (T1a/b: invasion above or into/beyond muscularis mucosae, pT1m/e: microinvasive or extensively invasive). Primary end points were prognostic values of pT1 substaging and invasion depth. The secondary end point was the pathological diagnostic utility of en bloc resection. Results: Median followup was 23 months. Three-year progression-free survival rate differed significantly depending on muscularis mucosae invasion (pT1a: 97.3%, pT1b: 72.8%; p[0.003) and invasion depth from basal membrane (<2 mm: 90.6%, !2 mm: 77.9%; p[0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that sessile tumor and invasion depth from basal membrane !2 mm were independent prognostic factors for progression. Diagnostic rates for pT1a/b and invasion depth were 77.6% and 85.9%, respectively, with transurethral resection, but 100% and 100% with en bloc resection (p[0.01 and p[0.03). Conclusions: Vertical lamina propria invasion is predictive of progression in T1 bladder cancer, underlining the importance of accurately diagnosing the degree of vertical lamina propria invasion with en bloc resection.

Pembrolizumab is the standard for the first and second lines in treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the value of pretreatment clinical characteristics and hematologic biomarkers for prognosticating response to pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic UC. PUBMED®, Web of Science™, and Scopus® databases were searched for articles published before May 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab and pretreatment clinical characteristics or laboratory examination. Overall, 13 studies comprising 1311 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several pretreatment patients’ demographics and hematologic biomarkers were significantly associated with worse OS as follows: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (Pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57–4.09), presence of visceral metastasis (Pooled HR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.42–2.38), presence of liver metastasis (Pooled HR: 4.23, 95% CI 2.18–8.20), higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (Pooled HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.07–1.55) and, higher c-reactive protein (CRP) (Pooled HR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.52–4.07). Metastatic UC patients with poor PS, liver metastasis, higher pretreatment NLR and/or CRP have a worse survival despite pembrolizumab treatment. These findings might help to guide the prognostic tools for clinical decision-making; however, they should be interpreted carefully, owing to limitations regarding the retrospective nature of primary data.

Purpose:The primary advantage of en bloc resection of bladder tumors is to provide better diagnostic accuracy. However, the clinical significance of horizontal and vertical margin has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the clinical importance of surgical margins in patients who underwent en bloc resection of bladder tumors.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the records of 140 consecutive patients who underwent en bloc resection of bladder tumors for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. We analyzed perioperative and oncological outcome, and compared patient demographics and recurrence-free survival for horizontal findings. The relationship between surgical margin and second transurethral resection outcome in pT1 bladder cancer was also analyzed.Results:Mean tumor diameter was 17.2±9.8 mm. Pathological stages were 93 cases in pTa and 47 cases in pT1. Diagnostic rates for the horizontal and vertical margins were 63% and 99%, respectively. The rates of sessile, carcinoma in situ, high grade, and pT1 tumors were significantly higher in the horizontal margin positive group (41) than in the negative group (47). There was no significant difference in 2-year recurrence-free survival based on horizontal margin findings (negative: 72.4%, positive: 75.4%, p=0.87). A second transurethral resection was performed in 31 of the 47 pT1 patients; pT1 residue was seen only in vertical margin positive cases, and 5 pTa/pTis residues at the transurethral resection scar were seen in 15 horizontal margin positive patients.Conclusions:Horizontal margin positive findings were not associated with recurrence-free survival, but careful assessment is warranted regarding residue at the original site. A second transurethral resection should be considered in patients with horizontal and vertical margin positive pT1 bladder cancer.

Aims En‐bloc transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder tumour (ERBT) is designed to provide more accurate pathological diagnosis of specimens than conventional TUR of bladder tumour (cTURBT). Some studies have reported that T1 bladder cancer substage could be a prognostic factor in assessing tumour progression, but such substaging has not been widely adopted because of problems with pathological diagnosis using cTURBT specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible advantages of en‐bloc TUR specimens in T1 substaging following assessment by a panel of 10 pathologists. Methods and results We assessed the substages in 123 patients (cTURBT, n = 91; ERBT, n = 32) who were diagnosed with pT1 bladder cancer. We randomly selected 10 ERBT specimens and 10 cTURBT specimens with cancer invasion areas equivalent to those of their corresponding ERBT specimens. Ten pathologists performed pT1 substaging for pT1a/b/c and pT1m/e in 20 patients (cTURBT, n = 10; ERBT, n = 10). We evaluated diagnostic times and rates of diagnostic concordance among these pathologists, comparing cTURBT and ERBT. The median diagnostic times per slide were 87.7 s [interquartile range (IQR) 71.9–109.2 s) for cTURBT and 54.7 s (IQR 46.0–59.6 s) for ERBT (P = 0.009). The rate of diagnostic concordance was significantly better for ERBT specimens. For pT1a/b/c, the median concordance rates were 50% for cTURBT and 80% for ERBT (P = 0.02); for pT1m/e, the median concordance rates were 70% for cTURBT and 90% for ERBT (P = 0.05). For pT1a/b/c, the average κ‐values between the pathologist and the standard diagnosis were 0.04 for cTURBT and 0.47 for ERBT. Conclusions The use of ERBT specimens shortened the diagnostic time and minimised interobserver variability for T1 substaging compared with the use of cTURBT specimens.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the adverse effects and outcomes of salvage re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT). The study was focused on the adverse effects and prognostic factors for treatment toxicity, followed by an analysis of patterns of failure and survival. Patients treated with sSBRT between 2012 and 2020 at a tertiary institution were included. The exclusion criteria were a primary or salvage radical prostatectomy or a palliative sSBRT dose. Patients with oligorecurrence were eligible if all metastatic lesions were treated locally with curative intent. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate time to grade ≥ 3 toxicity, local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS). The differences between groups (focal vs. whole-gland sSBRT) were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic factors for the listed endpoints. A total of 56 patients with a median age of 70.9 years and a median follow-up of 38.6 months were included in the analysis. The majority of them received local sSBRT only (45; 80.4%), while the rest were simultaneously treated for oligometastases (11; 19.6%). Overall, 18 (32.1%) patients experienced any grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 1 (6.7%) patient who received focal sSBRT, and 17 (41.5%) patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT. The Planning Target Volume (per cc; HR 1.01; 95% CI 1–1.02; p = 0.025) and use of ADT (yes vs. no; HR 0.35; 95%CI 0.13–0.93; p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for the risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The estimated rate of grade ≥3 adverse events was significantly higher (7.1% vs. 43.8% at 2 years; p = 0.006), and there was no improvement in the LC (92.9% vs. 85.3% at 2 years; p = 0.759) in patients treated with focal sSBRT compared to whole-gland sSBRT. The 2- and 5-year LC were 87.6% and 47.9%, respectively; the 2- and 5-year FFDM were 72.7% and 42.8%, respectively; and the 2- and 5-year PFS were 67.9% and 28.7%, respectively. The primary pattern of failure was distant metastasis. The sSBRT for local recurrence of PCa after definitive RT was associated with a high risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity, which significantly increased with the volume and extent of re-irradiation.

To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer. Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR. ResultsA reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features. ConclusionsA reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.

To assess the real-world clinical benefit of re-challenging chemotherapy after pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), as there have been several reports suggesting that programmed cell death protein-1/ programmed death-ligand 1inhibitors can restore platinum sensitivity. Patients and MethodsOf 236 patients treated with pembrolizumab, we excluded 45 patients who did not experience progressive disease (PD) for pembrolizumab during the follow-up and 86 patients who discontinued pembrolizumab by the diagnosis of PD followed by the best supportive care. A total of 105 patients were identified for a logistic regression propensity score model to compare the survival outcomes between patients treated with continuing pembrolizumab (80) and re-challenging chemotherapy (25) after the diagnosis of PD for pembrolizumab. ResultsA median overall survival (OS) from PD for pembrolizumab was 11 months in 105 patients. Of 25 patients treated with rechallenging chemotherapy, platinum-including chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin; gemcitabine/cisplatin/paclitaxel [GCP]; methotrexate and vinblastine and adriamycin and cisplatin; and methotrexate and carboplatin and vinblastine MCAVI) was offered in 20 patients (80%). The objective response rate (ORR) for the first-line chemotherapy in the 105 patients was 30%, with a comparable ORR in 25 patients treated with re-challenging chemotherapy of 28%. GCP as a rechallenging regimen was offered in 12 of 25 (48%) patients. The ORR for the GCP regimen was 50%. Propensity score matching was performed using putative clinical factors, from which 34 patients were identified as pair-matched groups. The OS for patients treated with re-challenging chemotherapy was significantly longer than continuing pembrolizumab (a median of 13.9 and 5.8 months, respectively: P = 0.048). ConclusionRe-challenging chemotherapy including platinum agents after PD with pembrolizumab offers clinical benefits in patients with mUC.