Background Nivolumab is a second‐line chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study explored the impact of clinical biomarkers such as neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C‐reactive protein:albumin ratio (CAR), and modified Glasgow prognostic score on the efficacy and outcome of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated NSCLC patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed advanced or postoperative recurrence of NSCLC in 113 patients in two Japanese facilities from January 2015 to December 2019. Optimal cutoff values of NLR and CAR were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves predicting death events to conduct regression analysis. Baseline values and values collected eight weeks after nivolumab treatment were measured to investigate time‐series changes of these markers. Results The patients showed median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of 14.0 months and 2.3 months, respectively, with both being significantly longer in patients with partial response (PR) than in patients with progressive disease (PD). Optimal cutoff levels for NLR and CAR were 5.8 and 0.83, with significant decrease in CAR (P = 0.002) from baseline levels in PR patients and significant increase in PD patients. Baseline CAR ≥0.83 was significantly associated with one‐year mortality events and overall survival (OS), and multivariate analysis showed significant association of age ≤70 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or 3, and a baseline CAR ≥0.83 with inferior OS. Conclusions For second‐line nivolumab therapy, evaluation of baseline CAR and subsequent changes in CAR may be predictive of therapeutic response to nivolumab and long‐term survival in NSCLC patients. Key points Significant findings of the study The baseline value of C‐reactive protein:albumin ratio was significantly associated with one‐year mortality and overall survival in non‐small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. What this study adds Time‐series change of C‐reactive protein:albumin ratio may be useful for predicting the treatment efficacy in patients treated with nivolumab.
Background The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple and useful marker for predicting prognosis and treatment efficacy among patients with various cancers. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no previous reports regarding the prognostic value of GNRI among patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods We retrospectively evaluated 85 patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC who were administered ICIs at Shinshu University Hospital between February 2016 and October 2020. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups with high (≥89.5) and low (<89.5) GNRI values. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify prognostic factors that were associated with PFS and OS. Results The high and low GNRI groups included 61 and 24 patients, respectively. Relative to the low GNRI group, the high GNRI group had significantly longer median PFS (3.7 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.041) and significantly longer median OS (14.2 vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.008). Multivariate analyses revealed that independent predictors of favorable OS were high GNRI, performance status of 0–1, and age of ≥70 years. The high GNRI group was significantly more likely to undergo subsequent therapy after immunotherapy (68.6 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.008). Conclusions The present study revealed that high GNRI was associated with good outcomes among patients with previously treated NSCLC who were treated with ICIs.
Background: Previous analyses of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) cohorts have provided conflicting data on the survival of patients with CPFE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical prognosis of acute exacerbations (AE) of CPFE. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had been treated at the Shinshu University Hospital (Matsumoto, Japan) between 2003 and 2017. We identified 21 patients with AE of CPFE and 41 patients with AE of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and estimated their prognoses using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Treatment content and respiratory management were not significantly different between the two groups before and after exacerbation. At the time of AE, the median serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level was significantly lower in the CPFE group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 966 U/μL; white blood cell count: 8810 /μL) than that in the IPF group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 2130 U/μL, p < 0.001; white blood cells: 10809/μL, p = 0.0096). The baseline Gender-Age-Physiology scores were not significantly different between the two groups (CPFE, 4.5 points; IPF, 4.7 points; p = 0.58). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the survival time after AE for patients with CPFE was longer than that for patients with IPF (p < 0.001, logrank test). Conclusions: Survival prognoses after AE were significantly better for patients with CPFE than that for those with IPF. Our findings may improve the medical treatment and respiratory management of patients with AE-CPFE.
Purpose: The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients undergoing immunotherapy has been reported to be a favorable prognostic factor in several studies. We aimed to examine the correlation between irAEs and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and further reveal the patient characteristics associated with response to immunotherapy among treatment responders who developed irAEs. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 80 patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy at Shinshu University Hospital between February 2016 and February 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with and those without irAEs. We examined the prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. We further analyzed the patients who developed irAEs by classifying them into responders and non-responders. Results: Twenty-five patients developed irAEs. The median PFS and OS of the patients with irAEs were significantly longer than those of the patients without irAEs (6.8 vs. 1.9 months, p < 0.001, and 37.8 vs. 8.1 months, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis associated with PFS and OS indicated that the development of irAEs was an independent favorable prognostic factor. Among the patients developing irAEs, the responder group had a significantly higher incidence of multiple irAEs than the non-responder group (41.7 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Our findings revealed that the development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefits in NSCLC patients who received immunotherapy. In particular, patients with multiple irAEs might have good prognoses.
Similar to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were favorable prognostic factors in several studies, for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, few studies have investigated patient characteristics and markers that predict the development of irAEs, and factors predicting the development of irAEs have not been clarified. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the predictive factors correlated with the development of irAEs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received antiprogrammed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor monotherapy. Patients and Methods: The present study was retrospectively enrolled 113 advanced NSCLC patients who received ICIs between February 2016 and May 2021 and was conducted at Shinshu University Hospital. All patients were divided into two groups according to with or without of irAEs. We compared the clinical findings and laboratory data between the two groups and considered predictive factors correlated with the development of irAEs. Results: Forty-four (38.9%) patients developed irAEs of any grade. The most common irAEs were hypothyroidism (12.4%), followed by skin rash (7.1%) and interstitial lung disease (7.1%). The survival time in patients with irAEs was significantly more prolonged compared to those without irAEs (median progression-free survival: 6.8 vs 2.1 months, p < 0.001; median overall survival: 25.3 vs 9.6 months, p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses based on logistic regression revealed independent predictive factors that correlated with the development of irAEs to be first-line ICI treatment and a score of 0 or 1 on LIPI. Conclusion:The present study revealed that lines of immunotherapy and LIPI were correlated with the development of irAEs in NSCLC patients who received ICIs and can help clinicians who manage patients experiencing irAEs receiving ICIs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.