BACKGROUND. Erlotinib, in combination with gemcitabine, has shown clinical benefits in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. The presence of EGFR mutations and increased EGFR copy numbers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma was explored. METHODS. Sixty‐six pancreatic cancer patients were included in the analysis. The EGFR mutation was analyzed by DNA sequencing of exons 18–21 in the tyrosine kinase domain. KRAS mutation was analyzed by sequencing codons 12, 13, and 61. Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze the copy number of EGFR. RESULTS. In the current study the EGFR mutation was harbored in only 1 (1.5%) of the 66 inoperable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Amino acid substitution was detected in exon 20 of the EGFR gene. Increased EGFR copy numbers (≥3.0 per cell) were detected in 26 (41%) patients. There was only 1 patient, who had a highly increased EGFR copy number (≥6.0 per cell), who died, 2.1 months from the date of diagnosis. The EGFR amplification did not significantly influence survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients (P = .935). Thirty‐two (49%) of the 65 pancreatic adenocarcinomas examined harbored a point mutation in codons 12 (n = 31) and 61 (n = 1) of the KRAS gene. The presence of a point mutation in codon 12 adversely influenced survival of pancreatic cancer patients (P = .030). CONCLUSIONS. The incidence of somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domains of EGFR was very low and the increased gene copy number of EGFR did not significantly influence survival. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Although erlotinib has become an important therapeutic option in addition to gemcitabine, the high frequency of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer probably limits the benefits. We retrospectively studied 136 pancreatic cancer patients with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 2003 to 2009 to understand the clinical significance of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. KRAS mutations were analyzed by sequencing codons 12, 13, and 61. In this study, 71 (52.2%) of the 136 pancreatic adenocarcinomas examined harbored a point mutation in codons 12 (n ¼ 70) and 61 (n ¼ 1) of KRAS. KRAS mutation was not associated with clinicopathologic parameters. Patients with KRAS mutations showed a worse response (11.3%) than those with wild-type KRAS (26.2%) and poor survival (mutant KRAS, 5.8 months vs. wild-type KRAS, 8.0 months; P ¼ 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed good prognostic factors for overall survival as well to moderately differentiated histology (P < 0.001; HR ¼ 0.437, 95% CI: 0.301-0.634), locally advanced disease (P < 0.001; HR ¼ 0.417, 95% CI: 0.255-0.681), response to first-line chemotherapy (P ¼ 0.003; HR ¼ 0.482, 95% CI: 0.297-0.780), and wild-type KRAS (P ¼ 0.001; HR ¼ 0.523, 95% CI: 0.355-0.770). However, the observed survival advantage is derived from the subgroup of patients treated with gemcitabine/erlotinib (9.7 vs. 5.2 months; P ¼ 0.002), whereas no survival difference based on KRAS mutation status is obvious in the other subgroup of patients treated without erlotinib (7.0 vs. 7.0 months; P ¼ 0.121). These results need to be further explored in upcoming prospective studies to provide a rationale for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) constitutes most primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL), whereas T-cell, low-grade and Burkitt’s lymphomas (BL) are rarely encountered. Due to the paucity of cases, little is known about the clinical features and treatment outcomes of PCNSL other than DLBCL. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with PCNSL other than DLBCL. Fifteen patients, newly diagnosed with PCNSLs other than DLBCL between 2000 and 2010, were included. The male to female ratio was 0.67:1 with a median age of diagnosis of 31 years (range 18–59). Pathologic distributions were as follows: peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; n = 7), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZBCL; n = 1), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL; n = 2), Burkitt’s lymphoma (n = 1), other unspecified (T-cell lineage, n = 2; B-cell lineage, n = 2). Thirteen patients (87%) showed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) 1–2. The remaining two were one PTCL patient and one Burkitt’s lymphoma patient. Of the nine patients with T-cell lymphoma, five (56%) had multifocal lesions, and one (20%) with LPL of the five patients with B-cell lymphoma showed a single lesion. Leptomeningeal lymphomatosis was identified in two patients (one with Burkitt’s lymphoma and one with unspecified B-cell lymphoma). Two patients (22%) with T-cell lymphoma died 7.7 and 23.3 months later, respectively, due to disease progression, despite HD-MTX-based therapy. Six patients with T-cell lymphoma (6/9, 66.7%) and four patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma (4/5, 80%) achieved complete response and have survived without relapse (Table 3). One patient with Burkitt’s lymphoma showed poor clinical features with ECOG PS 3, deep structure, multifocal, and leptomeningeal lymphomatosis, and died 7.6 months after the initiation of treatment. In comparison with previously reported DLBCLs (median OS 6.4 years, 95% CI 3.7–9.1 years), T-cell lymphoma showed equivocal or favorable clinical outcomes and low-grade B-cell lymphomas, such as MZBCL and LPL, had a good prognosis. However, primary CNS Burkitt’s lymphoma presented poor clinical outcomes and showed a comparatively aggressive clinical course. In conclusion, primary CNS lymphoma other than DLBCL occurred more in younger patients and showed a generally good prognosis, except for Burkitt’s lymphoma. Further research on treatment strategies for Burkitt’s lymphoma is needed.

Patients with locoregional NET had a favorable long-term survival after curative resection. Distant metastases, hepatobiliary localization and a poor degree of tumor cell differentiation were poor prognostic factors. Further investigational approaches for treatment of advanced disease are needed.

Introduction: For patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS), treatment options have been limited. Ifosfamide is an alkylating agent with well-demonstrated efficacy against STS, and dose-dependent activity. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate (PFR), and median duration of response to high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) as at least second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced bone sarcoma and STS. Patients and Methods: Thirty metastatic, unresectable sarcoma patients who were treated with HDI chemotherapy between May 1999 and November 2007 were included in the analysis. In total, 106 cycles (median 3 cycles; range 1–8 cycles) were administered. Twenty-one patients received treatment as second-line chemotherapy, and 9 patients as third-line treatment. HDI was given at a dose of 2 g/m² over 3 h, and at a dose of 2 g/m² per day; continuous infusion was administered on 6 consecutive days (2 g/m²/6 days) every 3 weeks. Results: After a median follow-up of 49 months (range 10–114), median PFS was 2.9 months (range 0.4–9.3) and median overall survival 8.7 months (range 0.4–57.8). The 3- and 6-month PFR were 47% (SE 9.1%) and 20% (SE 7.3%), respectively. Median response duration of HDI was 2.9 months (range 0.7–7.6). Of the 28 evaluable patients, 2 (7%) achieved complete response, 5 (18%) partial response, and 4 (14%) stable disease, and overall disease control was 39%. Two responders out of 7 (28.5%) and 4 patients out of 11 (36%) with controlled disease by HDI had a synovial sarcoma. Two patients were not evaluable because they were switched to another treatment due to ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was seen in 13 (43%) patients, and treatment-related death was observed in one patient. Conclusion: HDI at a total dose of 14 g/m² with mesna is still an active salvage regimen, particularly in patients with synovial sarcomas.

No abstract

Purpose: There are no reliable prognostic markers that identify gastric cancer patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. E2F-1 was shown to be associated with radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity in certain tumor types. Therefore, we analyzed expression and prognostic significance of E2F-1 along with thymidylate synthase (TS) in R 0 -resected gastric adenocarcinoma patients, who underwent adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin. Experimental Design: The chemosensitivity to 5-FU and radiosensitivity were tested in three E2F-1^overexpressed gastric cancer cell lines in vitro. The expressions of TS and E2F-1 were analyzed in 467 R 0 -resected primary gastric cancer patients, who received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with 5-FU and leucovorin using tissue microarray. Results: The E2F-1immunopositivity rate was 22.2% (103 of 465 samples) with a cutoff value of 5% immunoreactivity, whereas theTS-positive expression occurred in19.0% of the 463 tumors tested. Using stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, multivariate analyses showed that the E2F-1 immunopositivity predicted more favorable survival as compared with the E2F-1 immunonegativity with borderline statistical significance [P = 0.050, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.702, 95% confidence interval, 0.487, 1.013]. However, the E2F-1 immunopositivity did not retain its statistical significance at multivariate analysis for predicting disease-free survival (data not shown, P = 0.270), but stage was the only influential factor for disease-free survival in stages IB to IV (M 0 ) patients (P < 0.001).TS immunopositivity did not influence survival (P = 0.459) or disease-free survival (P = 0.447). Conclusion: E2F-1is a potentially novel independent prognostic factor that may identify gastric cancer patients who will likely benefit from adjuvant chemoradiation therapy following curative resection.

No abstract