Background: Smartphones have become novel healthcare tools for patients with diabetes. However, it is uncertain whether the smartphone application support system helps in glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and plausibility of smartphone-based integrated online real-time diabetes care. Methods: Forty patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to the smartphone-based care (SC) (n = 20) and conventional care (CC) (n = 20) groups for 12 weeks. The SC group was instructed to use smartphone application (Noom Coach) and a glucose meter, and was provided medical supervision based on blood glucose level and food intake information sent to the central database server. The efficacy was evaluated by glycated haemoglobin (A1C ≤ 6.5%). The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) questionnaire was collected at baseline and at week 12. Results: Seventeen and 18 patients of the SC and CC groups completed the study respectively. In the SC group, more patients achieved target A1C compared with the CC group (47.1% vs 11.1%, P = 0.019). In both group, SDSCA scores excluding the exercise item showed overall improvement (general diet, 1.4 AE 2.0 ! 2.6 AE 2.3 vs 0.4

BackgroundThe present study investigated the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin-metformin treatment compared to those of glimepiride-metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes.MethodsIn a randomized, open-label, comparative study, 106 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a reduction in HbA1c from baseline and secondary endpoints included fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-hour postprandial glucose (2h-PPG) reduction from baseline, as well as HbA1c responder rate and HbA1c reduction according to baseline HbA1c category.ResultsComparable HbA1c reduction was observed with a mean±standard deviation change from baseline to the 32-week endpoint of -0.94±1.15% in the vildagliptin group and -1.00±1.32% in the glimepiride group. A similar reduction in 2h-PPG (vildagliptin group 3.53±4.11 mmol/L vs. the glimepiride group 3.72±4.17 mmol/L) was demonstrated, and the decrements in FPG (vildagliptin group 1.54±2.41 mmol/L vs. glimepiride group 2.16±2.51 mmol/L) were not different between groups. The proportion of patients who achieved an HbA1c less than 7% at week 32 was 50.1% in the vildagliptin group and 56.0% in the glimepiride group. An average body weight gain of 2.53±1.21 kg in the glimepiride group was observed in contrast with the 0.23±0.69 kg weight gain noted in the vildagliptin group. A 10-fold lower incidence of hypoglycemia was demonstrated in the vildagliptin group, in addition to an absence of severe hypoglycemia.ConclusionVildagliptin-metformin treatment provided blood glucose control efficacy comparable to that of glimepiride-metformin treatment and resulted in better adverse event profiles with lower risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain.

No abstract

This open-label, prospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin as add-on therapy in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], 7.5-12%) who were already using three other types of orally active antidiabetic agents. A total of 268 T2D patients were enrolled and divided into two groups, empagliflozin (EMPA 25 mg/d, n = 142) or insulin glargine (INS, n = 126), respectively. After the treatment period of 24 weeks, HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were significantly reduced (HbA1c, P = 0.004; FPG, P = 0.008, respectively) in the EMPA group compared to the INS group. Also, EMPA treatment evoked a significant reduction in body weight (P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.017) compared to the INS group. Hypoglycaemic adverse events were significantly higher in the INS group compared to the EMPA group (P = 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a regimen comprising four different orally active antidiabetic agents, including EMPA, was effective and safe as a therapeutic strategy for treating T2D patients for glycaemic control and improvement of other cardiovascular and metabolic indices.