Purpose: Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair (IUMR) and postnatal myelomeningocele repair (PNMR) differ in terms of both setting and surgical technique. A simplified technique in IUMR, in which a dural onlay is used followed by skin closure, has been adopted at our institution. The goal of this study was to compare the rates of clinical tethering in IUMR and PNMR patients, as well as to evaluate the appearance on MRI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients with MMC repaired at our institution, with 2:1 PNMR to IUMR matching based on lesion level. A pediatric neuroradiologist blinded to the clinical details reviewed the patients’ lumbar spine MRIs for the distance from neural tissue to skin and the presence or absence of a syrinx. An EMR review was then done to evaluate for detethering procedures and need for CSF diversion.Results: Mean age at MRI was 4.0 years and mean age at last follow-up was 6.1 years, with no significant difference between the PNMR and IUMR groups. There was no significant difference between groups in the distance from neural tissue to skin (PNMR 13.5mm vs IUMR 17.6mm; p=0.5). There was no difference in need for detethering operations between groups (PNMR 12.5% vs IUMR 16.7%; RR 0.75; CI 0.1-5.1). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between postnatal- and intrauterine-repaired myelomeningocele on MRI or in need for detethering operations. These results imply that a more straightforward and time efficient IUMR closure technique does not lead to an increased rate of tethering when compared to the multilayered PNMR.
Purpose: Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair (IUMR) and postnatal myelomeningocele repair (PNMR) differ in terms of both setting and surgical technique. A simpli ed technique in IUMR, in which a dural onlay is used followed by skin closure, has been adopted at our institution. The goal of this study was to compare the rates of clinical tethering in IUMR and PNMR patients, as well as to evaluate the appearance on MRI.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients with MMC repaired at our institution, with 2:1 PNMR to IUMR matching based on lesion level. A pediatric neuroradiologist blinded to the clinical details reviewed the patients' lumbar spine MRIs for the distance from neural tissue to skin and the presence or absence of a syrinx. An EMR review was then done to evaluate for detethering procedures and need for CSF diversion.Results: Mean age at MRI was 4.0 years and mean age at last follow-up was 6.1 years, with no signi cant difference between the PNMR and IUMR groups. There was no signi cant difference between groups in the distance from neural tissue to skin (PNMR 13.5mm vs IUMR 17.6mm; p=0.5). There was no difference in need for detethering operations between groups (PNMR 12.5% vs IUMR 16.7%; RR 0.75; CI 0.1-5.1).Conclusions: There was no signi cant difference between postnatal-and intrauterine-repaired myelomeningocele on MRI or in need for detethering operations. These results imply that a more straightforward and time e cient IUMR closure technique does not lead to an increased rate of tethering when compared to the multilayered PNMR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.