In Brazil, gas and oil exploration and production (E&P) is ruled by environmental laws that do not meet its characteristics of integrated and sequential development of its activities. Thus, every well drilling, for instance, must be licensed. On the other hand, there are mechanisms predicted in general and basic laws by which the industries may have easier ways to get environmental permits, taking into consideration the activity types. Unfortunately, this has not been observed by environmental control agencies, by this way becoming the issue ‘environmental permits in Brazil’ hard and ‘heavy’. In 1998, E&P in State of Esp rito Santo (called in this paper as Company), Brazil, got success in dealing with the state environmental agency (EA) about validity conditions of a future permit. The new permit, issued by the end of 1998, comprises Company's usual onshore E&P activities, and determines that they could be developed without individual (site) permits. This paper shows, via case study, how the agreement was established and how the negotiations between Company and the government EA were carried out. This agreement ended in a global E&P permit that allows usual E&P activities be started regardless of government formal approval, provided EA be communicated 30 or 60 days before the beginning of the activity. After this lack of time, the activity can be developed. The activities are in general well drilling, seismic survey, oil and gas production and increasing of oil and gas pipeline capacities. The main conclusion that comes from this paper is that an enterprise should use strict ethical principles when talking to an EA. This results in a relationship of confidence between the parts, and occasional difficulties that usually appear in this kind of process are more easily solved. Introduction In 1996, Company and the EA came to the conclusion that the environmental permits of the Company s activities could not be released well by well any more, seismic survey by seismic survey, pipeline by pipeline, as ocurred since 1991, when the activities began to be more strictly ruled. Before that time, since 1959, when the E&P activities started in the region, there were not environmental laws to rule them. There were more than 70 processes for getting permits to well drilling, seismic survey, etc, just for the activities set up from 1991 to 1996. Time spent to get permits caused frequent breakdowns in the Company's operations. Activities were sometimes delayed due to the absence of permit. Brazilian government had just taken from Company the petroleum monopoly. Regulations for the monopoly break established that, in a first stage, Company would have three years to define which areas it would intend to keep on its activities. In order to get the rights on the areas, Petrobras should present studies which justified the reasons in being interested in them. Not showing the studies, or if the studies were not considered enough to get a conclusion, the areas would be put up for auction. The winners would get the rights from the Government to explore and develop the areas. Thus, Company could not wait for months, sometimes more than a year, to get permits. It has to be also taken into consideration that E&P activities are repetitive and are developed in areas already occupied by other types of economic activities. Overview The Region. Most of the region is placed on low lands, with drainage channels built by farmers that develop cattle-breeding on very large farms, with hundreds of hectares. The upper lands, in the western and northern area, are usually used for eucalypts culture. It has low demographic density, and its soil is mostly organic. The region extends towards west until around 40 km far from the shoreline (Fig. 1). The phreatic level is very close to the surface, and the surface water are influenced by tide oscilations. This may lead to a temporary water salinization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.