BackgroundLupus nephritis (LN), which occurs in 60-70% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality. There still are many uncertain aspects in clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics about LN.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare clinical features, outcomes, and to define the predictive factors of complete renal response (CRR) in patients with proliferative and non-proliferative LN.MethodsPatients with SLE followed between 2014 and 2020 at Hacettepe University Hospitals and who had a kidney biopsy were the subject of the study. One hundred and sixteen patients whose kidney biopsy reported as LN were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical features, laboratory values at the time of kidney biopsy, histopathological forms of LN, and renal response (complete or partial) were recorded. The predictive factors for CRR during the two-year follow-up after induction therapy were analyzed.ResultsOf 116 (93 females, 23 males) patients, 95 (81.9%) were in the proliferative (class III and IV) and 21 (18.1%) were in the non-proliferative group (class II and V). In the proliferative group, elevated basal creatinine, median daily proteinuria, anti-dsDNA positivity, low C3 and C4, the presence of active urinary sediment, and median renal SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores at the time of kidney biopsy were significantly higher than non-proliferative group. During the two-year follow-up after LN diagnosis, 70 patients achieved CRR and time-to-CRR was similar for the groups (p=0.64, log-rank). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that achieving CRR was associated with female gender [HR: 2.15 (1.19-3.89 95% CI), p=0.011], newly diagnosed SLE with renal biopsy [2.15 (1.26-3.67), p=0.005], hypertension [0.40 (0.27-0.94), p=0.032], eGFR increase [1.01 (1.00-1.01), p=0.046], and presence of active urinary sediment [0.46 (0.22-0.96), p=0.039].ConclusionAchieving CRR was similar in both the proliferative and non-proliferative LN patients although certain laboratory parameters differed at onset. Our results indicated the importance of kidney biopsy in the decision-making of treatment of SLE patients with renal involvement and that the defined factors associated with CRR achievement help to predict good renal response.Table 1.Demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of the patients with LNVariables*All patientsProliferative LNNon-Proliferative LNpn=116n=95n=21Age at SLE diagnosis, years18.3 (16)19.2 (15)16 (16)0.32Sex, female93 (80.2)75 (78.9)18 (85.7)0.48Age at kidney biopsy, years21 (17.7)22 (17)18 (15)0.19Patients newly diagnosed SLE with renal biopsy65 (56)53 (55.8)12 (57.1)0.91Follow-up time for LN, years5.5 (8)5.1 (8.2)6.2 (5.1)0.80SLE disease duration8 (8.7)8.1 (9.6)7.9 (7.3)0.53Hypertension31 (26.7)26 (27.4)5 (23.8)0.74Laboratory values on the kidney biopsy Creatinine level (mg/dL)0.7 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.56 (0.1)0.006 Creatinine > UNL37 (32.5)34 (36.6)3 (14.3)0.04 eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2)113 (54)107 (54)129 (45)0.04 Albumin (g/dL)3.3 (1.1)3.1 (1.2)3.5 (1)0.09 24-hour urine protein, gr/day2.3 (3.3)2.4 (3.6)0.9 (1.8)0.03 Anti-dsDNA positivity94 (81)80 (87.9)14 (70)0.04 Low C3 and C4 levels93 (80.2)81 (88)12 (57.1)0.001 Active urinary sediment91 (83.5)78 (89.8)12 (57.1)<0.001Renal SLEDAI12 (8)12 (8)4 (4)<0.001During the two-year follow-up after LN diagnosis Complete renal response70 (70.7)56 (70.9)14 (70)0.99 Partial renal response23 (23.2)17 (21.5)6 (30)0.64 No response6 (6.1)6 (7.6)0NA Relapse20 (21.5)15 (20.5)5 (25)0.84 ESRD4(4)4 (4.2)0NA Death3 (3)3 (3.2)0NA* n (%), if otherwise specified; median (IQR) for numeric valuesESRD: End-stage renal disease, GFR: Glomerular filtration rate, LN: Lupus nephritis, SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus, SLEDAI: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; UNL: Upper normal limitFigure 1.Kaplan-Meier survival curve for complete renal response (CRR) achievement during the two-year follow-up according to the kidney biopsy resultsDisclosure of InterestsNone declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.