BackgroundEnvironmental enrichment (EE) in laboratory animals improves neurological function and motor/cognitive performance, and is proposed as a strategy for treating neurodegenerative diseases. EE has been investigated in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease (HD), where increased social interaction, sensory stimulation, exploration, and physical activity improved survival. We have also shown previously that HD patients and R6/2 mice have disrupted circadian rhythms, treatment of which may improve cognition, general health, and survival.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe examined the effects of EE on the behavioral phenotype and circadian activity of R6/2 mice. Our mice are typically housed in an “enriched” environment, so the EE that the mice received was in addition to these enhanced housing conditions. Mice were either kept in their home cages or exposed daily to the EE (a large playground box containing running wheels and other toys). The “home cage” and “playground” groups were subdivided into “handling” (stimulated throughout the experimental period) and “no-handling” groups. All mice were assessed for survival, body weight, and cognitive performance in the Morris water maze (MWM). Mice in the playground groups were more active throughout the enrichment period than home cage mice. Furthermore, R6/2 mice in the EE/no-handling groups had better survival than those in the home cage/no-handling groups. Sex differences were seen in response to EE. Handling was detrimental to R6/2 female mice, but EE increased the body weight of male R6/2 and WT mice in the handling group. EE combined with handling significantly improved MWM performance in female, but not male, R6/2 mice.Conclusions/SignificanceWe show that even when mice are living in an enriched home cage, further EE had beneficial effects. However, the improvements in cognition and survival vary with sex and genotype. These results indicate that EE may improve the quality of life of HD patients, but we suggest that EE as a therapy should be tailored to individuals.

Introduction: Stage III melanoma is associated with poor outcomes. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of patients with resected Stage III melanoma before the routine use of adjuvant immunotherapy. Some of these patients received adjuvant nodal radiation with modern radiation techniques. Methods: We retrieved data of patients with resected Stage III melanoma treated in Christchurch over 10 years. Overall survival (OS), melanomaspecific survival (MSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and nodal recurrencefree rate (NRFR) were determined, and the association of these outcomes with tumour and treatment factors was investigated. Results: We identified 178 patients (110 male and 68 female), of whom 61 received adjuvant radiation. The median age was 66.6 years, and the median follow-up was 2.7 years. First recurrences occurred in 108 (61%) patients. There were 42 (24%) nodal field relapses and 103 (58%) distant relapses. Onehalf of nodal relapses in patients treated with adjuvant radiation were infield. The 5-year OS, RFS, MSS and NRFR were 46.4%, 26.8%, 53.7% and 69.6%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved RFS and no OS benefit. T4 disease and extranodal spread were associated with poorer OS, while extranodal spread and >3 involved nodes were associated with worse RFS. Conclusion: Patients treated with adjuvant radiation remain at moderate risk of regional and high risk of distant relapse, despite the use of modern radiation techniques. Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved local control but infield recurrence rates remained a problem. The role of combined adjuvant radiation and immunotherapy in improving these outcomes requires further investigation.