SummaryA can't intubate, can't ventilate scenario can result in morbidity and death. Although a rare occurrence (1:50 000 general anaesthetics), it is crucial that anaesthetists maintain the skills necessary to perform cricothyroidotomy, and are well‐equipped with appropriate tools. We undertook a bench study comparing a new device, Surgicric®, with two established techniques; the Melker Emergency Cricothyroidotomy, and a surgical technique. Twenty‐five anaesthetists performed simulated emergency cricothyroidotomy on a porcine model, with the primary outcome measure being insertion time. Secondary outcomes included success rate, tracheal trauma and ease of use. The surgical technique was fastest. The median (IQR [range]) was 81 (62–126 [37–300]) s, followed by the Melker 124 (100–217 [71–300]) s, and the Surgicric 127 (68–171 [43–300]), p = 0.003. The Surgicric device was the most traumatic, as evaluated by a blinded Ear, Nose and Throat surgeon. Subsequently, the authors contacted the device manufacturer, who has now modified the kit in the hope that its clinical application might be improved. Further studies are required to evaluate the revised model.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The rapid expansion of internet and social media use has meant that both useful and potentially harmful health information can spread rapidly. Groups experiencing barriers to health systems may be more reliant on social media as a source of health information. We did a systematic review to determine the extent and nature of social media use in migrant and ethnic minority communities for COVID-19 information, and implications for preventative health measures including vaccination intent and uptake. Methods We reviewed published and grey literature following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registered CRD42021259190). Global research was included that reported on the use of social media by migrants and/or ethnic minority groups in relation to COVID-19. Results 1849 unique records were screened, and 21 data sources included in our analysis involving studies from the UK, US, China, Jordan, Qatar, and Turkey. We found evidence of consistent use of a range of social media platforms for COVID-19 information in some migrant and ethnic minority populations (including WeChat, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube), which may stem from difficulty in accessing COVID-19 information in their native languages or from trusted sources. There were positive and negative associations with social media use reported, with some evidence suggesting circulating misinformation and social media use may be associated with lower participation in preventative health measures, including vaccine intent and uptake, findings of which are likely relevant to multiple population groups. Conclusions Urgent actions and further research are now needed to better understand the use of social media platforms for accessing health information by groups who may be marginalised from health systems, effective approaches to tackling circulating misinformation, and to seize on opportunities to make better use of social media platforms to support public health communication. Key messages