The discrepancies in the values of longitudinal magnetic field obtained from magnetographic records in different spectral lines are considered. On the basis of extensive data including 60 pairs of magnetographic maps for 11 spectral lines, obtained simultaneously for one of these lines and 26103 with the aid of the Crimean double channel magnetograph, the following conclusions have been reached. The relative field strength 6(20 = Hil(2i)/Hil (6103) depends partly on the distance from the center of the disk ( Figure 4) and mainly on the magnetic sensitivity of the line g22 (Figure 3), pointing to the primary role of saturation effect. The possible influence of line asymmetry on these discrepancies is also suggested.The difficulties arising for the quantitative comparison of magnetographic response with the strength of a magnetic field were pointed out by Severny (1967). A new reason for a critical analysis of the magnetographic measurements of magnetic fields comes out of , who revealed (outside sunspots) that the strengths of longitudinal field Hal in the line Fe/I 5250 A are systematically twice as low as in the line Fe/I 5233/~. In accordance with the results of Sheeley (1967), this striking discrepancy was ascribed to the higher temperature sensitivity of the line 5250/~, and thus in 'magnetic knots', which are supposed to be hotter than the surroundings, there should be a local weakening of the spectral line with a small excitation potential of the lower term (0.12 eV). This statement was supported by Frazier (1970), Wiehr (1970), Howard and Stenflo (1972) all expressing some doubt in the confidence of magnetographic measurements in the line 5250 A and in other photospheric lines with small excitation potential because the use of such lines is thought to lead to an underestimate of the true field.In fact, several authors, e.g. Tsap (1969) andFrazier (1970), have established a definite correlation between the field strengths and the central residual intensities. Therefore with accurate measurements of magnetic field, the variations of the line profile in magnetic regions should be explained. The best example in this respect is presented by measures in the line K z where one can get not only a false value of the field strength but even a false polarity (Severny, 1966).Nevertheless the tentative explanation suggested by Harvey and Livingston (1969) does not seem to be credible from several points of view. First, the profile of 5250/~ line, like the whole effect, does not show the dependence on the value of Hll. It is hard to reconcile this fact with the statement about the temperature as a decisive factor, as if that were the case we should expect different values of temperature to correspond to different degrees of line weakening, i.e. to various values of the ratio 5 = Hll (5250)/Hrl (5233), whereas the observations indicate the value of 6 independent of the Solar Physics 31 (1973) 307-316. All Rights Reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.