The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, launched on 14 May 2009, is the third-generation space experiment in the field of cosmic microwave background (CMB) research. It will image the anisotropies of the CMB over the whole sky, with unprecedented sensitivity ( ΔT T ∼ 2 × 10 −6 ) and angular resolution (∼5 arcmin). Planck will provide a major source of information relevant to many fundamental cosmological problems and will test current theories of the early evolution of the Universe and the origin of structure. It will also address a wide range of areas of astrophysical research related to the Milky Way as well as external galaxies and clusters of galaxies. The ability of Planck to measure polarization across a wide frequency range (30−350 GHz), with high precision and accuracy, and over the whole sky, will provide unique insight, not only into specific cosmological questions, but also into the properties of the interstellar medium. This paper is part of a series which describes the technical capabilities of the Planck scientific payload. It is based on the knowledge gathered during the on-ground calibration campaigns of the major subsystems, principally its telescope and its two scientific instruments, and of tests at fully integrated satellite level. It represents the best estimate before launch of the technical performance that the satellite and its payload will achieve in flight. In this paper, we summarise the main elements of the payload performance, which is described in detail in the accompanying papers. In addition, we describe the satellite performance elements which are most relevant for science, and provide an overview of the plans for scientific operations and data analysis.

Burst structures in the near wall region of turbulent flows are associated with a large portion of the turbulent momentum transport from the wall. However, quantitative measures of the timescales associated with the burst event are not well defined, largely due to ambiguities associated with the methods used to detect a burst.In the present study, Eulerian burst-detection schemes were developed through extensions of the uv quadrant 2, VITA, and u-level techniques. Each of the basic techniques detects ejections. One or more ejections are contained in each burst and hence the key idea is to identify and to group those ejections from a single burst into a single-burst detection. When the ejection detections were grouped appropriately into burst detections, all of the extended techniques yielded the same average time between bursts as deduced from flow visualization for fully-developed channel flow in the range 8700 [les ] Reh [les ] 17 800. The present results show that inner variables (wall shear stress and kinematic viscosity) are the best candidates for the proper scaling of the average time between bursts. Conditional velocity sampling during burst and ejection detections shows that these burst events are closely correlated with slower-than-average moving fluid, moving both away from the wall and toward the wall.

When drag-reducing additives are confined entirely to the linear sublayer of a turbulent channel flow of water, both the spanwise spacing and bursting rate of the wall-layer structure are the same as those for a water flow and there is no evidence of drag reduction. Drag reduction is measured downstream of the location where the additives injected into the sublayer begin to mix in significant quantities with the buffer region (10 < y+ < 100)The superscript + denotes a dimensionless quantity scaled with the kinematic viscosity ν and the wall shear velocity v* = (τw/ρ)½. of the channel flow. At streamwise locations where drag reduction does occur and where the injected fluid is not yet uniformly mixed with the channel flow, the dimensionless spanwise streak spacing increases and the average bursting rate decreases. The decrease in bursting rate is larger than the corresponding increase in streak spacing. The wall-layer structure is like the structure in the flow of a homogeneous, uniformly mixed, drag-reducing solution. Thus, the additives have a direct effect on the flow processes in the buffer region and the linear sublayer appears to have a passive role in the interaction of the inner and outer portions of a turbulent wall layer.

No abstract