Purpose: Prior molecular profiling of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has identified actionable findings that may have a role in guiding therapeutic decision-making and clinical trial enrollment. We implemented prospective next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the clinic to determine whether such analyses provide predictive and/or prognostic information for HCC patients treated with contemporary systemic therapies. Experimental Design: Matched tumor/normal DNA from patients with HCC (N ¼ 127) were analyzed using a hybridization capture-based NGS assay designed to target 341 or more cancer-associated genes. Demographic and treatment data were prospectively collected with the goal of correlating treatment outcomes and drug response with molecular profiles. Results: WNT/b-catenin pathway (45%) and TP53 (33%) alterations were frequent and represented mutually exclusive molecular subsets. In sorafenib-treated patients (n ¼ 81), oncogenic PI3K-mTOR pathway alterations were associated with lower disease control rates (DCR, 8.3% vs. 40.2%), shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 1.9 vs. 5.3 months), and shorter median overall survival (OS; 10.4 vs. 17.9 months). For patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (n ¼ 31), activating alteration WNT/b-catenin signaling were associated with lower DCR (0% vs. 53%), shorter median PFS (2.0 vs. 7.4 months), and shorter median OS (9.1 vs. 15.2 months). Twenty-four percent of patients harbored potentially actionable alterations including TSC1/2 (8.5%) inactivating/truncating mutations, FGF19 (6.3%) and MET (1.5%) amplifications, and IDH1 missense mutations (<1%). Six percent of patients treated with systemic therapy were matched to targeted therapeutics. Conclusions: Linking NGS to routine clinical care has the potential to identify those patients with HCC likely to benefit from standard systemic therapies and can be used in an investigational context to match patients to genome-directed targeted therapies. See related commentary by Pinyol et al., p. 2021

No abstract

Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases is 24% with an observed 20% cure rate. Patients with both high clinical risk score and extrahepatic disease have an estimated probability of cure less than 5%. When such factors are identified, strong consideration may be given to preoperative strategies, such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to help select patients for surgical therapy.

Objective To analyze the natural history of small asymptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and to present a matched comparison between groups who underwent either initial observation or resection. Management approach for small PanNET is uncertain. Methods Incidentally discovered, sporadic, small (<3 cm), stage I–II PanNET were analyzed retrospectively between 1993 and 2013. Diagnosis was determined either by pathology or imaging characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied. Results A total of 464 patients were reviewed. Observation was recommended for 104 patients (observation group), and these patients were matched to 77 patients in the resection group based on tumor size at initial imaging. The observation group was significantly older (median 63 vs. 59 years, p = 0.04) and tended towards shorter follow-up (44 vs. 57 months, p = 0.06). Within the observation group, 26 of the 104 patients (25 %) underwent subsequent tumor resection after a median observation interval of 30 months (range 7–135). At the time of last follow-up of the observation group, the median tumor size had not changed (1.2 cm, p = 0.7), and no patient had developed evidence of metastases. Within the resection group, low-grade (G1) pathology was recorded in 72 (95 %) tumors and 5 (6 %) developed a recurrence, which occurred after a median of 5.1 (range 2.9–8.1) years. No patient in either group died from disease. Death from other causes occurred in 11 of 181 (6 %) patients. Conclusions In this study, no patient who was initially observed developed metastases or died from disease after a median follow-up of 44 months. Observation for stable, small, incidentally discovered PanNET is reasonable in selected patients.

cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) carries a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 11 months. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of high-dose chemotherapy may have potential benefit in these patients.OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical outcomes when HAI chemotherapy is combined with systemic chemotherapy in patients with unresectable IHC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA single-institution, phase 2 clinical trial including 38 patients was conducted with HAI floxuridine plus systemic gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable IHC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between May 20, 2013, and June 27, 2019. A confirmatory phase 1/2 study using the same therapy was conducted during the same time period at Washington University in St Louis. Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable IHC were eligible. Resectable metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes and prior systemic therapy were permitted. Patients with distant metastatic disease were excluded.INTERVENTIONS Hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine and systemic administration of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) of 80% at 6 months. RESULTSFor the phase 2 clinical trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 42 patients with unresectable IHC were included and, of these, 38 patients were treated (13 [34%] men; median [range] age at diagnosis, 64 [39-81] years). The median follow-up was 30.5 months. Twenty-two patients (58%) achieved a partial radiographic response, and 32 patients (84%) achieved disease control at 6 months. Four patients had sufficient response to undergo resection, and 1 patient had a complete pathologic response. The median PFS was 11.8 months (1-sided 90% CI, 11.1) with a 6-month PFS rate of 84.1% (90% CI, 74.8%-infinity), thereby meeting the primary end point (6-month PFS rate, 80%). The median OS was 25.0 months (95% CI, 20.6-not reached), and the 1-year OS rate was 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2%-99.8%). Patients with resectable regional lymph nodes (18 [47%]) showed no difference in OS compared with patients with node-negative disease (24-month OS: lymph node negative: 60%; 95% CI, 40%-91% vs lymph node positive: 50%; 95% CI, 30%-83%; P = .66). Four patients (11%) had grade 4 toxic effects requiring removal from the study (1 portal hypertension, 2 gastroduodenal artery aneurysms, 1 infection in the pump pocket). Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in survival in patients with IDH1/2 mutated tumors (2-year OS, 90%; 95% CI, 73%-99%) vs wild-type (2-year OS, 33%; 95% CI, 18%-63%) (P = .01). In the Washington University in St Louis confirmatory cohort, 9 patients (90%) achieved disease control at 6 months; the most common grade 3 toxic effect was elevated results of liver function tests, and median PFS was 12.8 months (1-sided 90% CI, 6.4). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEHepatic arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy appears to be highly active and tolerable in patients with unresectable IHC; further evaluation is warranted.

For patients with suspected IPMNs, we present an independently validated model for the prediction of high-risk disease.

Objective To evaluate outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and concurrent extrahepatic disease (EHD) and to define prognostic factors. Background There is increasing evidence to support resection of LM and concurrent EHD in selected patients. Long-term survival data are lacking, and prognostic factors are not well defined. Methods Retrospective review of 219 patients between January 1992 and December 2012 who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM and resection of synchronous EHD. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed. A scoring system for prognostication was developed. Results The median, 3, 5 and 10 year overall survival were 34.4 months, 49%, 28%, and 10%, respectively. Disease recurred in 185 patients (90.2%) at a median of 8 months. There were 8 actual 10-year survivors. The site of EHD affected survival, with portal, retroperitoneal nodes and multiple sites associated with the worst prognoses. The size of the largest CRLM, the number of CRLM, unfavorable site of EHD, and progression of CRLM on neoadjuvant therapy were associated with overall survival on univariate and multivariate analyses. Three variables, assigned one point each, were used to create an EHD risk score: largest CRLM >3cm, >5 CRLM, and unfavorable site of EHD. The resulting score was prognostic of overall and recurrence-free survival. Conclusions Long-term survival is possible after resection of LM and concurrent EHD, but true cure is rare. A proposed scoring system may identify patients most likely to benefit from surgery.

398 Background: There have been conflicting results about whether KRAS mutation influences outcome in patients (pts) with colorectal cancer. In pts who underwent liver resection, Karagkounis reported a worse recurrence and survival in KRAS mutated (MUT) patients (ASCO 2012, abs 3616). Methods: In 105 pts who underwent liver resection and received adjuvant (adj) hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy and in whom KRAS data was available, we evaluated recurrence patterns and survival. Correlation between KRAS and clinical factors such as prior chemotherapy, post operative CEA, clinical risk score, and stage at diagnosis was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate median overall recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 4 years. Log-rank test was used to determine whether survival functions differed by KRAS mutation status. Cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the probability of time from adj therapy to bone, brain, lung and liver metastases separately. Results: Of 105 patients, 76 were KRAS wildtype (WT), and 29 were KRAS MUT (26-G12 and 3-G13). The median RFS was 26 months for KRAS WT pts and 15 months for KRAS MUT pts (p=0.08). OS at 4 years was 88% [95% CI: 78%-94%] for KRAS WT and 78% [95% CI: 57%-90%] for KRAS MUT pts (p= 0.15). Cumulative incidence of developing bone, brain, lung, and liver metastases by 2 years is presented in the Table. The cumulative incidence of bone and brain metastases at 2 years was 0% and 0% in KRAS WT pts versus 16.4% [95% CI: 1.1%-31.7%] and 4.7% [95% CI: 0%-14.1%] in KRAS MUT pts (Table). There was no association between clinical factors and KRAS status. Conclusions: KRAS MUT pts appeared to have worse OS and RFS, although we were unable to show a significant difference between KRAS WT and MUT for OS and RFS. In addition, cumulative incidence of bone and brain metastases at 2 years appeared to be higher for KRAS MUT pts as compared to WT pts. Results are based on small sample size and further investigation is needed. [Table: see text]