[CUH] a Regional Cancer Centre in Ireland. Its purpose is to streamline the pathway and facilitate prompt review and timely delivery of palliative radiotherapy [PRT] for symptom relief of patients with terminal cancer. This study reviews the clinical activity of the RAPC over the initial 3 months and compares it to a second 3 months to evaluate if we are meeting the objectives of the program. Materials/Methods: From the CUH oncology patient information system (Lantis) database, we retrieved the number of patients referred to the RAPC, their demographics, diagnosis and treatment for 1st September to 30th November, 2014 inclusive. We calculated the time interval between referral to consultation, consultation to simulation and the percentage of patients who started PRT on the day of their initial RAPC consultation. We calculated the 30day mortality of the clinic. We also compared the data from the initial 3 months against a 3 month period from 1st May to 31st July, 2016 inclusive, when there was no clinic due to staffing shortages. Results: During the initial 3 month period, the number of cases seen in consultation was 129. Patient's ages ranged from 28.4 to 96 years with a mean age of 69.1 years. Most common primary tumour sites were Genitourinary and Lung accounting for 25% and 21% of the patient population respectively. Most common indication for PRT was bone pain accounting for 69% of patients seen in the clinic. The 30-day mortality rate was 13.95%. Of the 122 patients who received PRT, 57 patients (46.7%) received single fraction PRT whilst 65 patients (53.2%) received fractionated PRT. 98% were seen within 2 weeks of referral (87% within 1 week). The median time from consultation to simulation was 0.9 days vs 2.7 days with no RAPC. 74% were simulated on the day of their initial consultation vs 31.4% with no RAPC. 35% started their PRT treatment on the day of their consultation visit vs 23% with no RAPC. Conclusion: The overall median interval from referral to consultation was 4 days. Thirty-five percent were simulated, planned and started treatment on the day of their initial consultation. The 30-day mortality rate suggests appropriate patient selection. The comparison between the initial 3 months of the RAPC vs the 3 months with no RAPC showed the median time from consultation to simulation tripled and only twenty-three percent received same day 2 Morris; A Rapid Access Palliative Clinic to reduce waiting time for palliative radiotherapy in a Regional Cancer Centre in Ireland treatment. Setting up a dedicated clinic decreased waiting times, reduced the number of visits to the Regional Cancer Centre and provided prompt PRT to symptomatic patients in the terminal phase of their illness. The RAPC is therefore meeting our objectives.
BackgroundImaging protocols are implemented to identify and minimise set-up errors. A crucial component to the success of these protocols is staff compliance.Materials and methodsThis is case report describing a retrospective review of radiation therapists’ compliance to a palliative imaging protocol in a single large institution in one calendar year.ResultsThe review showed a non-compliance to protocol for 8% of treatments. The most frequent protocol deviation was a failure to calculate the mean set-up displacement after 2/3 days of consecutive imaging.ConclusionDespite the presence of institutional evidence-based palliative imaging protocol unwanted deviations in practice can occur.
Background: Accuracy and reproducibility of the patient’s position is crucial for successful delivery of radiotherapy (RT). Data on palliative patients’ set-up uncertainties are sparse. The aim of this study was to calculate set-up errors observed for palliative patients positioned using one skin mark (Group 1) versus three skin marks (Group 2) and to assess the accuracy of both approaches. Methods: Displacements in the left–right (L–R) and superior–inferior (S–I) directions were retrospectively analysed for 175 sites treated with a course of fractionated palliative RT. Population mean, systematic and random errors were calculated in both directions for patients positioned with one and three skin marks. Frequency of deviations was also examined for both groups. Results: The population mean, systematic and random errors for Group 1 and 2 for the L–R direction were 0·0, 4·4, 4·8 and 0·4, 3·1 and 3·3 mm, respectively, and in the S–I direction: 0·1, 3·4, 4·2 and 1·2, 2·7 and 3·3 mm, respectively. Frequency of images within the clinical tolerance of 5 mm was 47·1% for Group 1 and 65·9% for Group 2. Conclusion: Three skin marks are recommended for patients receiving a fractionated course of palliative RT, as it reduces set-up error, reduces the number of gross displacements (>10 mm) and increases the number of displacements within the clinically acceptable tolerance of 5 mm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.