Background:Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major public health problem which in turn imposes a significant burden on health care systems because of high morbidity and mortality. Although the multifactorial etiology of CAD increases with age, but in recent years, the incidence is increasing among younger age groups.Objectives:In this study we aimed to evaluate the effect of age on risk profile, inflammatory response and the angiographic findings in patients with ACS.Patients and Methods:The study comprised 253 ACS patients. Seventy six (30%) with UA, 56 (22%) with NSTEMI and 121(48%) with STEMI diagnosis. The value of Hs-CRP, lipid profile, cardiac enzymes, risk factors, EF% and angiographic score were analyzed and compared in different age groups.Results:Group 1 (n = 68) with age <45 years, group II (n = 110) with age ≥45–<65 years and group III (n = 75) ≥65 years. Group I had more prevalence of male sex, smoking, family history, hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of HDL (P < 0.01), higher incidence of STEMI (P < 0.01) and lower prevalence of UA (P < 0.01). Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and female gender were more common in older groups. Hs-CRP was significantly lower in the young age (group I). Group I showed a preponderance of single-vessel disease, lower coronary atherosclerotic score and prevalent left anterior descending artery (LAD) involvement compared with older age groups. Hs-CRP was positively correlated to severity of CAD only in older groups. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that age, male gender, cardiac enzymes and EF% were common predictors of multivessel disease. Smoking was independent predictor in young patients <45 years while diabetes and Hs-CRP was the key predictor in older patient groups.Conclusion:Young patients with ACS had different clinical, angiographic and biochemical profile. Hs-CRP peak concentration did not correlate with angiographic findings in young patients that could be attributed to different risk profile and discrete underlying mechanism.

No abstract

Evaluation of left ventricular function in the presence of valvular regurgitation is still a clinical problem because ejection phase indices including ejection fraction are heavily dependent on preload and afterload and cannot be regarded as reliable indices of contractility in diseases associated with altered loading conditions. The authors attempted to evaluate the usefulness of the new index-corrected ejection fraction in the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic mitral (MR) or aortic regurgitation (AR). The study included 21 patients with chronic severe MR (11 patients) and AR (10 patients) with a mean age of 18 years. All patients underwent valve replacement or repair. Echo Doppler study was performed preoperatively and postoperatively and included measurement of the following LV parameters: end-diastolic dimension (EDD), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic dimension (ESD), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), systolic blood pressure/end-systolic dimension (SBP/ESD); also mitral and aortic stroke volume were calculated cross-sectional area (CSA) x time velocity integral TVI. Corrected ejection fraction (EFc) was derived from the following equation: EFc = [EF + square root of (ASV x MSV) / EDV] / 2. The mean preoperative EFc did not change significantly after surgical correction of mitral or aortic regurgitation. Preoperative EFc did not show significant difference compared with postoperative EF in the two groups. Preoperative EFc correlated significantly with other preoperative and postoperative indices of LV function. Postoperative EFc showed very close correlation with other postoperative parameters. Thus, using the new index-corrected ejection fraction in the assessment of LV function in patients with mitral or aortic regurgitation has several advantages: Noninvasive, independent of loading changes, helpful in predicting the immediate postoperative clinical course, and a reliable index for evaluation of LV systolic function preoperatively and postoperatively.

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. In 2010, about 7 out of total 53 million deaths were due to ischemic heart disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of serum bilirubin level with the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and Methods: 70 patients with STEMI who were undergoing primary PCI were included in the study. All the patients included in the study were subjected to full routine investigations and standard coronary angiographic projections. Total bilirubin level was measured and the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 was with serum TB (<1 mg/dl) and Group 2 was with serum TB (>1 mg/dl). Severity and complexity of coronary artery lesions will be assessed using Gensini score. Results: After PCI, the two studied groups were compared regarding the number of vessels affected by one and more than one vessel disease.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is often silent in diabetic patients, and it is typically in advanced stages of development by the time it manifests. Various forms of stress testing have been investigated to detect obstructive CAD in diabetes mellitus. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic value of dobutamine stress pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) compared with standard wall motion analysis in detection of myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients with suspected CAD. Methods: The study comprised 46 diabetic patients with suspected CAD underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) with DTI within 4 weeks before coronary angiography(CA). Dobutamine infusion started at 5 µ/kg/min and increased up to 40 µ/kg/min with additional atropine during submaximal heart rate responses. In addition to wall-motion score index (WMSI) analysis, pulsedwave DTI examination of basal and mid segments of posteroseptal, lateral, anterior, inferior and anteroseptal walls was performed. Myocardial velocities were measured at rest in the apical 4, 3 and 2-chamber views. The measurements were repeated at low dose (10 -15 µ/kg/min) and at peak stress (40 µ/kg/min). DTI measurements included peak systolic velocity (S), peak early diastolic velocity (E) and peak late diastolic velocity (A) and the results were compared to WMSI analysis. Patients were classified into two groups according to CA results; group (I) diabetics with positive CA (n = 27) and group (II) diabetics with negative CA (n = 19). Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in duration of diabetes, global WMSI at rest or the ∆ changes (stress-rest/rest) of WMSI (P > 0.05). Global S and global E were significantly lower in group I compared to group II at peak stress (11.3 ± 3.7 cm/sec vs. 14.5 ± 2.2 cm/sec, p < 0.01) and (11.3 ± 1.6 cm/sec vs. 13.1 ± 2.1 cm/sec, p < 0.01) respectively. The cutoff points for global S and global E to detect obstructive CAD in diabetics were 11.3 cm/s and 11.2 cm/s respectively with 75.7%, 73.4% sensitivity and 94.7%, 89.47% specificity respectively. An increment (∆ changes) less than 0.56 in S or 0.26 in E from rest to peak stress identified CAD with 78.8 %, 89.3% sensitivity and 94.7%, 90.7% specificity respectively. The accuracy of DTI parameters during peak stress was higher than WMSI analysis (sensitivity 74.1% vs. 59.3% and specificity 90% vs. 79%, P < 0.01 for each). In multivariate regression analysis, only ∆S and ∆E were independent predictors of obstructive CAD in diabetics (odd ratio: 36.16, 95% CI, 1.34-532.01 and 63.77, 95% CI, 3.19-721.47) respectively. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis, using DTI during DSE, adds new dimension in diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. It is more sensitive, specific, accurate and reproducible compared with standard wall motion analysis for recognition of significant CAD in diabetic patients.