Prehospital and Disaster Medicineto a lack of clear guidelines and prior preparedness. Learning from these experiences, a contingency plan was prepared after consultation with all stakeholders. It was implemented during 2009 influenza pandemic. The contingency plan identifies: (1) area responsibilities; (2) disaster and screening areas for the handling of patients; (3) isolation and critical care facilities; (4) deployment of manpower; (5) allocation of drugs, consumables, equipment, and sterile supplies; (6) communication and reporting system; (7) awareness, education, and training; and (8) decisionmaking hierarchy and effective inter-sectoral collaboration. Also, a disaster plan has been prepared that includes standard operating procedures (SOPs) to be followed during infectious PHEs. A hospital infection control manual also has been prepared to address the issue of hospital acquired infections. The contingency plan and SOPs were effective during recent 2009 influenza pandemic in streamlining the response. Conclusion: A well-documented contingency plan prepared in consultation with concerned stakeholders and implemented by a motivated and committed administration is essential in ensuring uninterrupted services during PHEs. It emphasizes that sound PHE plan is never an accident; it is always a result of high intentions, sincere efforts, intelligent direction, and skillful execution. Introduction: In this study, the mean daily and annual radiation exposure of the radiology department staff, other hospital health staff, and public volunteers was compared at Maresal Cakmak Military Hospital in Erzurum, Turkey. Methods: The NEB.211 Dose-Rate Meter with a Gaiger-Müller counter was used to measure the amount of radiation. Six radiology department health staff carried the NEB.211 device during seven working hours. At the end of the day, total absorbed dosages were noted. The same measurements were also done for the six health staff of the other departments and six non-hospital volunteers. Seventeen additional hours were noted for the non-hospital volunteers. The mean value of 17 hours of daily measurements (3.31 mSv) was added to the both group's working hours measurements and the total daily radiation amounts were calculated. Results: There was no statistical difference between each three groups in working hours (p = 0.087), daily and annual equivalent dosages (for both p = 0.099). Discussion: The radiology department health staff was exposed to radiation under the border of equivalent dosage which is determined by Turkish Automic Energy Authority. Public volunteers were seen as they were exposed the radiation over the determined border of equivalent dosage. Nonetheless, with changes depending on living standards, the physical properties of living spaces and geographical circumstances per capita
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.