OFRs are important mediators of tissue damage. However, extracellular OFR generation alone does not induce the typical enzymatic and morphologic changes of acute pancreatitis. Factors other than OFRs must be involved for triggering acute pancreatitis in vivo.

ObjectiveTo evaluate, in an experimental model of acute pancreatitis, the impact of nitric oxide on the disease process and the interaction between nitric oxide and oxygen free radicals. Summary Background DataNitric oxide and oxygen free radicals are involved in the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. It is well established that oxygen free radicals play an important role in the development of pancreatic cell damage and remote organ failure, but the impact of nitric oxide on the disease process and the interactions between the two radical species remain controversial. MethodsNecrotizing pancreatitis (NP) was induced in Wistar rats by intraductal sodium taurocholate infusion after pretreatment with isotonic saline (NP-S), superoxide dismutase/catalase (NP-SOD/CAT), or an anti-ICAM-1 antibody (aICAM-1). Sham-operated rats received isotonic saline (SHX). After an observation period of 5 minutes and 24 hours, the pancreas was removed for microscopy, glutathione, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) analysis. The inducible NO synthase (NOS-2) was detected by Western blotting or RT-PCR. Serum was analyzed for nitrite/nitrate (NO 2 -/NO 3-) and S-nitrosothioles (RSNO), while plasma was used to assay for trypsinogen activation peptides (TAP). ResultsNP-S animals showed a significant decrease in GSH levels after NP-induction as compared with animals under therapy. Increased MPO levels in the NP-S group were significantly reduced by aICAM-1 while SOD/CAT injection showed no changes. Serum NO-derivatives peaked at 12 hours while TAP levels had a maximum at 6 hours after NP induction, and were lower after aICAM-1 application SOD/CAT treatment increased both parameters. Extended acinar cell damage and inflammatory infiltrate developed in NP-S animals and was significantly improved by SOD/CAT and aICAM-1 treatment. RT-PCR and Western-blot analysis revealed NOS-2 expression in the NP-S group, which was reduced by radical scavengers and aICAM-1.

Group II phospholipase A2 (PLA2-II), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are useful indicators of the severity of inflammation in various infections. To compare their discriminatory abilities at an early phase of bacteremia, PLA2-II, PCT and CRP were measured upon admission and 24-48 h thereafter in 29 patients with bacteremia, non-bacteremic bacterial or viral infections. The levels of PLA2-II and PCT were higher in bacteremia than in non-bacteremic bacterial or viral infections. PCT was highest upon admission, PLA2-II peaked at 12-24h, whereas CRP peaked one day later. At < or =24h, the AUC(ROC)s of PLA2-II and PCT were superior to those of CRP. Thereafter, the AUC(ROC)s of PLA2-II and PCT decreased and those of CRP increased. PLA2-II at cut-off level of 150 microg/L and PCT at 2-6 microg/L showed high sensitivity and specificity for bacteremia within the first 24h. In conclusion, PLA2-II and PCT are useful markers for early diagnosis of bacteremia. Devising analytical methods suitable for point-of-care testing would further enhance the clinical utility of the measurement of serum PLA2-II and PCT.

We compared the predictive value of determining group II phospholipase A2 (PLA2) in serum for diagnosing acute appendicitis with the predictive values of white blood cell count (WBC) and measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP). In this prospective study, we included 186 patients who were undergoing appendectomy after clinical diagnoses of acute appendicitis. The performance of each test was measured by receiver-operating characteristic curves. WBC was the test of choice in diagnosing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, in contrast to CRP and PLA2, which increased in patients with protracted inflammation, there was not a concomitant increase in WBC. Therefore, especially CRP, but also PLA2, were better indicators of appendiceal perforation or abscess formation than was WBC. Increased WBC, CRP, and PLA2 values did not unequivocally corroborate the clinical suspicion of appendicitis, but if all three values were within normal limits, acute appendicitis could be excluded with a 100% predictive value. PLA2 values showed a highly significant correlation with CRP but not with WBC values, which supports the view that PLA2 represents an acute-phase reactant.

No abstract