The article analyzes the theoretical and law enforcement aspects of justice as a principle of punishability, the purpose of criminal punishment and the general commencement of sentencing. The primary focus is the issues of appointment and execution of punishment in the form of imprisonment. The problems of exemption from serving a sentence due to illness, penalization of drug crimes and compensatory punishment as the most relevant and illustrative facts of the existing relationship of justice with the principles of legality and humanism are analyzed in particular. Based on the study of the exclusion of persons sentenced to imprisonment, the boundaries of the fairness of individual sanctions of criminal law norms were studied, and the fairness of their application was evaluated in connection with the possibilities of modern justice, including the presence of discrete powers of the court in terms of assigning a specific type of correctional institution. It is noted that the discursive analysis of legal studies and empirical data reflects two main directions for the implementation of justice of punishment in its effective appointment and execution: on the one hand, the correction of the convicted person in a safe penitentiary process should be provided, and on the other, there are deontic expectations of the victim, society and the state from the impact of necessary and sufficient measures for criminal coercion. Observation of the results of the author’s research, data from judicial practice and statistics does not allow us to draw a conclusion about the absolutization of the justice of punishment in the considered aspects. However, a promising focus of the penitentiary process is the increased individualization and differentiation of punishment based on the nature and degree of public danger of the crime, as well as the importance of private-public interests.
Уголовное право и криминология 125 Библиографический список Анощенкова С. В. Восстановительно-компенсационная функция уголовного права // Библиотека уголовного права и криминологии. 2014. № 3. Головко Л. В. Альтернативы уголовному преследованию в современном праве. СПб., 2002. Дудченко М. Ю. Освобождение от уголовной ответственности с назначением судебного штрафа: возможные проблемы на практике // Уголовный процесс. 2016. № 10. Звечаровский И. О юридической природе судебного штрафа (ст. 76 2 , 104 4 УК РФ) // Уголовное право. 2016. № 6. Кудрявцева А., Сутягин К. Судебный штраф // Уголовное право. 2016. № 6. Лобанова Л., Мкртчян С. Некоторые проблемы установления и реализации нового основания освобождения от уголовной ответственности // Уголовное право. 2016. № 6. Пикуров Н. И. Освобождение от уголовной ответственности с назначением судебного штрафа: юридическая природа и перспективы применения // Уголовное право: стратегия развития в XXI веке: матер.
The article examines the peculiarities of the spread and counteraction of the new coronavirus infection in Russian penitentiary institutions. Special attention is paid to the issues of keeping suspects, accused and convicted persons in isolation, as well as related recommendations of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The results of the study of the order and conditions of isolation in Russian penitentiary institutions, together with somatic indicators of the age and health of persons held in them, give grounds for reasonable alarm about the existence of increased risks of the spread of COVID-19. However, practice shows that timely sanitary and epidemiological measures taken by the state and special restrictions of a regime nature in isolation have restrained the spread of the disease. Conclusions are drawn about the need to change some provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the penal enforcement legislation to ensure the possibility of urgent correction of criminal policy and law enforcement in conditions of high readiness for natural and man-made emergencies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.