Purpose: We evaluated radiofrequency (RF) heating of a humerus implant embedded in a gel phantom during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the speciˆc absorption rate (SAR), angle between the implant and static magneticˆeld (B 0 ), and position of the implant in the irradiation coil.Methods: We embedded a stainless steel humerus implant 2 cm deep in tissue-equivalent loop and mass phantoms, placed it parallel to the static magneticˆeld of a 1.5T MR scanner, and recorded the temperatures of the implant surface with RF-transparentˆberoptic sensors. We measured rises in temperature at the tips of the implant by varying the SAR from 0.2 to 4.0 W/kg and evaluated RF heating of the implant for its angle to B 0 and its displacement along B 0 from the center of the RF irradiation coil.Results: RF heating was similar for the loop and mass phantoms because the eddy current ‰ows through the periphery of both. As the SAR increased, the temperature at the implant tip increased, and there was a linear relationship between the SAR and temperature rise. The values were 6.49 C at 2.0 W/kg and 12.79 C at 4.0 W/kg. Rise in temperature decreased steeply as the angle between the implant and B 0 surpassed 459 . In addition, as the implant was displaced from the center of the RF coil to both ends, the rise in temperature decreased.Conclusion: The rise in temperature in deep tissue was estimated to be higher than 1.09 C for SAR above 0.4 W/kg. RF heating was greatest when the implant was set parallel to B 0 . In MR imaging of patients with implants, there is a risk of RF heating when the loop of the eddy current is formed inside the body.

Purpose: To evaluate the eŠect of radiofrequency (RF) heating on a metallic implant during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), temperatures at several positions of an implant were measured, and results are compared with electromagnetic simulations using aˆnite element method.Methods: A humerus nail implant made of stainless steel was embedded at various depths of tissue-equivalent gel-phantoms with loop (loop phantom) and partially cut loop (loop-cut phantom), and the phantoms were placed parallel to the static magneticˆeld of a 1.5T MRI device. Scans were conducted at maximum RF for 15 min, and temperatures were recorded with 2 RF-transparentˆberoptic sensors. Finally, electromagnetic-ˆeld analysis was performed.Results: Temperatures increased at both ends of the implants at various depths, and temperature increase was suppressed with increasing depth. The maximum temperature rise was 12.39 C at the tip of the implant and decreased for the loop-cut phantom. These tendencies resembled the results of electromagnetic simulations.Conclusion: RF heating was veriˆed even in a nonmagnetizing metal implant in a case of excessive RF irradiation. Particularly, rapid temperature rise was observed at both ends of the implant having large curvatures. The diŠerence in temperature increase by depth was found to re‰ect the skin-depth eŠect of RF intensity. Electromagnetic simulation was extremely useful for visualizing the eddy currents within the loop and loop-cut phantoms and for evaluating RF heating of a metallic implant for MRI safety.

We evaluated radiofrequency (RF) heating of various implants embedded in a gel phantom during magnetic resonance (MR) procedures. We examined the dependence of RF heating on variation in speciˆc absorption rate (SAR) and angle between the implant and the static magneticˆeld (B 0 ) and on the displacement of the phantom in the irradiation coil using a 1.5-tesla MR system, and we compared the in‰uence of RF heating on the same implant using a 3.0T MR system.Our results support the occurrence of RF heating of implants made of non-magnetizing metal. We observed greater RF heating when the implant was set parallel to B 0 , embedded at a shallower depth, and placed at the center of the RF irradiation coil. We also conˆrmed that the rise in temperature was proportionate to the increase in SAR. We considered the diŠerence in temperature elevation on depth of embedding to re‰ect the skin-depth eŠect of RF intensity for both the 1.5-and 3.0-T MR systems.

Purpose: We evaluate radiofrequency (RF) heating of two kinds of hip joint implants of different sizes, shapes and materials. Temperature rises at various positions of each implant are measured and compared with a computer simulation based on electromagnetic-field analysis. Methods: Two kinds of implants made of cobalt-chromium alloy and titanium alloy were embedded at a 2-cm depth of tissue-equivalent gel-phantom. The phantom was placed parallel to the static magnetic field of a 1.5 T MRI device. Scans were conducted at the specific absorption rate of 2.5 W/kg for 15 min, and temperatures were recorded with RF-transparent fiberoptic sensors. Temperatures of the implant surface were measured at 6 positions, from the tip to the head. Measured temperature rises were compared with the results of electromagnetic-field analysis. Results: The maximum temperature rise was observed at the tip of each implant, and it was 9.0˚C for the cobaltchromium implant and 5.3˚C for the titanium implant. The simulated heating positions with electromagneticfield analysis accorded with experimental results. However, a difference in temperature rise was seen with the titanium implant. Conclusion: RF heating was confirmed to take place at both ends of the implants in spite of their different shapes. The maximum temperature rise was observed at the tip where there is large curvature. The value was found to depend on physical properties of the implant materials. The discrepancy between experimental and simulated temperature rises was presumed to be the result of an incomplete model for the titanium implant.

No abstract