A panel of 10 monoclonal antibodies raised to 3 different poliovirus type 1 strains was tested in a micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and in a micro-neutralization test against 87 poliovirus type 1 strains. The results, evaluated in a newly developed system for intratypic strain characterization, were compared with the results obtained with the classical serodifferentiation system by using a small number of strain-specific, cross-absorbed antisera. The new system not only uses results obtained with strain-specific antibody preparations, but also uses the information obtained with monoclonal antibodies reacting with less unique antigenic determinants. In a theoretical pattern fitting computer program, each virus strain could be compared with all the other strains for which serological data were stored in the memory of the computer. The results obtained with the new system coincided well with those obtained with the classical system: all except one of the strains classified as Sabin-like or intermediate in the classical system scored ‘perfect fit’ or ‘related’ with the Sabin 1 vaccine strain in the new system. Likewise, all virus isolates classified as Kuwait-like in the classical system scored ‘perfect fit’ or ‘related’ with the Dutch Kuwait-like isolate strain 78–9030.
Murine lymphocyte hybridomas which produce neutralizing or non-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to different type 1, 2 or 3 poliovirus strains were isolated. The majority of these monoclonal antibodies reacted with antigenic determinants present on different polio-virus strains of the same type. However, hybridomas producing monoclonal antibodies specific for each of the three Sabin vaccine strains were also generated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.