EUCAST expert rules have been developed to assist clinical microbiologists and describe actions to be taken in response to specific antimicrobial susceptibility test results. They include recommendations on reporting, such as inferring susceptibility to other agents from results with one, suppression of results that may be inappropriate, and editing of results from susceptible to intermediate or resistant or from intermediate to resistant on the basis of an inferred resistance mechanism. They are based on current clinical and/or microbiological evidence. EUCAST expert rules also include intrinsic resistance phenotypes and exceptional resistance phenotypes, which have not yet been reported or are very rare. The applicability of EUCAST expert rules depends on the MIC breakpoints used to define the rules. Setting appropriate clinical breakpoints, based on treating patients and not on the detection of resistance mechanisms, may lead to modification of some expert rules in the future.

The associations of Streptococcus intermedius, S. constellatus, and S. anginosus (the three species of the S. mileri group) with clinical infections and sites of isolation were investigated by using a simple biochemical scheme to identify a collection of 153 clinical isolates. S. intermedius was associated with abscesses of the brain and liver, while both S. anginosus and S. constellatus were isolated from a wider range of sites and infections. S. anginosus strains predominated in both genitourinary and gastrointestinal sources and exhibited a wider range of phenotypes, particularly in the ability to ferment mannitol and/or raffinose.

If isolates are speciated and if a sufficient range of antibiotics is tested, underlying resistance mechanisms can often be inferred from the antibiogram data. This allows: (i) anomalous combinations of phenotype and organism to be reconsidered; (ii) prediction of further antibiotics that deserve testing; and (iii) the suppression of susceptibilities that are anomalous in the light of the inferred mechanism. This 'interpretative reading' is widely undertaken in France but is largely precluded in the UK by limited speciation and the testing of narrow ranges of antibiotics. Nevertheless, UK laboratories should be aware of: (i) grossly anomalous combinations of species and phenotype, demanding reference laboratory confirmation; (ii) useful indicator drugs, where resistance implies a mechanism conferring other resistances that may be less obvious in direct tests; and (iii) antibiotics that are prone to select resistant mutants of particular species during therapy. Details of these combinations of organism and resistance are presented. Relationships between antibiogram and mechanism are also presented to allow full interpretative reading for those testing wide panels of drugs versus speciated isolates.

SUMMARY This review aims to discuss expert systems in general and how they may be used in medicine as a whole and clinical microbiology in particular (with the aid of interpretive reading). It considers rule-based systems, pattern-based systems, and data mining and introduces neural nets. A variety of noncommercial systems is described, and the central role played by the EUCAST is stressed. The need for expert rules in the environment of reset EUCAST breakpoints is also questioned. Commercial automated systems with on-board expert systems are considered, with emphasis being placed on the “big three”: Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, and MicroScan. By necessity and in places, the review becomes a general review of automated system performances for the detection of specific resistance mechanisms rather than focusing solely on expert systems. Published performance evaluations of each system are drawn together and commented on critically.