No abstract

The objectives of the 2 studies reported herein were to validate the accuracy of an automated monitoring device (AMD) to detect side lying, resting, activity, rumination, eating, walking, and panting in nonlactating and lactating dairy cows. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether the total time per cow-state recorded by the AMD within a 30-min interval corresponds to the total time per cow-state recorded simultaneously by visual observation. Study personnel (n = 2) observed pregnant nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 10) for 30 min in the morning and 30 min in the afternoon for 6 consecutive days and recorded continuously each cowstate. In study 2, study personnel (n = 2) observed lactating Holstein cows (n = 10) for 30 min in the morning and 30 min in the afternoon for 6 consecutive days. In both studies, cow-state was recorded every second, and within 1 min, the most prevalent cow-state was considered to be the behavior presented by the cow during that interval. Using the observer as the gold standard, test characteristics were calculated for the minute-by-minute interval analyses. For the 30-min interval analyses, the concordance correlation coefficient (p c ) and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) between the total minutes for each cow-state recorded by the observer and the AMD were calculated. In study 1, for the minute-by-minute interval analyses, test characteristics were high for rumination (≥90.1%) and eating (≥73.8%), moderate for resting (≥62.9%), but negligible for medium activity (≥17%). For the 30-min interval analyses, the correlations between the total time of visual observations compared with the total time recorded by AMD for rumination (R 2 = 0.97, p c = 0.98) and eating (R 2 = 0.91, p c = 0.94) were very high, for resting (R 2 = 0.77, p c = 0.79) was high, and for medium activity (R 2 = 0.41, p c = 0.41) was low. In study 2, for the minute-by-minute interval analyses, test characteristics were high for rumination (≥79.4%), eating (≥74.2%), and resting (≥73.0%), but they were low for panting (≥31.3%) and negligible for medium activity (≥22.2%). For the 30-min interval analyses, the correlations were similar to study 1 (rumination: R 2 = 0.85, p c = 0.91; eating: R 2 = 0.95, p c = 0.97; resting: R 2 = 0.84, p c = 0.90; medium activity: R 2 = 0.44, p c = 0.57; and panting: R 2 = 0.21, p c = 0.42). In summary, the AMD used in this study provided accurate data regarding resting, rumination, and eating of pregnant nonlactating and lactating Holstein cows.

Objectives were to evaluate the effect of 2 analogs of PGF 2α (cloprostenol vs. dinoprost) and 2 doses (1 injection vs. 2 injections) on luteolysis, follicle diameter, hormonal concentrations, and time to ovulation in dairy heifers. Holstein heifers were fitted with automated estrus detection devices and had their estrous cycle synchronized using PGF 2α and an intravaginal insert containing progesterone. Heifers detected in estrus were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: cloprostenol on d 7 after estrus (CLOx1; n = 45), cloprostenol on d 7 and 8 after estrus (CLOx2; n = 41), dinoprost on d 7 after estrus (DINx1; n = 43), or dinoprost on d 7 and 8 after estrus (DINx2; n = 44). Treatment with the first injection of PGF 2α was defined as experiment d 0. Area and blood flow of corpus luteum (CL) and diameter of follicles >5 mm were recorded every 12 h from d 0 to estrus and every 6 h thereafter until ovulation. Blood was sampled every 6 h from d 0 until ovulation. Heifers treated with cloprostenol had shorter interval to luteolysis (± SEM; CLOx1 = 23.5 ± 2.2, CLOx2 = 22.9 ± 2.2, DINx1 = 32.6 ± 2.7, DINx2 = 26.4 ± 2.1 h); however, time to ovulation was not affected by treatment. A smaller proportion of heifers treated with a single injection of PGF 2α underwent luteolysis compared with heifers treated with 2 injections (CLOx1 = 84.6 ± 6.2, CLOx2 = 100.0 ± 0.0, DINx1 = 59.7 ± 9.8, DINx2 = 96.3 ± 2.7%). Proportion of heifers that ovulated was smaller for DINx1 compared with other treatments (CLOx1 = 88.8 ± 5.1, CLOx2 = 100.0 ± 0.0, DINx1 = 55.2 ± 9.7, DINx2 = 94.4 ± 3.4%). Ovulatory follicle diameter was larger for DINx1 (18.2 ± 2.7 mm) compared with DINx2 (17.4 ± 2.7 mm), whereas dose did not affect the diameter of the ovulatory follicle in heifers treated with cloprostenol (CLOx1 = 17.6 ± 2.7 vs. CLOx2 = 17.8 ± 2.8 mm). Among heifers that underwent luteolysis, progesterone concentrations from 18 to 36 h after treatment were lesser in heifers treated with cloprostenol compared with those treated with dinoprost. Type of PGF 2α did not affect progesterone concentrations past 36 h from treatment; however, heifers treated with 2 PGF 2α injections had lesser progesterone concentrations and CL blood flow from 36 to 72 h after treatment compared with heifers that received a single PGF 2α injection.

No abstract