Assessing the progress of lectures ensures the involvement of lectures in the exercise of science dissemination by research, education, and community service. That job affects the performance of lecturers at universities throughout the country. The performance of lecturers is evaluated regularly because of the vast number of evaluation attributes. Manual assessment can take time and cannot be carried out. In the evaluation of lecturer’s outcomes, a decision support model is needed to facilitate decision making. This study applies the preference ranking organization method for enrichment assessment (PROMETHEE) as a decision model in Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and Geometric Analysis for Interactive Aid (GAIA) as a geometric analysis in determining lecturer performance. This analysis resulted in the maximal value of an alternative of 2 with Phi 0.2333, followed by 1 and 3 alternatives. These results suggest that alternative 2 is the best way to assess the performance of lecturers as the main indicator. Alternative 3 is the least recommendable alternative because of its lowest precision on the basis of visualization results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.