Background: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is the most common seasonal allergic rhinitis in Japan. Standardized JC pollen extract is available for subcutaneous immunotherapy, but this treatment is limited by potentially serious side effects. The aim of this double-blind, randomized comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized JC pollen extract in a new oral formulation (CEDARTOLEN®, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for JC pollinosis. Methods: A total of 531 subjects with JC pollinosis were randomized into 2 groups at a ratio of 1:1 to receive daily sublingual administration of standardized JC pollen extract with a maintenance dose of 2,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) or placebo for 2 consecutive pollen seasons. The efficacy was evaluated using the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the total ocular symptom and medication score (TOSMS) and scores for individual symptoms and medication. Results: The TNSMS was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in the SLIT group than in the placebo group in the peak symptom period by 18 and 30% in the first and second seasons, respectively. All secondary end points were also significantly lower in the SLIT group in both seasons. No systemic anaphylaxis occurred. Conclusions: SLIT with daily administration of standardized JC pollen extract was effective for improving nasal and ocular symptoms of JC pollinosis and reducing the use of relief medication. The JC pollen extract was well tolerated with only local adverse events.
Recent observations have suggested significant worldwide increase in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis and cedar pollinosis. In Japan, Japanese cedar (Cryptometria japonica) and Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) pollens are considered to be the major unique allergens and their extent of dispersal is quite large, travelling more than 100km and thus causing serious pollinosis. Cedar pollinosis is a typical type 1 allergic disease by an adaptive immune response that occurs through the induction of allergen-specific effector T cells from naïve T cells. We examined the number of Japanese cedar pollen specific memory Th cells in the peripheral blood of the patients and found that the cedar pollen specific IL-4-producing Th2 memory cells increased during the pollen season and decreased during the off-season. However, more than 60% of the cedar-specific memory Th2 cells survived up to 8 months after the pollen season. Natural killer T(NKT) cells represent a unique lymphocyte subpopulation and their activity is not restricted to MHC antigens. NKT cells play an important role in innate immunity, however, the participation in development of allergic rhinitis could not be clarified.
Allergen-reactive ST2 CD45RO CD4 cells or those combined with IL-5 IL-13 CD27 CD161 CD4 cells may be useful as markers indicating the successful treatment of SLIT. These cells may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AR as pathogenic memory Th2 cells.
Interleukin-25 and a subpopulation of tissue T-helper type 2 and 9 cells that express increased IL-17RB levels could contribute to infiltration of eosinophils in NPs and could have produced the pathologic difference between NECRS and ECRS.
Background: Japanese cedar pollen represents an important and unique allergen. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been suggested to be a highly effective route of desensitization against a variety of allergens. However, little information is available about its use in cedar pollen allergy. Methods: A blinded randomized, placebo-controlled trial employing SLIT for cedar pollinosis was conducted over a period of 6 months. Sixty-seven subjects were enrolled and the symptom scores during the pollen season were evaluated by a symptom diary, measurement of cedar-specific IgE and IgG4, and determination of Cry j-specific Th2 clones before SLIT and before and after the pollen season. Results: No major adverse effects were observed in either group. The serum-specific IgG4 activity increased significantly after SLIT in the active group. The active group also exhibited significantly lower symptom scores compared to the placebo. The specific Th2 clone sizes were not significantly different between the groups before the pollen season. However, an increase in the clone size was observed after the pollen season in the placebo group, but not in the active group. Conclusion: Use of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis was found to be safe and associated with an increase in cedar-specific IgG4 levels. Such therapy inhibited the increase in Cry j-specific Th2 clone size induced by pollen exposure. Finally, use of SLIT resulted in significant improvement of the clinical symptoms of cedar pollinosis in this patient population. These observations suggest that SLIT may offer another safe approach to the management of cedar pollinosis.
Japanese cedar pollinosis is an important contributor to allergic rhinitis in Japan. Lactobacillus may be useful as an immunomodulator and is used widely as a foodstuff. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of daily intake of the Lactobacillus paracasei strain KW3110 in patients with cedar pollinosis. The effects of daily intake of KW3110 in patients with cedar pollinosis were investigated in 126 patients who received KW3110 or a placebo in a double-blind study. The study began 1 month before the start of the pollen season and lasted for 3 months. A significant reduction of nasal symptoms and the serum level of eosinophil cationic protein and improvement of quality of life scores occurred in the patients who received KW3110 when pollen scattering was low. However, the effects were limited during the peak period of pollen scattering. Intake of KW3110 may reduce allergic inflammation, but the effect is limited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.