The pH and calcium ion release of three root canal sealers--Sealapex, Sealer 26, and Apexit--were assessed at 24 and 48 hr, and at 7 and 30 days after spatulation. After manipulation, the sealers were placed in 1-cm-long tubes measuring 4 mm in diameter and immersed in a glass flask containing 10 ml of deionized water, which was hermetically sealed and stored at 37 degrees C. The tubes were removed at the scheduled times and the water in which they were immersed was tested for pH with a pHmeter and for released calcium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Starting 48 hr after immersion, Selapex produced an alklaine pH and released significantly higher calcium amounts compared with the other two sealers, with even more pronounced results after 30 days. On the basis of the results obtained, we conclude that Sealapex presented the highest calcium and hydroxyl release, especially after longer time intervals, whereas Sealer 26 showed highest release during the initial periods (i.e. during its setting time). Apexit presented the least satisfactory results.
Guidelines for post placement are lacking in respect of the amount of tooth structure, particularly in cases in which ≥50% of coronal structure is preserved. The aim of this review was to provide evidence-based principles for the use of posts in the restoration of root filled teeth with limited tissue loss. A literature search of laboratory and clinical studies published between 2000 and 2014 was conducted in PubMed. Included studies contained at least one study group with root filled teeth restored without a post, presented at least one group with root filled teeth with limited tissue loss, and, in the case of laboratory studies, performed mechanical cycling prior to a fracture resistance test. Based on the evidence from laboratory studies, root filled premolars and molars with limited tissue loss can be restored without posts, particularly when total coverage is planned. However, when no cusp protection is provided, post placement appears to be beneficial in premolars. Evidence regarding the best restoration option for root filled incisors with limited tissue loss remains controversial. When total coverage is intended, reconstruction seems to be successfully performed by restoration with composite. However, some reports consider that post insertion increases fracture loads. The review of clinical studies demonstrated that survival of teeth with substantial tooth tissue is not influenced by the use of posts. Exceptions were found when only premolars were investigated; in these cases, post placement was associated with greater survival rates in crowned teeth and fewer root fractures in teeth without cusp protection.
No statistical difference was noticed regarding the root resection methods; however, in comparing materials, Sealer 26 was statistically superior to OZE. In the subgroup comparison, a significant difference was noticed in the Laser and Sealer 26 and the Laser and OZE and bur and OZE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.